A man may be Theologically knowing while spiritually DEAD.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me get this straight JD. By Rad Fundies you are talking about people who believe Genesis as it is written - Right??PS What is wrong with the Carroll Dean's and the Pat Robertsons of
ORY.ORG>Sent: March 22, 2006 10:50Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Lance wrote: One's time would be better spent reading
some noteworthy novelists than noteworthy creationists. Lift up Jesus and, creationISM, will fall away as it should. I can't say that I agree with y
al Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 22, 2006 14:24 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on CreationismLet me get this straight JD. By Rad Fundies you are talking about people who believe Genesis as it is written - Right??PS What is wrong with t
Some charge that RW has No Absolute Morals!RW says "I have to distinguish plainly between personal theories and interpretations and the majority conviction of my Church"So opinions of Men as in the Majority consensus of his CHURCH is his Absolute guide!
I would rather FROTH at the mouth and attempt something than be a nothing, a 0 as far as evangelism goes![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Paul opposed the intolerant legalists in the church and so will I while, at the same time, writing the words of Romans 14. He is one of my mentors -- I will do
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Let me get this straight JD.By Rad Fundies you are talking about people who believe Genesis as it iswritten
- Right??PS What is wrong with the Carroll Dean's and the Pat Robertsons of thisworl
>Sent: March 21, 2006 13:12Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Yup is right, but how does he get from this thought to the idea that creationism should not be considered in schools? I hate it when theologians are embarassed of giving glory to the Creator in school.
David Mi
froth around the edges of the lips.
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then maybe you can flesh it out for the rest of us.
I am sure Lance can not/will not
I am sure we can see the difference, but just what are the symptoms of that particular
Are you a grad of the Ur Mutha Wears Kombat Boots school of apologetics?One thing is for sure you always deal with the real issues![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:froth around the edges of the lips.-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then maybe
So which fundamentalist version of creation do you support. That A E were spirit people. A 6000 year date or a 10,000 or an "unknown" e.t. ? The version that says it took God 144 hours to speak words that canbe spoken in 24 seconds !!! I just did it in 24 big ones !! including a drink of water
Someone said render to Cesear what is Cesear's [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:So which fundamentalist version of creation do you support. That A E were spirit people. A 6000 year date or a 10,000 or an "unknown" e.t. ? The version that says it took God 144 hours to speak words that canbe spoken in
I surmised as much JD; my point being that religious
ppl have many
and varied points of view about anything and everything
and this is no
measure by which to gauge what is needful or
true.
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:20:02 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you even know what this thread is
We are still waitig !
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Someone said
render to Cesear what is Cesear's [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So which fundamentalist version of creation do you support. That A E were spirit people. A 6000 year date or a
I'm talking about fundy creationist versions in the school systemsand you are talking about religious people!!! Amazing
Maybe we should install a different creationist version for every major school system ... I am sure we can find enough fundy ideas to go around. That way , you
So true, so true KD
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:54:02 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
A man may be Theologically knowing while spiritually
DEAD.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Let me get this straight JD.
By Rad Fundies you are talking about
Some ppl are willing to let God be God JD
The secret things belong to the Lord and as Kevin says;
let the ppl serving
Caesar fumble around and follow whatever way the wind
is blowing.
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:34:20 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Someone said
render to
Well of course you couldn't tell them the Truth JD
could you?
I mean after all He is a Rock of offense and it might
offend the Muslims
We are responsible to instruct our own children - The
public schools don't
care what view anyone on TT holds do they?
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:22:56 +
Sure because this is what you are talking about JD; ppl
of faith believe God's Word and wait for Him
to give them understanding. Religious ppl have
all kinds of theories, big bang, black holes, and on and on.
You don't need to worry about fundies or school systems
JD because you don't have
Let's have them Teach Dominion Theology in school ; )[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I'm talking about fundy creationist versions in the school systemsand you are talking about religious people!!! Amazing Maybe we should install a different creationist version for every major school system
Why don't one of you POTENTATES fix it. Or get your self some Pope or Protestant for a Politician. This would be the specialty of the Reformed Catholics, they are gonna bring in the kingdom ya know they are the promised people (JEWS) and they are gonna bring us all kicking and screaming into
The schools have bigger problems to deal with. But maybe that is the planJudy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure because this is what you are talking about JD; ppl of faith believe God's Word and wait for Him to give them understanding. Religious ppl have all kinds of theories, big bang,
what on earth are you talking about, Judy !!! Secret things ??? So you decided to just stay off subject? Whatever.
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some ppl are willing to let God be God JD
The secret things belong to the Lord and as Kevin
And sure enough, you did this very thing -- Be sure to answer with "the right one, John -- duh !! Your wording a little different, but it is the same ridiculous non-answer.
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well of course you couldn't tell them
myth (this writersubjugates us to
her narrow notions, permits usnofaith in God per
se)
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..
jt:
ppl of faith believe
God's Word
..tt evidence
suggestsher nn's ain't
biblical
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:29:20 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (this writersubjugates us
to her narrow notions,
permits usnofaith in God per se)
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..*implicitly*
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:44:01 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..tt evidence
suggestsher nn's ain't
biblical
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:29:20 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (this writersubjugates us
to her narrow notions,
permits usnofaith in God
..partic as "Word" isher trick
word
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:50:29 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..*implicitly*
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:44:01 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..tt evidence
suggestsher nn's ain't
biblical
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:29:20 -0700
"Believe in God's word" is fundy code for "believe as I do."
When we have been dispersed, take with you the knowledge that not one single Rad Fundy has given any of us a clue as to what "doctrine" they are talking about.
You must obey the commandments !!! they yell to the others. What
Well Mr. Teacher - what is the "right
answer?"
An opinion that is the same as yours? Why can't
we deal with a little reality here at the last.
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:26:31 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And sure enough, you did this very thing -- Be sure to
answer with "the right one,
JD you are not keeping good company here - but then as
the old adage goes"birds of a feather"
You really should discuss what you know about and it is
obvious that you know nothing about
Rad Fundy's "Walking after the Spirit" or being a "doer
of God's Word" rather than a deceived
hearer only.
The world in which we live would reject any mention of God in the evolutionary process, IMO. But creationism in the schools? Could that not be considered the beginnings of a fanatical fundamentalist take-over of the culture?
But to allow a mere statement that suggests God is somehow in control
: March 21, 2006 12:15
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
And for most of the history of Christianity ... there's been an awareness
that a belief that everything depends on the creative act of God is quite
compatible with a degree of uncertainty or latitude about how precisely
John wrote:
The world in which we live would reject
any mention of God in the evolutionary process,
IMO. But creationism in the schools?
Could
that not be considered the beginnings of a fanatical
fundamentalist take-over of the culture?
ROTFLOL. I sure hope youwere being facetious on
DM says In case you did not notice, the fundamentalists are not causing
the acknowledgement of our Creator to be forbidden in schools. It is
the liberal loonies like this Archbishop of Canterbury who are doing
this.
Some around here are concerned that there are FUNDIES lurking around
every
Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I do. I know this -- there isn't a single view of creationism that is agreed upon by the whole church.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John wrote:
The world in which we live would reject
JD says Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I do. He too is afraid of fundamentalists? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I do. I know this -- there isn't a single view of creationism that is agreed upon by the whole church. jd--
Well --- I really do not know his reasoning.. hence the wording "perhaps " I have a friend, a math teacher in high school. He had to teach biology for a semester. He decided he was put his career on the line and make a statement ,in class, that was pro-creation. Before he made his
If fundamental Christianity is a problem for you, of what spirit are you? iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 4:15 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams
Whom do you ask the guys who think DM Judy are Fundies?ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If fundamental Christianity is a problem for you, of what spirit are you? iz-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Tuesday, March 21,
201 - 239 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
