ot; comment. Well said!
-- slade
-Original Message-
From: Gregory A. Hession J.D.
Sent: Monday, 17 January, 2005 16.47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now
Ah, but Jeff, there is not only no temple, but the veil was torn in the
temple. Did not G-d himself remove this aspect of the s
That weapon is prayer.
--Rebbe Nachman of Breslov
- Original Message -
From: "Gregory A. Hession J.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 16:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now
Ah, but Jeff, there is not only no temple, but the veil wa
myth (yep)
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:16:34 -0500
"David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> Gary wrote:> > but
not Izzy, eh?> > Izzy stopped. She is a good girl.
:-) Thank you, Izzy.> > Now Gary, you need to decide
something. Are you going to be a good > boy or a bad
boy?
Gary wrote:
> but not Izzy, eh?
Izzy stopped. She is a good girl. :-) Thank you, Izzy.
Now Gary, you need to decide something. Are you going to be a good boy or a
bad boy?
David Miller
TruthTalk Moderator
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
Jeff wrote:
> David, for an intelligent man You can be
> very thick headed often. The ONLY
> reason sacrifices are no longer done is
> the fact that there is no temple!
> You have been told that and you still refuse
> to accept the facts. The only thing I can
> conclude is that you are trying to be
but not Izzy,
eh?
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:54:56 -0500
"David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> Lance, Terry, Jeff, and
Gary... PLEASE!
||
the implication/s for Torah
Observance?
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:47:28 -0500 "Gregory A.
Hession J.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:||
> A new command, a new covenant,
out of the mouth of the master.
||
you want to talk
about this, keep it off the list.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now *REPRIMAND*
is the Judge is readin' this stuff?
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005
rselves with the most potent of weapons.
That weapon is prayer.
--Rebbe Nachman of Breslov
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 12:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now
Jeff wrote:
The simple fact of
hat weapon is prayer.
--Rebbe Nachman of Breslov
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 12:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now
Jeff wrote:
The simple fact of the issue is apart from
a handful of "Da
is the Judge
is readin' this stuff?
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:08:07 -0500 Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what does this
mean?
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:13:42 -0600
"ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> Squealing like a
What it means is that Izzy can say anything she wants with impunity.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 8:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators
Now *REPRIMAND*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Jeff wrote:
> The simple fact of the issue is apart from
> a handful of "Dangerous Messianics" nobody
> here keeps God's Torah
I don't know any "Dangerous Messianics" on this list, but I will say that
those on the list who identify themselves as "Messianics" are not the only
ones who keep God's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what does this mean?
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005
22:13:42 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Squealing like a stuck pig is not the same as BEING a pig.
(Although
> it's possible, but DM didn't call him one.) Izzy
||
[Slade:]
I bet Jeff and
IFF I've read you aright then, I agree. Screw the
private reprimand policy. This is a public forum.
Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2005 23:58
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators
Now *REPR
, January 16, 2005
23:09
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators
Now
In a message dated 1/16/2005 7:19:44 PM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jeff wrote:>Considering that most here reject God's
LawTry to speak only for yourself. My perspective is that mos
I have a friend who was, for some years, involved with the 'Children of God'
headed up by Moses Berg...
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: January 16, 2005 23:47
Subject: Re: [Tru
David Miller wrote:
TruthTalk has not become a dictatorship, and no mass
crucifixions are being planned.
DAVEH: How do you know what is on the planning boards for the next TT
Conference? ;-)
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www
Gary wrote:
> a public reprimand becomes a matter of
> public record the use of which is for the
> public to decide
As I explained in an earlier post, in regards to TruthTalk, I am asking all
members not to discuss the reprimands of the moderators on the list. If you
have some concern, discuss
myth (a public reprimand becomes
a matter of public record the use of which is for the public to
decide)
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:47:47 -0500
"David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:>There should be no discussion
about it except in private
Please do not reply to posts that have *REPRIMAND* in the subject line.
Slade issued a reprimand to me, and two other people have posted replies to
it, creating another thread. Slade is a moderator and his judgment will be
respected. If he says that I attacked Jeff personally with that comment
In a message dated 1/16/2005 8:15:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Squealing like a stuck pig is not the same as BEING a pig. (Although it's
possible, but DM didn't call him one.) Izzy
This is exactly what I predicted. Now who's the prophet of God? It is obvious that
G’nite Gracie
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005
10:35 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Moderators Now *REPRIMAND*
what are you saying
t? It’s a common _expression_ used to describe someone who is
overreacting. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 10:21
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 10:21
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Moderators Now *REPRIMAND*
what does this mean?
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:13:42 -0600
"ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wri
what does this
mean?
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:13:42 -0600
"ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> Squealing like a stuck pig is not the same
as BEING a pig. (Although > it's possible, but DM didn't call him
one.) Izzy||
[Slade:]
I bet Jeff and the pig are equally
upset.:)||
nglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now *REPRIMAND*
Slade Henson wrote:
>No doubt about it. I bet Jeff and the pig are equally upset.:)
>
Terry
>H sounds like a personal attack to me.
>
>--slade
>
>-Original Message-
>From: David Miller
>
In a message dated 1/16/2005 7:19:44 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeff wrote:
>Considering that most here reject God's Law
Try to speak only for yourself. My perspective is that most people on
TruthTalk accept God's law.
If it alright for you to brand one's speech or t
Slade Henson wrote:
No doubt about it. I bet Jeff and the pig are equally upset.:)
Terry
H sounds like a personal attack to me.
--slade
-Original Message-
From: David Miller
Sent: Sunday, 16 January, 2005 22.17
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now
then give it
time and
H sounds like a personal attack to me.
--slade
-Original Message-
From: David Miller
Sent: Sunday, 16 January, 2005 22.17
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now
then give it
time and stop squealing like a stuck pig.
--
"Let your speech be always with
Jeff wrote:
> Considering that most here reject God's Law
Try to speak only for yourself. My perspective is that most people on
TruthTalk accept God's law.
Jeff wrote:
> It's obvious that no one here is obedient to God
It might be obvious to you, but not to me. I am obedient to God, and I
be
Jeff wrote:
> So now TT has become a DICTATORSHIP.
> Whats next mass crucifixions of the
> dissenting members?
Lighten up, Jeff. No, TruthTalk has not become a dictatorship, and no mass
crucifixions are being planned. We have two moderators with very different
backgrounds. One of them is your
Kay wrote:
> I believe God allowed for ad hominem.
> "You vipers!" "You hypocrites!" I think
> those may have even been swear words
> back then, too.
No, they were not swear words, but you are right about God allowing ad
hominem statements. As I have said many times, it is not a sin to make an
16, 2005
2:24 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Moderators Now
You reemergence is appreciated!
-- slade
-Original Message-
From: Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, 16 January, 2005
15.04
: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005
12:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators
Now
DAVEH: Just thinking out loud,
Jeff. :-)
Jeff Powers wrote:
Or maybe the renegade, rebellious
bikerDAVEH: Sounds like somebody
familiar
You
reemergence is appreciated!
--
slade
-Original Message-From: Lance MuirSent:
Sunday, 16 January, 2005 15.04
uthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2005 12:00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators
Now
Jeff Powers wrote:
I also have to comment on Davids mention of
LAW.
Considering that most here reject God's Law, you are
all a bunch of Lawless individu
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005
11:00 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Moderators Now
Jeff Powers wrote:
I also have to comment on Davids
mention of LAW.
Considering that most here reject
God's Law, you are all a b
Jeff Powers wrote:
I also have to comment on Davids mention
of LAW.
Considering that most here reject God's
Law, you are all a bunch of Lawless individuals, so why do we now need
the "Laws of David"? It's obvious that no one here is obedient to God
(I include myself) as He expect
DAVEH: Just thinking out loud, Jeff. :-)
Jeff Powers wrote:
Or maybe the renegade, rebellious biker
DAVEH: Sounds like somebody familiar
with the right cause
DAVEH: Jesus is always the right cause
but the wrong methods?
DAVEH: Some think Mormonism
-Original Message-
So now TT has become a DICTATORSHIP. Whats next mass crucifixions of
the
dissenting members? I would almost be in favor of it, except, I know
from my
time on here that several ppl are protected and can be as asinine as
they
choose and get away with
T Moderation is not government,
IMO.
Kay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005 22.21
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now
Kay wrote:
> Personally, I think having
I also have to comment on Davids mention of
LAW.
Considering that most here reject God's Law, you are all
a bunch of Lawless individuals, so why do we now need the "Laws of David"? It's
obvious that no one here is obedient to God (I include myself) as He expects it,
so what makes anyone thi
C'mon,
Kay... You did this on purpose. KNOCK IT OFF!!!
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Slade
HensonSent: Sunday, 16 January, 2005 09.11To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two Moder
Just had to do this:as·i·nine ( P ) Pronunciation Key
(s-nn)adj.Utterly stupid or silly: asinine behavior.Of, relating to,
or resembling an
ass.[Latin
asinnus, of an ass, from asinus,
ass.]-
be "taboo..."
whatever that means.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Powers
Sent: Sunday, 16 January, 2005 08.56
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now
So now TT has become a DICTATORSHIP. Whats next mass crucifixions of the
dissenting members? I would almost be in favor of it, ex
So now TT has become a DICTATORSHIP. Whats next mass crucifixions of the
dissenting members? I would almost be in favor of it, except, I know from my
time on here that several ppl are protected and can be as asinine as they
choose and get away with it. While others get pounced on for minor reaso
not government,
IMO.
Kay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Saturday, 15 January, 2005 22.21
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Moderators Now
Kay wrote:
> Personally, I think having to have a babysitter fo
David Miller wrote:
So effective immediately, both Slade
and I will rigorously enforce the no ad hominem argument rule. This means
no personal attacks against TruthTalk members is allowed.
DAVEH: May I assume that doesn't apply to those responding to my
posts :-)
5.
Kay wrote:
> Personally, I think having to have a babysitter for
> a group of adults is one of the most ridiculous things
> I've heard ofespecially amongst those who
> would call themselves brethren...
It not a babysitter. It is government. God has ordained government for the
church as well
Personally, I think having to have a babysitter for a group of adults is one
of the most ridiculous things I've heard ofespecially amongst those who
would call themselves brethren...
Kay...in protest
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
51 matches
Mail list logo
