[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-1053.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Check discussion thread for discussion on aprach taken
http://ww
Done under revision #568830
On 8/22/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien,
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
> >
> > Looks like option (B) is the most preferred option with:
> > - one -1
> > - five +1
> > - one "more spec compliant"
> >
> > Do we need more technical discu
Simon Nash wrote:
How about binding-ajax-dwr? This seems to go well with binding-ws-axis2.
That seems to contradict what we said before as:
- DWR is a transport protocol (like JSON, another protocol)
- but Axis2 is an implementation.
Simon
Mike Edwards wrote:
+1 to the rename. Best to
+1 for "I think we should just document how to copy the required JARs to the
Tomcat lib folder and run the stripped down WARs this way, assuming that
it works".
We anyways have the READMEs where we put in documentation on how to run the
samples. Adding this step for webapps seems fine to me
-Ven
Well, i gave it a try, and I was able to get further by creating and
registering a new module activator that extended BindingsActivator and
overriding the getBindingQName method.
On 8/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm updating all Tuscany extensions that are non-spec'd to use
Simon Nash wrote:
Sorry for the delay in replying. I was away with no access to email.
Comments inline.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
See inline.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Sor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1500:
Attachment: patch2
Here is patch2 for this JIRA. It enables the callback-id test in the build and
Hi, interesting topic :) so I've copied the tuscany-user list as well in
case some of our users are interested too.
Vasil Vasilev wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to start a discussion about how we see the usage and the future of
XQuery within the boundaries of SCA.
What inspired me when I start
The calculator and helloworld Web Service WAR samples contain test cases
that attempt to talk to the sample Webapp that they are contained in. I
am not sure how they're supposed to work without taking the WAR and
deploying it to a separate Tomcat instance by hand. Maybe I missed a
step or my en
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'll start a different thread to discuss the more long term support
for .
For now, comments inline to cover the immediate WAR size issue for the
0.99 release.
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
1 - what is in the war that is build from these samples - currently
all of
t
I'll start a different thread to discuss the more long term support for
.
For now, comments inline to cover the immediate WAR size issue for the
0.99 release.
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
1 - what is in the war that is build from these samples - currently all of
the tuscany jars required
[s
helloworld-jsronrpc sample does not run using .99 snapshot
--
Key: TUSCANY-1573
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1573
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Compon
Hi,
I uploaded a patch for TUSCANY-1371. If someone could review and apply
it that would be great.
Thanks,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Michael Yoder (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:47 PM
To: Michael Yoder
Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1371
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521938
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1571:
---
I'll add it to svn and exclude it from the itest/pom.xml as it is no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1571:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
> componentType files not supported for implementation.java
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Yoder updated TUSCANY-1371:
---
Attachment: TUSCANY-1371.txt
This patch updates the DataObject::getProperty methods to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1571:
Attachment: test1571.zip
The test case is a modified version of the calculator sample from which
mvn on helloworld-ws-reference gets exception - used binary snapshot for .99
-
Key: TUSCANY-1572
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1572
Project: Tuscany
componentType files not supported for implementation.java
-
Key: TUSCANY-1571
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1571
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Componen
I'm updating all Tuscany extensions that are non-spec'd to use a
Tuscany namespace, and with this, some bindings or component types
will be registered with the SCA 1.0 namespace (e.g binding-ejb) but
others will use the Tuscany extension namespace (e.g binding-dwr). In
this case, and mainly when t
ANT build of calcualator-webapp sample fails.. either remove it or fix it
-
Key: TUSCANY-1570
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1570
Project: Tuscany
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash reopened TUSCANY-1500:
-
Assignee: Simon Nash (was: Raymond Feng)
Thanks for applying patch1. I'm reopening this JIR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1500.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied. Thanks.
> Many callback tests don't run
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1500:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng (was: Simon Nash)
> Many callback tests don't run
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1569:
-
Assignee: ant elder (was: Raymond Feng)
Assigned it back to Ant as he has already appl
Hi, Sebastien.
You're right on what I meant "used to be". IMO, these are in the grey areas
as we're not very sure if we should extend the scoping support for other
component implementation types.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Running calculator-script using the distribution, I see the following
message. Result is OK, but this seems to be complaining about some package.
I also saw this when I tried to run the same sample from within eclipse :
sys-package-mgr*: can't create package cache dir, 'C:\tuscany-new\s
ca-dist\tus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1500:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
> Many callback tests don't run
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash updated TUSCANY-1500:
Attachment: patch1
Here is patch1 for this JIRA. It enables the callback-api test in the build
I don't think we should go down the path of copying all the runtime
information back into the model. In this specific case, omitting
explicit callback binding information from the model means that the
implementation runtime can make a choice. So there is no inconsistency
with the runtime having
On 8/22/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is
> > currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's
> > account for about 50MB:
> >
> > demo-allert-aggregator.war
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
The o.a.t.sca.scope contains the interfaces/classes which used to be
SPIs while the o.a.t.sca.core.scope contains implementation classes.
Thanks,
Raymond
What you said here quickly started a whole new discussion about SPIs :)
but I'd like to make I understand exact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1569:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng (was: ant elder)
> Minor fixes for implementation.osgi
> -
With the DAS beta1 release out, I'd like to look forward to things
that we want to do next for DAS.
I think that there are still couple things that we can improve our
core DAS features, the main one would be adding support for multiple
DAS implementations, and review our SDO 2.1 APIs usage.
As fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1569.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied, thanks for the code Rajini.
> Minor fixes for implementation.osgi
Hi,
Thank you for catching this. Using the getters to dump objects seems to be
destructive in some cases. I'll add a field introspection based approach to
the PrintUtil.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Wednesday, August 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-1569:
--
Assignee: ant elder
> Minor fixes for implementation.osgi
>
If it comes to (b) then that sounds ok to me, better than not including the
ejb binding in the release anyway.
...ant
On 8/22/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I looked into this dependency last night as I was hoping the release of
> Geronimo 2.0.1 could help us move to a
Hi,
I looked into this dependency last night as I was hoping the release of
Geronimo 2.0.1 could help us move to a stable level of OPENEJB. Here is what
I found out:
a) The Geronimo 2.0.1 release depends on a fixed revision (3.0.0-r562820)
[1] of OPENEJB 3.0.0 stream, but it is not an offici
ant elder wrote:
So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is
currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's
account for about 50MB:
demo-allert-aggregator.war
demo-mortgage-creditcheck.war
sample-helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp.war
sample-helloworld
ant elder wrote:
On 8/22/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doing either of these things would mean changing the current location of the
spis of course. Are we ready for that kind of change?
We're planning on cutting the branch for the release tomorrow so I'm not at
all keen
On 8/22/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is
> currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's
> account for about 50MB:
>
> demo-allert-aggregator.war
> demo-mortgage-creditcheck.war
> sample-h
In Axis2ReferenceBindingProvider constructor there is some code that looks
for the callback associated with the reference, if there is one, to get the
binding. From this it ultimately determines the from address for outgoing
messages.
// look for a matching callback binding
WebServ
Please review the current distributions so we've a good shot and getting an
RC1 on friday that passes. You can build the absolute latest distro's
yourself from sca/distribution or I'm right now uploading pre-built ones to
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/SNAPSHOT/. This isn't complete
and
The ejb binding is still has a dependency on an openejb snapshot jar. I
can't see a 3.0.0 released version of openejb anywhere, am i looking in the
wrong place? If not what would be the implications of rolling back the ejb
binding to not depend on this snapshot?
...ant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajini Sivaram updated TUSCANY-1569:
Attachment: modules-implementation-osgi-patch.txt
itest-osgi-implementatio
Minor fixes for implementation.osgi
Key: TUSCANY-1569
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1569
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA OSGi Integration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthew Peters closed TUSCANY-1564.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I have tested the fix in the cpp-pre2.1 branch and it is indeed fixed. Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthew Peters closed TUSCANY-1566.
---
I have tested the fix in the cpp-pre2.1 branch and it is indeed fixed. Thanks.
> Element comin
Changes overnight mean that the tests for the remote version of the sca
binding don't run.
CompositeActivator.addReferenceBindingProvider(RuntimeComponent,
RuntimeComponentReference, Binding)
Is now deferred until someone gets the runtime wires from the component
reference.
Here are the unfortun
So not much consensus on what to do with this yet. The binary distro is
currently coming in at 107MB. Of that the following 5 samples and demo's
account for about 50MB:
demo-allert-aggregator.war
demo-mortgage-creditcheck.war
sample-helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp.war
sample-helloworld-ws-service-webapp.
tuscany-sca bundle jar clean up
---
Key: TUSCANY-1568
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1568
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build System
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Mike Edwards wrote:
Simon,
Yes, you've hit one of the parts of the Java spec that makes me least
comfortable.
The idea of sending around a reference for others to use is not
something that fills me with joy, when that reference is essentially a
reference to an instance. I feel the religi
On 8/22/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doing either of these things would mean changing the current location of the
> spis of course. Are we ready for that kind of change?
We're planning on cutting the branch for the release tomorrow so I'm not at
all keen for a change like this to h
Currently the result of:
...
Is an NPE. The same is true for the other extensions we have defined. This
is because the code is expecting the appropriate
component/service/reference/binding structure to have been read before
encountering the extension
Putting extensions where the code is
Sounds good to have the SPIs more easily identifiable.
One thing is that the "lots of individual modules" structure is aimed at
making Tuscany developer's lives easier and the tuscany-sca bundle jar is
aimed at making Tuscany user's lives easier. Should we encourage most uses
to use the bundle jar
Jean-Sebastien,
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Looks like option (B) is the most preferred option with:
- one -1
- five +1
- one "more spec compliant"
Do we need more technical discussion? or a new [VOTE] thread to close
this issue?
Thanks for a great summary.
I'm happy with the conclusi
Brady,
A warm welcome...
Mike.
Pete Robbins wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Brady to become a
Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Brady!
I look forward to your continued excellent contributions to Tuscany.
Cheers,
-
On 8/22/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there plans to include 'spi' to the names of packages in the spi
> module
> as part of this effort ?
>
> Thanks
>
> - Venkat
>
>
> On 8/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Module core contains an o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani resolved TUSCANY-1463.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Support for Clob and Array fields
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521721
]
Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1463:
--
I have verified from the latest trunk code that the patch and
Hello every body,
2 days ago, I inquired why inside class
ReallySmallRuntimeBuilder
method createContributionService(...), instantiation of
javax.xml.stream.XMLInputFactory has been changed form
XMLInputFactory xmlFactory = XMLInputFactory.newInstance();
to
XMLInputFactory xmlFactory = registry.g
62 matches
Mail list logo
