In a message dated 11/25/2004 10:02:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This brings up what I think is an important consideration to contemplate. I personally believe that Jesus calls us to walk in love by assuming the best of another person whenever it is plausible to do so.
In a message dated 11/25/2004 10:02:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This brings up what I think is an important consideration to contemplate. I personally believe that Jesus calls us to walk in love by assuming the best of another person whenever it is plausible to do so.
ï
Jeff in red,
I belive John
wrote:
I learned today, that Madonna is studying
Kabbalah.
I doubt if madonna and her ilk have
a clue about real Kabbala.
In fact, I know that I'm
not,hmm, need a word,mature enough to get involved in Kabbala study. I
need to grow spiritually before gett
In a message dated 11/26/2004 5:32:59 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kabbala #1 - What Is Kabbala?
by Rabbi Shimon Leiberman
Thanks Jeff. This helps.
John
If
that is my belief (which it is), would it not also
be walking in love if I admonished a brother to “be careful” about how he
judges someone, to avoid harming himself? (Especially someone as beloved of God
as Abraham?) AND would you, if you were walking in love, assume that I
was cautio
This brings up what I
think is an important consideration to contemplate. I personally believe
that Jesus calls us to walk in love by assuming the best of another person
whenever it is plausible to do so.
One additional point -- one is not a loving person who has no regard for
what he/
Very interesting, Jeff. Where do we get
the rest of the series? Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004
7:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Assuming
the best / walking in love
In a message dated 11/26/2004 9:09:51 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to deal with spiritual principles; not personalities. What if thinking evil of another brings evil upon you? Is that possible? Izzy
Well, there certainly are consequences to be dealt with as a
] Assuming the
best / walking in love?
Very interesting,
Jeff. Where do we get the rest of the series?
Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff PowersSent: Friday, November 26, 2004 7:32
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
Hi Izzy,
I want to clarify your point here.
Izzy states, I am trying to deal
with spiritual principles; not personalities. What if thinking evil of another
brings evil upon you? Is that possible? Izzy
Jonathan asks the following as clarification: If
thinking evil of another brings evil
Of course, there are times when the spoken Choice has been
preached to those who have already made their choice --
"pearls before swine" as they say.
John
Exactly. And I assume that is not the fault of the
messenger? Izzy
I still don’t see the link.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004
12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Assuming
the best / walking in love?
OOPS,I thought I included the link
: PROBABLE
SPAM> RE: [TruthTalk] Assuming the best / walking in
love?
I still don’t see the
link.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeff
PowersSent: Friday, November
26, 2004 12:35 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthT
Jonathan asks the following as
clarification: If thinking evil of another brings evil upon oneself would
it be appropriate to say that to think good of another brings good upon
oneself? It appears to me that this is following a line of thought that
involves karma. One builds up karma
If I am not mistaken, some of us are talking about evil and sin. Are
they not one and the same?
Terry
If I am not mistaken, some of us are talking about evil and sin. Are they not
one and the same?
Terry
Good point Terry. If we think someone is
evil we should be able to point to what specific sin, scripturally, they are
committing. Izzy
perhaps sin has
certain concrete qualities (sins), e.g., i seen a sleight of hand
in the cookie jar while evil has certain abstract qualities,
e.g., what transpired in the rise and fall of the 3rd
reich(?);
but what's the
fundamental diff betw the rise and fall of the 3rd reich as a stor
DAVEH: ??? Does failure to repent make one evil?
ShieldsFamily wrote:
If I am not mistaken, some of us are talking about evil and sin. Are
they not
one and the same?
Terry
Good point
Terry. If we think someone is
evil we should be able to point to what specific sin, s
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: ??? Does failure to repent make one evil?
One repents because one is already evil.
Failure to repent makes you doomed.
Terry
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 9:01
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Assuming
the best / walking in love?
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: ??? Does failure to repent
make one
myth (then what's
to repent of? to whom?)
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 22:46:49 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
A repentant person is
none of the descriptions below:
e·vil
adj. Morally bad or
wrong; wicked.
Causing ruin, injury, or pain;
harmful.
In a message dated 11/26/2004 3:29:00 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These are reasons that I am hesitant to speak evil of questionable âevangelistsâ, etc., unless I am REALLY sure about them. Iâm sure I havenât thought this out completely, and would appreciate feedback from
In a message dated 11/26/2004 6:10:21 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what's the fundamental diff betw the rise and fall of the 3rd reich as a story told by whose biographer/s(?) and a shrug that translates to 'i was starvd and i really thought you wouldn't mind if i tried to
In a message dated 11/26/2004 5:33:32 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, there are times when the spoken Choice has been preached to those who have already made their choice -- "pearls before swine" as they say.
John
Exactly. And I assume that is not the fa
i suspect you
mean in terms of how lies become 'true'
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 10:27:32 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||Redundency is often the mother of
truth.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004
9:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Assuming
the best / walking in love?
In a message dated 11/26/2004 5:33:32 PM Pacific Standard
Time
Izzy in blue:
To be critical of another's speech speech is not to assume the worst os
another. But where has God called
us to be critical of another’s form of speech? Is there a Commandment to
speak/communicate in a certain way? Is it a sin not to communicate
according to the desires of
27 matches
Mail list logo