This should be fixed in the latest trunk code, is it possible for you to try
that?
...ant
On 8/18/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Manu,
>
> Thanks for investigating the problem and figuring out this work
> around. It
> worked after I changed the interface element to int
I'm going to need to add it back to start getting sample release candidates
out. From what you've said this is going to break the continuum builds right
which is a shame but not sure what i can do about that. Both the bin and src
distros are created with the maven assembly plugin, there are some An
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-1548:
---
Fix Version/s: Cpp-Next
> multi-valued properties should require indexed xpath
> --
I've tried including it in the sca pom.xml but that doesn't seem to help,
only when set at the cmd line as an environment variable does it fix the
problem. Anyone know why not?
...ant
On 8/15/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can also increase the memory options in the sca
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
A few questions.
[snip]
ant elder wrote:
I'm not very keen at all on doing that. Couldn't we actually put the
code in
our svn instead of using SVN externals (if necessary the Geronimo
guys could
use SVN externals if they really want it).
Necessary yes, as far
I'd like to rename binding-ajax to binding-dwr, as Ajax is a really
generic term, and it will make clear that this binding is actually using
the DWR (Direct Web Remoting) protocol.
Thoughts?
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To unsubscrib
ant elder wrote:
On 8/3/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Taking that line of thought and you hit the long thread associated with:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200701.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
which is what I
I've spent some time reviewing our various modules and noticed that a
number of packages do not follow our current package naming convention:
org.apache.tuscany.sca..*
I'm starting to fix them, I should be ready to commit these fixes before
we cut the release branch next week.
--
Jean-Sebast
The last comments have been in favour of keeping things as-is so how about
just doing nothing and letting this thread die.
...ant
On 8/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 8/3/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> ant eld
On 8/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > A few questions.
> >
> > [snip]
> > ant elder wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not very keen at all on doing that. Couldn't we actually put the
> >> code in
> >> our svn instead of using SVN externals (if necessa
On 8/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to rename binding-ajax to binding-dwr, as Ajax is a really
> generic term, and it will make clear that this binding is actually using
> the DWR (Direct Web Remoting) protocol.
>
> Thoughts?
Right now that it uses DWR is an
ant elder wrote:
The last comments have been in favour of keeping things as-is so how about
just doing nothing and letting this thread die.
...ant
Here are the last comments from the different people who contributed to
this thread:
- Mike, http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.ap
On 8/13/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/13/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > +1 for 21st as the target. Can I suggest we take some time (assuming
> > there
> > > is some) on the 20th to test the samples and check through the
> > re
On 8/17/07, Naveen MC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to execute a Sample web application (calculator-webapp) from
> the
> tuscany-sca-0.91-incubating Release. I am using "Tomcat V 6.0" as a
> application server. The original sample which is there in the release will
> get execut
ant elder wrote:
On 8/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to rename binding-ajax to binding-dwr, as Ajax is a really
generic term, and it will make clear that this binding is actually using
the DWR (Direct Web Remoting) protocol.
Thoughts?
Right now that
On 8/18/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> >> snip...
> >>
> >>> I have temporarily disabled the build of modules binding-sca-axis2 and
> >>>
> distributed impl as they are preventing me to build.
>
>
> >>
>
Sebastien wrote :
>IMO application developers shouldn't have to suffer from the
complexity of XML...
>How about supporting composites without namespace declarations at all?
I'm trying to understand all the proposals here, what would be the
side effects of going with your proposal ? This seems like
Luciano Resende wrote:
Sebastien wrote :
IMO application developers shouldn't have to suffer from the
complexity of XML...
How about supporting composites without namespace declarations at all?
I'm trying to understand all the proposals here, what would be the
side effects of
I've committed a fix for calculator-distributed. I fired up my FC6 and it
worked OK there. Let me know if it still causes issues.
Simon
It works for me too now. Thanks!
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I've committed a fix for calculator-distributed. I fired up my FC6
and it
worked OK there. Let me know if it still causes issues.
Simon
It works for me too now. Thanks!
This is weird, it worked once, and now after rebuilding all the modules
from sc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino resolved TUSCANY-1296.
-
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
I just tried on Redhat Enterprise Linux 5,
Hi,
Here is my opinion about the three options:
1) -0.5 on A)
2) +1 on B)
3) -0.5 on C)
A) violates the SCA assembly spec.
2535 ... New interface types, implementation types and binding types that
are defined using
2536 this extensibility model, which are not part of these SCA
specifications
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521011
]
Sunny Ip commented on TUSCANY-1541:
---
We have found the line that causes this exception, in the invokeTarget() met
Looks like option B is more "spec compliant" and more aligned to the
XML namespaces usage rules. Should I give it a try ?
On 8/19/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my opinion about the three options:
>
> 1) -0.5 on A)
> 2) +1 on B)
> 3) -0.5 on C)
>
> A) violates the SC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende reassigned TUSCANY-978:
---
Assignee: Luciano Resende
> Tuscany WSDL2Java can't handle WSDL fault messages
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-978.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed under revision #56750. Also added the attached wsdl in test case
Hi, everybody.
I checked out the latest code today (567518). Gone over the new code, a
question came to me.
class: ReallySmallRuntimeBuilder method: createContributionService has changed
at its beginning from
" = XMLInputFactory.newInstance()"
to
" = registry.getExtensionPoint(XMLInputFactory
27 matches
Mail list logo
