Man, I think I have misspoken !!
Judy attributes the following to me.Understand, I have not seen the post from Lance , in which these words apparently originated - so , of course , without any context at all, I decide that the following is appropriate ! I do hope Lance understands.
I have to
@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2006 19:38
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Huh ?? and
Huh?? again
See, The Prophet thinks you are giving me your understanding of my
theology -- only repeating back to me what you think I have
said. Nonsense. And here
Judy asks:
Tell me why he (Jesus) HAD to be like US in every way? Why couldn't he have been like the first Adam before the fall, ...
Bill responds
the first Adam before the fall did not need to be saved Judy. We do.
Bill
And judy , well, does what?
The first Adam after the fall did indeed
JD Neither you or Bill are making any points that
matter.
You are so obsessed withdoctrine that can not be
validated by God's Word.
If I remember correctly your thingis "what is
unassumed is unsaved" so every vile thing had to be assumed
Actually -it was "at Calvary" ... But it was
notin
See, The Prophet thinks you are giving me your understanding of my theology -- only repeating back to me what you think I have said. Nonsense. And here is a perfect example. "What is unassumed is unsaved" has absolutely no heritage in my writings. I don't even know what that means. Just absolute
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:38:08 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See, The Prophet thinks you are giving me your understanding of my
theology -- only repeating back to me what you think I have
said. Nonsense. And here is a perfect example. "What
is unassumed is unsaved" has absolutely
6 matches
Mail list logo
