[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1053) Use a Tuscany namespace for all non-spec'd Tuscany extensions

2007-08-22 Thread Luciano Resende (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-1053. -- Resolution: Fixed Check discussion thread for discussion on aprach taken http://ww

Re: [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1053) Use a Tuscany namespace for all non-spec'd Tuscany extensions

2007-08-22 Thread Luciano Resende
Done under revision #568830 On 8/22/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jean-Sebastien, > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > > > > > Looks like option (B) is the most preferred option with: > > - one -1 > > - five +1 > > - one "more spec compliant" > > > > Do we need more technical discu

Re: Renaming binding-ajax to binding-dwr?

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Simon Nash wrote: How about binding-ajax-dwr? This seems to go well with binding-ws-axis2. That seems to contradict what we said before as: - DWR is a transport protocol (like JSON, another protocol) - but Axis2 is an implementation. Simon Mike Edwards wrote: +1 to the rename. Best to

Re: SCA distribution is really big now

2007-08-22 Thread Venkata Krishnan
+1 for "I think we should just document how to copy the required JARs to the Tomcat lib folder and run the stripped down WARs this way, assuming that it works". We anyways have the READMEs where we put in documentation on how to run the samples. Adding this step for webapps seems fine to me -Ven

Re: Question on extension-helper and how to register extensions with specific QNames

2007-08-22 Thread Luciano Resende
Well, i gave it a try, and I was able to get further by creating and registering a new module activator that extended BindingsActivator and overriding the getBindingQName method. On 8/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm updating all Tuscany extensions that are non-spec'd to use

Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1499) Core wiring framework should create pseudo-services and pseudo-references for callbacks

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Simon Nash wrote: Sorry for the delay in replying. I was away with no access to email. Comments inline. Simon Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Nash wrote: See inline. Simon Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Nash wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Nash wrote: Sor

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1500) Many callback tests don't run

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1500: Attachment: patch2 Here is patch2 for this JIRA. It enables the callback-id test in the build and

Re: XQuery implementation scenarios

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Hi, interesting topic :) so I've copied the tuscany-user list as well in case some of our users are interested too. Vasil Vasilev wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion about how we see the usage and the future of XQuery within the boundaries of SCA. What inspired me when I start

Connect errors in samples/*webapp Web Services samples

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
The calculator and helloworld Web Service WAR samples contain test cases that attempt to talk to the sample Webapp that they are contained in. I am not sure how they're supposed to work without taking the WAR and deploying it to a separate Tomcat instance by hand. Maybe I missed a step or my en

Re: SCA distribution is really big now

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I'll start a different thread to discuss the more long term support for . For now, comments inline to cover the immediate WAR size issue for the 0.99 release. Simon Laws wrote: [snip] 1 - what is in the war that is build from these samples - currently all of t

Re: SCA distribution is really big now

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
I'll start a different thread to discuss the more long term support for . For now, comments inline to cover the immediate WAR size issue for the 0.99 release. Simon Laws wrote: [snip] 1 - what is in the war that is build from these samples - currently all of the tuscany jars required [s

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1573) helloworld-jsronrpc sample does not run using .99 snapshot

2007-08-22 Thread haleh mahbod (JIRA)
helloworld-jsronrpc sample does not run using .99 snapshot -- Key: TUSCANY-1573 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1573 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Compon

FW: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1371) C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop)

2007-08-22 Thread Michael Yoder
Hi, I uploaded a patch for TUSCANY-1371. If someone could review and apply it that would be great. Thanks, Michael -Original Message- From: Michael Yoder (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:47 PM To: Michael Yoder Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1371

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1571) componentType files not supported for implementation.java

2007-08-22 Thread Raymond Feng (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521938 ] Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1571: --- I'll add it to svn and exclude it from the itest/pom.xml as it is no

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1571) componentType files not supported for implementation.java

2007-08-22 Thread Raymond Feng (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1571: - Assignee: Raymond Feng > componentType files not supported for implementation.java > --

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1371) C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop)

2007-08-22 Thread Michael Yoder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Yoder updated TUSCANY-1371: --- Attachment: TUSCANY-1371.txt This patch updates the DataObject::getProperty methods to the

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1571) componentType files not supported for implementation.java

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1571: Attachment: test1571.zip The test case is a modified version of the calculator sample from which

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1572) mvn on helloworld-ws-reference gets exception - used binary snapshot for .99

2007-08-22 Thread haleh mahbod (JIRA)
mvn on helloworld-ws-reference gets exception - used binary snapshot for .99 - Key: TUSCANY-1572 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1572 Project: Tuscany

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1571) componentType files not supported for implementation.java

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
componentType files not supported for implementation.java - Key: TUSCANY-1571 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1571 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Componen

Question on extension-helper and how to register extensions with specific QNames

2007-08-22 Thread Luciano Resende
I'm updating all Tuscany extensions that are non-spec'd to use a Tuscany namespace, and with this, some bindings or component types will be registered with the SCA 1.0 namespace (e.g binding-ejb) but others will use the Tuscany extension namespace (e.g binding-dwr). In this case, and mainly when t

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1570) ANT build of calcualator-webapp sample fails.. either remove it or fix it

2007-08-22 Thread haleh mahbod (JIRA)
ANT build of calcualator-webapp sample fails.. either remove it or fix it - Key: TUSCANY-1570 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1570 Project: Tuscany Is

[jira] Reopened: (TUSCANY-1500) Many callback tests don't run

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Nash reopened TUSCANY-1500: - Assignee: Simon Nash (was: Raymond Feng) Thanks for applying patch1. I'm reopening this JIR

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1500) Many callback tests don't run

2007-08-22 Thread Raymond Feng (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1500. --- Resolution: Fixed Patch applied. Thanks. > Many callback tests don't run > ---

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1500) Many callback tests don't run

2007-08-22 Thread Raymond Feng (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1500: - Assignee: Raymond Feng (was: Simon Nash) > Many callback tests don't run > ---

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1569) Minor fixes for implementation.osgi

2007-08-22 Thread Raymond Feng (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1569: - Assignee: ant elder (was: Raymond Feng) Assigned it back to Ant as he has already appl

Re: Difference between o.a.t.sca.scope and o.a.t.sca.core.scope

2007-08-22 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Sebastien. You're right on what I meant "used to be". IMO, these are in the grey areas as we're not very sure if we should extend the scoping support for other component implementation types. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Release management for next release, was: SCA 0.92 release?

2007-08-22 Thread haleh mahbod
Running calculator-script using the distribution, I see the following message. Result is OK, but this seems to be complaining about some package. I also saw this when I tried to run the same sample from within eclipse : sys-package-mgr*: can't create package cache dir, 'C:\tuscany-new\s ca-dist\tus

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1500) Many callback tests don't run

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1500: Patch Info: [Patch Available] > Many callback tests don't run > - > >

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1500) Many callback tests don't run

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1500: Attachment: patch1 Here is patch1 for this JIRA. It enables the callback-api test in the build

Re: binding-ws-axis2 callback processing

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Nash
I don't think we should go down the path of copying all the runtime information back into the model. In this specific case, omitting explicit callback binding information from the model means that the implementation runtime can make a choice. So there is no inconsistency with the runtime having

Re: SCA distribution is really big now

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Laws
On 8/22/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ant elder wrote: > > So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is > > currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's > > account for about 50MB: > > > > demo-allert-aggregator.war

Re: Difference between o.a.t.sca.scope and o.a.t.sca.core.scope

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, The o.a.t.sca.scope contains the interfaces/classes which used to be SPIs while the o.a.t.sca.core.scope contains implementation classes. Thanks, Raymond What you said here quickly started a whole new discussion about SPIs :) but I'd like to make I understand exact

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1569) Minor fixes for implementation.osgi

2007-08-22 Thread Raymond Feng (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1569: - Assignee: Raymond Feng (was: ant elder) > Minor fixes for implementation.osgi > -

[DAS] What's next for Tuscany DAS ?

2007-08-22 Thread Luciano Resende
With the DAS beta1 release out, I'd like to look forward to things that we want to do next for DAS. I think that there are still couple things that we can improve our core DAS features, the main one would be adding support for multiple DAS implementations, and review our SDO 2.1 APIs usage. As fo

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1569) Minor fixes for implementation.osgi

2007-08-22 Thread ant elder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder closed TUSCANY-1569. -- Resolution: Fixed Patch applied, thanks for the code Rajini. > Minor fixes for implementation.osgi

Re: Model printing - Causing problems in binding-sca-axis2

2007-08-22 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Thank you for catching this. Using the getters to dump objects seems to be destructive in some cases. I'll add a field introspection based approach to the PrintUtil. Raymond - Original Message - From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "tuscany-dev" Sent: Wednesday, August 2

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1569) Minor fixes for implementation.osgi

2007-08-22 Thread ant elder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-1569: -- Assignee: ant elder > Minor fixes for implementation.osgi >

Re: EJB binding still using OPENEJB snapshot

2007-08-22 Thread ant elder
If it comes to (b) then that sounds ok to me, better than not including the ejb binding in the release anyway. ...ant On 8/22/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I looked into this dependency last night as I was hoping the release of > Geronimo 2.0.1 could help us move to a

Re: EJB binding still using OPENEJB snapshot

2007-08-22 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, I looked into this dependency last night as I was hoping the release of Geronimo 2.0.1 could help us move to a stable level of OPENEJB. Here is what I found out: a) The Geronimo 2.0.1 release depends on a fixed revision (3.0.0-r562820) [1] of OPENEJB 3.0.0 stream, but it is not an offici

Re: SCA distribution is really big now

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
ant elder wrote: So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's account for about 50MB: demo-allert-aggregator.war demo-mortgage-creditcheck.war sample-helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp.war sample-helloworld

Re: Difference between o.a.t.sca.scope and o.a.t.sca.core.scope

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
ant elder wrote: On 8/22/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Doing either of these things would mean changing the current location of the spis of course. Are we ready for that kind of change? We're planning on cutting the branch for the release tomorrow so I'm not at all keen

Re: SCA distribution is really big now

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Laws
On 8/22/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is > currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's > account for about 50MB: > > demo-allert-aggregator.war > demo-mortgage-creditcheck.war > sample-h

binding-ws-axis2 callback processing

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Laws
In Axis2ReferenceBindingProvider constructor there is some code that looks for the callback associated with the reference, if there is one, to get the binding. From this it ultimately determines the from address for outgoing messages. // look for a matching callback binding WebServ

Re: Release management for next release, was: SCA 0.92 release?

2007-08-22 Thread ant elder
Please review the current distributions so we've a good shot and getting an RC1 on friday that passes. You can build the absolute latest distro's yourself from sca/distribution or I'm right now uploading pre-built ones to http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/SNAPSHOT/. This isn't complete and

EJB binding still using OPENEJB snapshot

2007-08-22 Thread ant elder
The ejb binding is still has a dependency on an openejb snapshot jar. I can't see a 3.0.0 released version of openejb anywhere, am i looking in the wrong place? If not what would be the implications of rolling back the ejb binding to not depend on this snapshot? ...ant

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1569) Minor fixes for implementation.osgi

2007-08-22 Thread Rajini Sivaram (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajini Sivaram updated TUSCANY-1569: Attachment: modules-implementation-osgi-patch.txt itest-osgi-implementatio

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1569) Minor fixes for implementation.osgi

2007-08-22 Thread Rajini Sivaram (JIRA)
Minor fixes for implementation.osgi Key: TUSCANY-1569 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA OSGi Integration

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1564) xsi:type not always set for complexTypes

2007-08-22 Thread Matthew Peters (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthew Peters closed TUSCANY-1564. --- Resolution: Fixed I have tested the fix in the cpp-pre2.1 branch and it is indeed fixed. Th

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1566) Element coming out in the wrong namespace

2007-08-22 Thread Matthew Peters (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthew Peters closed TUSCANY-1566. --- I have tested the fix in the cpp-pre2.1 branch and it is indeed fixed. Thanks. > Element comin

Model printing - Causing problems in binding-sca-axis2

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Laws
Changes overnight mean that the tests for the remote version of the sca binding don't run. CompositeActivator.addReferenceBindingProvider(RuntimeComponent, RuntimeComponentReference, Binding) Is now deferred until someone gets the runtime wires from the component reference. Here are the unfortun

Re: SCA distribution is really big now

2007-08-22 Thread ant elder
So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's account for about 50MB: demo-allert-aggregator.war demo-mortgage-creditcheck.war sample-helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp.war sample-helloworld-ws-service-webapp.

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1568) tuscany-sca bundle jar clean up

2007-08-22 Thread ant elder (JIRA)
tuscany-sca bundle jar clean up --- Key: TUSCANY-1568 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1568 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Build System Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next

Re: Spec clarification for conversational/callback semantics: Reply #2

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Nash
Mike Edwards wrote: Simon, Yes, you've hit one of the parts of the Java spec that makes me least comfortable. The idea of sending around a reference for others to use is not something that fills me with joy, when that reference is essentially a reference to an instance. I feel the religi

Re: Difference between o.a.t.sca.scope and o.a.t.sca.core.scope

2007-08-22 Thread ant elder
On 8/22/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Doing either of these things would mean changing the current location of the > spis of course. Are we ready for that kind of change? We're planning on cutting the branch for the release tomorrow so I'm not at all keen for a change like this to h

Unintended SCDL

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Laws
Currently the result of: ... Is an NPE. The same is true for the other extensions we have defined. This is because the code is expecting the appropriate component/service/reference/binding structure to have been read before encountering the extension Putting extensions where the code is

Re: Difference between o.a.t.sca.scope and o.a.t.sca.core.scope

2007-08-22 Thread ant elder
Sounds good to have the SPIs more easily identifiable. One thing is that the "lots of individual modules" structure is aimed at making Tuscany developer's lives easier and the tuscany-sca bundle jar is aimed at making Tuscany user's lives easier. Should we encourage most uses to use the bundle jar

Re: [jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1053) Use a Tuscany namespace for all non-spec'd Tuscany extensions

2007-08-22 Thread Mike Edwards
Jean-Sebastien, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Looks like option (B) is the most preferred option with: - one -1 - five +1 - one "more spec compliant" Do we need more technical discussion? or a new [VOTE] thread to close this issue? Thanks for a great summary. I'm happy with the conclusi

Re: [NOTICE] Brady Johnson voted as Tuscany committer

2007-08-22 Thread Mike Edwards
Brady, A warm welcome... Mike. Pete Robbins wrote: The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Brady to become a Tuscany committer. Congratulations and welcome Brady! I look forward to your continued excellent contributions to Tuscany. Cheers, -

Re: Difference between o.a.t.sca.scope and o.a.t.sca.core.scope

2007-08-22 Thread Simon Laws
On 8/22/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Are there plans to include 'spi' to the names of packages in the spi > module > as part of this effort ? > > Thanks > > - Venkat > > > On 8/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Module core contains an o

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1463) Support for Clob and Array fields

2007-08-22 Thread Adriano Crestani (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani resolved TUSCANY-1463. --- Resolution: Fixed > Support for Clob and Array fields > ---

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1463) Support for Clob and Array fields

2007-08-22 Thread Amita Vadhavkar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521721 ] Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1463: -- I have verified from the latest trunk code that the patch and

Reason changed instantiation of javax.xml.stream.XMLInputFactory

2007-08-22 Thread shaoguang geng
Hello every body, 2 days ago, I inquired why inside class ReallySmallRuntimeBuilder method createContributionService(...), instantiation of javax.xml.stream.XMLInputFactory has been changed form XMLInputFactory xmlFactory = XMLInputFactory.newInstance(); to XMLInputFactory xmlFactory = registry.g