On 2015-11-10 07:56, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> On 09.11.2015 23:01, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > On 2015-11-09 21:03, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> >> I will try to sum up again the things that need to be done:
> >> * The invoice/credit note type will be removed
> >> * The se
On 09.11.2015 23:01, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2015-11-09 21:03, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
>> I will try to sum up again the things that need to be done:
>> * The invoice/credit note type will be removed
>> * The self-billing like it is defined by tax law can be implemented with
>> a
On 2015-11-09 21:03, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> I will try to sum up again the things that need to be done:
> * The invoice/credit note type will be removed
> * The self-billing like it is defined by tax law can be implemented with
> a boolean field that marks the "self-billing" and
Am Montag, 9. November 2015 21:04:32 UTC+1 schrieb Timitos:
>
> On 09.11.2015 20:18, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > On 2015-11-09 19:34, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> >> Am 09.11.2015 18:45 schrieb "Cédric Krier"
> >>> On 2015-11-09 18:21, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> > I don
On 09.11.2015 20:18, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2015-11-09 19:34, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
>> Am 09.11.2015 18:45 schrieb "Cédric Krier" :
>>> On 2015-11-09 18:21, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> I don't agree, negative amount is a credit note not a cancellation.
> The
On 09.11.2015 17:14, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2015-11-09 16:55, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
>> On 09.11.2015 16:28, Cédric Krier wrote:
>>> On 2015-11-09 16:00, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
On 21.10.2015 15:08, Cédric Krier wrote:
> As already stated having invoice/cre
On 2015-11-09 19:34, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> Am 09.11.2015 18:45 schrieb "Cédric Krier" :
> >
> > On 2015-11-09 18:21, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> > > > I don't agree, negative amount is a credit note not a cancellation.
> > > > The cancellation of an invoice is manage
Am 09.11.2015 18:45 schrieb "Cédric Krier" :
>
> On 2015-11-09 18:21, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> > > I don't agree, negative amount is a credit note not a cancellation.
> > > The cancellation of an invoice is managed the cancellation move. This
is
> > > the only way to ensure that the
On 2015-11-09 18:21, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> > I don't agree, negative amount is a credit note not a cancellation.
> > The cancellation of an invoice is managed the cancellation move. This is
> > the only way to ensure that the cancellation is really a cancellation.
> > The amounts
On 09.11.2015 17:55, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2015-11-09 17:43, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
>> On 09.11.2015 17:14, Cédric Krier wrote:
>>> On 2015-11-09 16:55, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
On 09.11.2015 16:28, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2015-11-09 16:00, 'Korbinian Prei
On 2015-11-09 17:43, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> On 09.11.2015 17:14, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > On 2015-11-09 16:55, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> >> On 09.11.2015 16:28, Cédric Krier wrote:
> >>> On 2015-11-09 16:00, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> On 21.10.2015
On 09.11.2015 17:14, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2015-11-09 16:55, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
>> On 09.11.2015 16:28, Cédric Krier wrote:
>>> On 2015-11-09 16:00, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
On 21.10.2015 15:08, Cédric Krier wrote:
> As already stated having invoice/cre
On 2015-11-09 16:55, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> On 09.11.2015 16:28, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > On 2015-11-09 16:00, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> >> On 21.10.2015 15:08, Cédric Krier wrote:
> >>> As already stated having invoice/credit note distinction prevents to put
> >>> i
On 09.11.2015 16:28, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2015-11-09 16:00, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
>> On 21.10.2015 15:08, Cédric Krier wrote:
>>> Cancellation already exists, it is not activate on the posted customer
>>> invoice (but on supplier) because it is not allowed in every country.
>>>
On 2015-11-09 16:00, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> On 21.10.2015 15:08, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > Cancellation already exists, it is not activate on the posted customer
> > invoice (but on supplier) because it is not allowed in every country.
> > Of course, a standard module that makes the
On 21.10.2015 15:08, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2015-10-21 14:31, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
>> But now comes the interesting part. If this is the only case where tax
>> law talks about credit notes, how can we correct wrongly created invoice
>> documents?
>>
>> And this is where we have
On 2015-10-21 14:31, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote:
> But now comes the interesting part. If this is the only case where tax
> law talks about credit notes, how can we correct wrongly created invoice
> documents?
>
> And this is where we have to switch to commercial common sense. I you
> w
On 21.10.2015 12:26, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 2015-10-21 12:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> 2015-10-20 21:53 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
>>> On 2015-10-20 21:17, Jordi Esteve wrote:
El 20/10/15 a les 19:24, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
> On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
On 2015-10-21 13:40, Jordi Esteve (Zikzakmedia) wrote:
> El 21/10/15 a les 13:05, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
> >Especially if we
> >keep using the right sequence based on the sign of the total amount
> >(different of my initial proposal).
> >
> Your new proposal is about having two different invoice s
El 21/10/15 a les 13:05, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
Back to the main topic, I think there are no problem for Spain that we
remove the distinction between invoice and credit note.
Exactly, no problem to remove the distinction between invoice and credit
note.
Especially if we
keep using the righ
On 2015-10-21 12:43, Raimon Esteve wrote:
> >> Confirmed. Credit note has different sequence in Spain and Catalonia.
> >
> > "has" doesn't mean it is a strict requirement.
>
> It's strict difference between invoice and credit note.
>
> > By the way, what is the definition of an Invoice and a Cred
On 2015-10-21 12:59, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
> If I understand correctly this document in fact there is other cases
> where different sequences are mandatory (rectifications, intragroup
> invoices, something about the travel agencies, etc).
>
> So wouldn't it be more clever to put the sequence on th
* Albert Cervera i Areny [2015-10-20 19:07 +0200]:
2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
Hi,
I was discussing about issue5016 [1] which is indeed a continuation of
issue4410 [2] and I came with the idea that we should remove the
invoice/credit_note type on the Invoice object.
Such types ar
>> Confirmed. Credit note has different sequence in Spain and Catalonia.
>
> "has" doesn't mean it is a strict requirement.
It's strict difference between invoice and credit note.
> By the way, what is the definition of an Invoice and a Credit Note? If
> you say they have to have a diffrent seque
On 2015-10-21 12:02, Raimon Esteve wrote:
> 2015-10-21 9:25 GMT+02:00 Raimon Esteve :
> > 2015-10-20 21:53 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
> >> On 2015-10-20 21:17, Jordi Esteve wrote:
> >>> El 20/10/15 a les 19:24, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
> >>> >On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> >>> >>
On 2015-10-21 12:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> 2015-10-20 21:53 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
> > On 2015-10-20 21:17, Jordi Esteve wrote:
> >> El 20/10/15 a les 19:24, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
> >> >On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> >> >>2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
2015-10-20 21:53 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
> On 2015-10-20 21:17, Jordi Esteve wrote:
>> El 20/10/15 a les 19:24, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
>> >On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> >>2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
>> >>>Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>I was discussing about issue5016 [1]
2015-10-21 9:25 GMT+02:00 Raimon Esteve :
> 2015-10-20 21:53 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
>> On 2015-10-20 21:17, Jordi Esteve wrote:
>>> El 20/10/15 a les 19:24, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
>>> >On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>>> >>2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
>>> >>>Hi,
>
2015-10-20 21:53 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
> On 2015-10-20 21:17, Jordi Esteve wrote:
>> El 20/10/15 a les 19:24, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
>> >On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> >>2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
>> >>>Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>I was discussing about issue5016 [1]
On 2015-10-20 21:17, Jordi Esteve wrote:
> El 20/10/15 a les 19:24, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
> >On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> >>2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I was discussing about issue5016 [1] which is indeed a continuation of
> >>>issue4410 [
El 20/10/15 a les 19:24, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
Hi,
I was discussing about issue5016 [1] which is indeed a continuation of
issue4410 [2] and I came with the idea that we should remove the
invoice/cred
On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> 2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was discussing about issue5016 [1] which is indeed a continuation of
> > issue4410 [2] and I came with the idea that we should remove the
> > invoice/credit_note type on the Invoice obje
2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier :
> Hi,
>
> I was discussing about issue5016 [1] which is indeed a continuation of
> issue4410 [2] and I came with the idea that we should remove the
> invoice/credit_note type on the Invoice object.
> Such types are really a big constraint that prevent us to
Hi,
I was discussing about issue5016 [1] which is indeed a continuation of
issue4410 [2] and I came with the idea that we should remove the
invoice/credit_note type on the Invoice object.
Such types are really a big constraint that prevent us to generate mixed
documents (half invoice and half cred
34 matches
Mail list logo
