Kevin, having a conversation in which you
try to discuss what it means to be a follower of Christ is hardly being
unequally yoked with unbelievers. Some people here claim to be Christians. It
is my intention to find out if we have any common ground upon which to base
that claim. Obviously
Kevin, having a conversation in which you try to discuss what it means to be a follower of Christ is hardly being unequally yoked with unbelievers. And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. Here on TT: Any unfruitful works of darkness? Ant
This has nothing to do with what goes on here. You are , in fact, in full agreement with no one. Dittoeach on this forum. So howIS that unequally yoked thingy working for you, huh Kevin? Must be lonely when you are the onlyone left standing.
jd-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan
You are , in fact, in full agreement with no one.What a STUPID statement. Why is it that you always have to go to the extremes? Lonely? Not anymore lonely than it was for C H Spurgeon. Not anymore lonely than it was for any number of God's men down thru history. I have news for you,
Meaning that everyone has their own Jesus and there is
no standard of Truth?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:16:42 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The definitive answer to your query concerning
'your own Jesus' is...well...YES.
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep
There most assuredly is. David Miller, Bill Taylor
and John Smithson however, have demonstrated on numerous occasions, that it is
NOT ALWAYS YOURS! To ward off yet another charge of blasphemy by David, I'll
simply say that ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SCRIPTURE ARE NEITHER EXHAUSTIVE NOR
And I will simply say once more that the Word of God
needs no "INTERPRETATION" and that this is the crux of
the problem. Scripture can only be spiritually
discerned. (1 Cor 2:14)so all of your theological "interpreters"
will in the last day prove to have been false
prophets/teachers.
On
You glibbly misuse this scripturewhile, at the same time, consistently ignoring the problem that "infallible understanding" brings into the discussion. You Judy, believe that both the bible and your reading of the textare inspired - they cannot be wrong. The problem with this assertionis
I can agree with you that much, Lance, as
there are ever-deeper meanings in scripture than we have yet scratched the
surface of. (Hows that for a dangling participle?) I think we will
spend eternity discovering those deeper meanings and will forever praise God
for the miracles of His Word!
True Iz
But one must begin somewhere, so how about we agree at
a surface level; we are not even there yet
and won't be so long as we have so many other
'mediators'.
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:17:02 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I can agree with you
that much, Lance, as
JESUS IS LORD!
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 05, 2005 10:28
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is
Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific
imagination?
Perhaps we
Phase 1 create problem Phase 2 create solutionPhase 1 look at all the different understandings of scripture! Phase 2 Mormon "we have a Prophet" Phase 2 RCC "we have a Prophet/POPE" Phase 2 Scholar "we have a Degree and understand the context and culture.We speak read theOriginal
What if we can find some areas of Agreement with the Devil? Why do LDS always look for areas of agreement? You must Buy the problem before you Bite the apple!And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Perhaps we should
Are you an Ecumenist? "It is better to have divisions than an evil uniformity." Walter Cradock If we all get together we WILL most assuredly conform to the lowest common denominator Evil!Amos 3:3 Can two walk together, except they be agreed?ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is a very good beginning!!! What is
He Lord of in your life? Is there any area where He is not Lord in our lives?
iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005
9:46 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject:
Amen, lets ALL get together!!! Lu 4:41 And devils also came out of many, crying out, and saying, Thou art Christ the Son of God. James 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of
How about the dreaded tongue?
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 05, 2005 12:00
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is
Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific
imagination?
Kevin, is there no way we can find common
ground upon which to grow in the Lord together, or exhort each other in holiness?
Is that agreeing with the devil in your estimation? If we are only here to
disparage and devour each other, then whats the point? iz
From:
[EMAIL
Thats my point. Do you want to
bicker over disagreements 100% of the time, or walk together in the areas that
we DO agree at least part of the time? Perhaps there is nothing we agree on; is that what you are
saying? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
then whats the point? purityFirst off one must be IN the Lord before they can grow thereby. Iam not interested in Union with those that can not discern the holy from the profane. ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Kevin, is there no way
we can find common ground
Many of the major denoms asked this same question in the early 1900's Many stayed inside to keep the denom in the faith but instead went down with the ship. I was in a Presbyterian Church ( in the 60's) when the New Pastor fresh out of seminary brought his Leaven with him. He was a LOST man. I
Actually, Linda,, you have said something that is produndly the case. If we can acknowledge that there may beone truth per passage buta multitude of purposes (in God's mind) for considering that scripture. But, of course, those of youwho believe ininspired personal interpretation (IPT) cannot
Did this come thru this morning? Second post. -Original Message-From: KnpraiseTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:15:36 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific imagination?
You glibbly misuse
Your evangelization method seems to be Divide
and Conquer. Hows it working for you? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005
1:05 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] JUDY
ASKS: Is
I can certainly say that there are times
when I understood a scripture, and later understood it even better for one
reason or another. I believe God has only one purpose for scripture, but as we
grow we learn more deeply what the verses mean. A baby Believer can
believe the Word, but a
You glibbly misuse this scripturewhile, at the same time, consistently ignoring the problem that "infallible understanding" brings into the discussion. You Judy, believe that both the bible and your reading of the textare inspired - they cannot be wrong. The problem with this assertionis
You glibbly misuse this scripturewhile, at the same time, consistently ignoring the problem that "infallible understanding" brings into the discussion. You Judy, believe that both the bible and your reading of the textare inspired - they cannot be wrong. The problem with this assertionis
Keeps the leaven out. There is a Biblical Doctrine of separation. Not very popular today, with all the error compromise INSIDE the Church.ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Your evangelization method seems to be Divide and Conquer. Hows it working
for you? iz
Call it what you want butI see it as Gods Commands to a christian to keep themselves pure. It is taught in the OT the New.2 Co 6 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?And
29 matches
Mail list logo
