ade
Henson
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2005
13:23
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] ad
honanemium rule and the moral majority
I appreciate you nonetheless, Izzy.
Humbling is what one needs most. However, I still think one moderator is
all that's needed. One
One moderator.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005
12:55 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] ad
honanemium rule and the moral majority
To which do you disagree
W. C. Fields also had a good ear for 'tone'. Nobody
listened to him either, Slade.
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2005 08:59
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] ad honanemium
rule and the moral majori
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2005 13:23
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] ad honanemium
rule and the moral majority
I
appreciate you nonetheless, Izzy. Humbling is what one needs most.
However, I still think one moderator is all that's needed. One
Moderator. One Owner
moral majority
To
which do you disagree?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Sunday, 16 January, 2005
13.25To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE:
[TruthTalk] ad honanemium rule and the
To
which do you disagree?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Sunday, 16 January, 2005 13.25To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] ad honanemium
rule and the moral majority
I
I respectfully disagree. J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005
12:23 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] ad
honanemium rule and the moral majority
I appreciate you nonetheless
emium rule and
the moral majority
My perception is that
Slade has his own tone deafness when it comes to those who agree with
him. That’s why it’s good to have balance with both Slade and David.
Izzy
It's already happened. This is the issue I
had with David. The words said do not matter as much to me as to David. I hear
the tone behind the words far better than David does while he sees the words
used far better than I. When I tried to speak with others about the tone (even
the implied
In a message dated 1/16/2005 6:02:22 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's already happened. This is the issue I had with David. The words said do not matter as much to me as to David. I hear the tone behind the words far better than David does while he sees the words used far
It will
happen. Anyone one to bet?
It's
already happened. This is the issue I had with David. The words said do not
matter as much to me as to David. I hear the tone behind the words far better
than David does while he sees the words used far better than I. When I tried to
speak with ot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/15/2005 9:54:52 PM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
slade
The ad honimen rule is one who no that has been invoked before.
DAVEH:
Hey John..I fully concur. Nowp
In a message dated 1/15/2005 9:54:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-- slade
The ad honimen rule is one who no that has been invoked before.
DAVEH: Hey John..I fully concur. Nowplease explain what it means so I can decide whether or not to retract my agreement..
13 matches
Mail list logo
