>From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [TruthTalk] MORMON REDEFINITION ALERT
>Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:00:29 -0800
>
(in the first-person present tense, in this case), should be "
Perry wrote:
>> by whom is such a covenant relationship
>> "authorized".
Blaine wrote:
> Answer: Persons authorized by having had the
> appropriate Holy PH conferred upon them, and
> being deemed worthy from a personal standpoint
> to baptize for the remission of sins, and/or
> to confer the G
One UN authorized lays hands on another UN authorized. Like Joe & Oliver authorizing each other. It's in that story that they have "NO Historical basis" for, according to their own.Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Blaine, by whom is such a covenant relationship "authorized".Perry
>
Perry, I will give you three guesses, and the first two don't count. LOL
(Answer:Persons authorized by having had the appropriate Holy PH
conferred upon them, and being deemed worthy from a personal standpoint
to baptize for the remission of sins, and/or to confer the Gift of the
Holy Ghost.
Blaine, by whom is such a covenant relationship "authorized".Perry
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Hi Judy, In Mormon Jaberwocky, "Gentile" has several meanings, depending
>on the context. Sometimes it means Christians who have not entered into
>an authorized covenant relationship with Jesus Chris
Hi Judy, In Mormon Jaberwocky, "Gentile" has several meanings, depending
on the context. Sometimes it means Christians who have not entered into
an authorized covenant relationship with Jesus Christ, sometimes it
actually refers to Gentile (Japheth) nations, which are mostly of the
Judeo-Christi
g from Utah, or from known Mormons on the list, and adds the footnotes automatically. Isn't technology wonderful?Happy New Year to all with a big grin,Perry
>From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [TruthTa
When it does not make sense, as in "that is bad" you know they can not mean bad, it does not fit.
When someone disguises the double meaning this can go on for some time without discovery, the words fit. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This brings us bac
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This brings us back to the Humpty Dumpty model of word
usage: "When I use a word, it means exactly what I choose
it to mean!" Perry
Judy:
Don't words get new meanings when enough ppl understand
them as such - like young ppl who use the
>From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] MORMON REDEFINITION ALERT
>Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:17:55 -0800 (PST)
>
>EXACTLY!
>Thanks for pointing this out.
>Gentile is definitely any NO
EXACTLY!
Thanks for pointing this out.
Gentile is definitely any NON Mormon!
This Double speak has been occuring on TT
Hopefully everyone is aware of this.
The more you deal with mormons the more you will find this to be true.
That is whay some people call them LDS-Liars Decievers Seducers.Charles
WARNING! MORMON REDEFINITION ALERT!!!. Blaine is using a word that means something different to Mormon that to the rest of the english speaking world:
To a Mormon "Gentile" does NOT mean "non-Jewish"...it means "non-Mormon." They have redefined the word, but notice Blaine did not bother to mention
12 matches
Mail list logo
