You constant anger has brought
us to this are
DAVEH: FWIW..I don't know why you (or any other TTers who may
think similar) think I am angry. FTR..I am NOT angry. Nor do I
rise to anger easily. I just don't quite understand why some TTers
are so quick to ascribe certain things to
hing. DH did not mean what CD took him to mean. Iz actually apologized. DM, IMO, handled it badly as did Perry. OK guys, enough is enough.
- Original Message -
From: Dean Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 06, 2006 06:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about fr
.
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 06, 2006 06:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about
free speech thingy
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk
- Original Message -
From: Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/6/2006 1:32:00 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
cd: Davh I make decisions in life due to past experience-as such I will not change a statement until the past belief is
:22:54 PM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
I know you supported
fighting words DavH-go and see for yourself.You have often spoken of a
failing memory now you are certain I am lying about a event that
happened appx. 2 yrs ago?Are you so sure?Beside I do not
- Original Message -
From: Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/5/2006 1:22:54 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
I know you supported fighting words DavH-go and see for yourself.You have often spoken of a failing memory now you are
n Moore wrote:
-
Original Message -
From:
Dave
Hansen
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
2/4/2006 1:31:57 PM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
If you
cannot find such, then I will apologize to you.
DAVEH:
- Original Message -
From: Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/4/2006 1:31:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
If you cannot find such, then I will apologize to you.DAVEH: YikesDid I really write that (yes)...I need
From: Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
You apparently think that we think we have free speech here. We don't.
DAVEH: Good. We can agree on that then. I was under the impression that
you
Innocent until
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 04, 2006 13:31
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about
free speech thingy
If you cannot find such, then
I will apologize to you.DAVEH:
Yikes
If you cannot find such, then I will
apologize to you.
DAVEH: YikesDid I really write that (yes)...I need to
reread stuff before I post it! What I meant to say Dean, is that it is
YOU who should apologize to me IF you cannot find evidence of me saying
to the effect that I suppo
DAVEH: You have only been a moderator one day, Deanand already you are posting lies. If you will post my comments that suggest that I supported this right to harm others, then I will apologize to you. If you cannot find such, then I will apologize to you. Until then, it is obvious
David Miller wrote:
>> free speech has limitations.
>> We recognize that.
DAVEH:
> Really! Who determines those limitations?
> ... those things are determined by law.
Yes, and the foundation of law is God, not whatever men decide the law
should be.
DaveH wrote:
> On the other hand, it seems th
Well said, Perry.
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Perry
Locke
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 09:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about
free speech thingy
Dave, sounds like you'er still a little sore for getting boote
erstand you guys invited James White. Why not the Street Preachers too?
David Miller.
- Original Message -----
From: Dave
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
DAVEH: Why are street preachers such
- Original Message -
From: Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 3:14:32 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
they already sent their best debaters out but they didn't stay around long:-)had James White for breakfast and d
Good on ya mate!
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 01, 2006 09:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about
free speech thingy
- Original Message -
From:
To
they already sent their best debaters out but
they didn't stay around long:-)
had James White for
breakfast and didn't break a sweat:-)
DAVEH: Perhaps they (the debaters )
wanted to go inside to listen to what James
White had to say.
:-)
Dean Moore wrote:
ssage -
From:
Dave
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
Monday, January 30, 2006 12:01 AM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
DAVEH: Why are street preachers such proponents of
your buildings, and debated them in a public forum? I understand you guys invited James White. Why not the Street Preachers too?
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Dave
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs abou
David Miller.
-
Original Message -
From:
Dave
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
Monday, January 30, 2006 12:01 AM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
DAVEH: Why are street preachers such proponents of fre
- Original Message -
From: David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 12:09:34 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
Dave, free speech has limitations. We recognize that. One cannot yell fire in a crowded theater when there is no
Judy's theology, David, may be 'the spirit of the Antichrist'. I believe
that it is.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: January 31, 2006 12:20
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
RE: [Truth
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
Just for the record -- Debbie's point is without debate. The kind of SP that calls names and passes ha
er played the game 'hangman', David?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 29, 2006 17:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
Lance, please do not forward posts to us that use the F word.
As for the offense issue, th
il.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 10:40
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about
free speech thingy
Just for the record -- Debbie's point is without
debate. The kind of SP that calls names and passes harsh judgment
is neither biblical nor deserving of cons
ject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about
free speech thingy
DAVEH: Why are street preachers such proponents of
free speech when it benefits them.. You don't really believe in free speech, do you...yet
are so opposed to it...please do not forward posts to
us that use the F
cd: John I am not even going to address this as I hope you understand better at some point in time.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 10:41:04 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
'deceived by the working of iniquity'? 'no
understanding of the issues'?
Please elaborate on 'the working of iniquity',
David. Please help Debbie and myself understand the issues, David.
Lance
PS
David Miller wrote:
RE: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
Lance, please do not forward posts to us that use the F word.
David Miller
I have a reasonable expectation that they should obey the law. Speech is
meant to be responded to with speech, not with illega
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 2:40 PM
Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: January 29, 2006 13:47
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] the FWs about f
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
Lance, please do not forward posts to us that use the F word.
As for the offense issue, the offense is purely offense of the gospel and
doctrine of Christ. If we did exactly the same thing but the message was
that everyone is free
32 matches
Mail list logo
