Hi Jeremy,
This is interesting stuff...
The other thought was about how a component could expose a management
interface. One option would be to support binding.jmx for
attachment to a service; however, this would require a componentType
sidefile. Another would be to support an @Management
Hi,
What I have done for the time being, is to use DynamicMBean and reflection
to expose any POJO as a managed bean. It is in
org.apache.tuscany.standalone.server.management.jmx.instrument.reflect.ReflectedDynamicMBean.
By default it excludes methods and properties on java.lang.Object. There
I am using it only for IoUtils.closeQuietly :) If you want, I can take it
off.
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r490620 -
/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/runtime/standalone/server.start/pom.xml
Date:
On Dec 28, 2006, at 8:20 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Hi,
What I have done for the time being, is to use DynamicMBean and
reflection to expose any POJO as a managed bean. It is in
org.apache.tuscany.standalone.server.management.jmx.instrument.reflect
.ReflectedDynamicMBean. By default
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Standalone server
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:43:12 -0800
On Dec 28, 2006, at 8:20 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Hi,
What I have done for the time being, is to use
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-450?page=all ]
Yang ZHONG updated TUSCANY-450:
---
Attachment: fidelity.xsd
fidelity.xml
XML isn't correctly loaded, although element
ElementOfSimpleTypeWithSDOOppositePropertyType model may
How that description is done is really part of the component
programming
model so I would suggest moving that to the appropriate container
extensions (primarily the java and system containers for now - it's
probably common to both).
Would the components annotate the ops and properties as
Joel,
I think it would be fairly straightforward to write a generic JMX dynamic
MBean based on introspecting the annotated members (ops, properties etc),
quite similar to the reflection one already in the source tree. I think one
key question is would these annotations be specific to tuscany,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-445?page=all ]
Yang ZHONG updated TUSCANY-445:
---
Attachment: fidelity.xsd
fidelity.xml
Wrong Type is generated/used to load XML.
fidelity.xsd and fidelity.xml are attached for the following
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-449?page=comments#action_12461247
]
Yang ZHONG commented on TUSCANY-449:
ComplexTypeSubstitutionGroupBaseType is used to load
tns:ElementSubstitutionGroupExtends so
http://searchwebservices.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid26_gci1236569,00.html?track=NL-110ad=575643asrc=EM_NLN_868698uid=5532089
SOA standards SCA and SDO homeless for holidays
By Rich Seeley, News Writer
28 Dec 2006 | SearchWebServices.com
Part one of our look at emerging SOA
Meeraj,
I think it would be fairly straightforward to write a generic JMX
dynamic
MBean based on introspecting the annotated members (ops, properties
etc),
quite similar to the reflection one already in the source tree. I think
one
key question is would these annotations be specific to
Joel,
This is what I am thinking as well, maybe tuscany server is started as part
of a bootstrap runtime that includes the management service and it is made
available to any other runtimes that is spawned there of.
Anyway, to start with I have added some stuff into core and spi
Hang on guys, there's a difference between the Server part that
clients talk to and the ManagementService that bridges components
into the management space.
The TuscanyServer can start the agent for the management client.
With JMX, this would be the MBeanServer that we are using for all
14 matches
Mail list logo
