sounds good to me.
On 9/6/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to
> support SDO 2.1 specification and to be compatible with SDO 1.0
> release. I'd like to start to work on a new release in the next couple
> days, and if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1629:
-
Assignee: Luciano Resende
> Tuscany does not support using classes in the @Service anno
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1519.
---
Resolution: Fixed
we already print out warnings to report this problem in CompositeBuilderI
+1 on the proposal. I'll give a try to refactor the Message code.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: What is Message.set/getCallableReference used for?
Simon Nash wrote
Simon Nash wrote:
See inline.
Simon
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
There are a set of states associated with
CallableReference/ServiceReference such as the callbackID,
conversationID and callbackObject. We need to flow them in the
Message so that the target service can have the correct correlat
ServiceReference.getConversationID always returns null
--
Key: TUSCANY-1670
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1670
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Ja
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuhwei Lwo updated TUSCANY-1645:
Attachment: 1645.patch
This patch should handle null namespace now. If doesn't have any
content
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1663.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I believe it's fixed under r572846. Please verify.
> Unhelpful exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1517:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
> If serviceImpl is pointing to wrong service in @Service annota
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1662:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
> NullpointerException if reference name in composite file needs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1663:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
> Unhelpful exception when user forgets to put @Remotable on Jav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1662.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed under r573086
> NullpointerException if reference name in composit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1517.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed under r573085
> If serviceImpl is pointing to wrong service in @Se
Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to
support SDO 2.1 specification and to be compatible with SDO 1.0
release. I'd like to start to work on a new release in the next couple
days, and if we make it on time, we could still have a chance to
include DAS in the SCA 1.0 rele
Done under revision #573083
On 9/2/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> companyweb --> company-webapp
> advancedweb --> advanced-webapp
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Regards,
> Amita
>
> On 9/3/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Amita wrote:
> > >We can rename "sample-
ant elder wrote:
On 9/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 8/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This thread has gone quiet but there's been more discussion on this in
TUSCANY-1654 (in case people aren't reading all the jira comments).
How
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/5/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that we have a similar issue that I'm looking at under the
wsdl2java tooling, described in this post [1]
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg22726.html
On 9/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
Hi,
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Issue with dynamic creation of
NotificationReferenceBindingProvider
Raymond Feng wrote:
Comments inline.
Th
Tuscany User request: service lifecycle mechanism upporting both POJO/local
method invocation as well as remote WSI basic interoperable mechanisms.
---
On 9/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 8/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This thread has gone quiet but there's been more discussion on this in
> > TUSCANY-1654 (in case people aren't reading all the jira comments).
> >
> > How about
Tuscany User request for BPEL integration with Tuscany
--
Key: TUSCANY-1668
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1668
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Compon
Support for transaction/compensation
Key: TUSCANY-1667
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1667
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affe
Raymond Feng wrote:
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Issue with dynamic creation of
NotificationReferenceBindingProvider
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote
Security policy- participation in existing security context
---
Key: TUSCANY-1666
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1666
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Done under revision #573040
On 9/3/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Contribution modules have couple of @deprecated artifacts today, such
> as ContributionPostProcessor and ContributionMetadataDocumentProcessor
> interfaces. As preparation for SCA 1.0 release, I'd like to remove
>
ant elder wrote:
On 8/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This thread has gone quiet but there's been more discussion on this in
TUSCANY-1654 (in case people aren't reading all the jira comments).
How about we just have a ServletHost getContextPath() modeled after the
Servlet APIs g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1520.
---
Resolution: Invalid
The stacktrace points to old code which is not in trunk any more. Pleas
I agree that interoperability is important, not just with Axis2 but
also with other Web Service stacks out there.
The best guide to industry standard Web Service interoperability
that I am aware of is the WS-I Basic Profile.
If we send an empty body in the case of a no-argument Java method
(as t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1521.
---
Resolution: Invalid
The stacktrace points to very old code. Please reopen it with the lates
On 9/5/07, Dinesh Shahane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Simon,
>
> Thanks for the pointers. I will modify web services binding locally to try
> out axis2 based SOAP/JMS as suggested.
>
> In particular, I am looking to support JMS features such as client
> acknowledgements, application properties
Simon,
Thanks for the pointers. I will modify web services binding locally to try
out axis2 based SOAP/JMS as suggested.
In particular, I am looking to support JMS features such as client
acknowledgements, application properties, and publications of XML as well as
SOAP messages. I will try it o
In the case I'm investigating, the issue is around checking if the
wrapper style is in use for the wsdl, but the problem is that
wsdl2java generates wrong interfaces for the wsdl in question.
On 9/5/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/5/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 9/5/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Note that we have a similar issue that I'm looking at under the
> wsdl2java tooling, described in this post [1]
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg22726.html
>
> On 9/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTE
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Issue with dynamic creation of
NotificationReferenceBindingProvider
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
At this moment, the
Note that we have a similar issue that I'm looking at under the
wsdl2java tooling, described in this post [1]
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg22726.html
On 9/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
I've done a bit more investigation now. For the signature
String foo()
Axis2 Java2WSDL generates
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
attributeFormDefault="qualified"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
tar
On 9/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 9/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm trying to understand the overall picture before choosing a side:
> >
> >> - tolerate what Axis2 generates in our isWrapped() algorithm?
Rajini,
If this goes into 1.0, can you please update Java user doc[1]?
Thanks,
Haleh
[1]:http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-user-guide.html
On 8/30/07, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Raymond,
>
> The classes annotated in the bundle should be the classes used to
> implemen
On 8/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This thread has gone quiet but there's been more discussion on this in
TUSCANY-1654 (in case people aren't reading all the jira comments).
How about we just have a ServletHost getContextPath() modeled after the
> Servlet APIs getContextPath method?
ant elder wrote:
On 9/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to understand the overall picture before choosing a side:
- tolerate what Axis2 generates in our isWrapped() algorithm?
Is it really just the wsdl that Axis2 (1.2) generates? What about anyone
On 9/5/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to understand the overall picture before choosing a side:
> - tolerate what Axis2 generates in our isWrapped() algorithm?
Is it really just the wsdl that Axis2 (1.2) generates? What about anyone
using an existing wsdl that
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
At this moment, the code works as Ignacio described. We defer the
activation of a reference to the first time it's used for invocation.
If we decide that we need to agressively start the reference bindings,
we can add the part back to CompositeActivatorImpl.
Thanks,
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
I've done a bit more investigation now. For the signature
String foo()
Axis2 Java2WSDL generates
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
attributeFormDefault="qualified" elementFormDefault="qualified"
targetNamespace="http://test/xsd";>
Sure, thats just making the "source and target interfaces use different
databindings caused a databinding transformation" explicit on the message.
So if you want it explicit like that that sounds ok to me as well.
Still seems like the pass-by-value code should be out of the Java
implementation and
At this moment, the code works as Ignacio described. We defer the activation
of a reference to the first time it's used for invocation. If we decide that
we need to agressively start the reference bindings, we can add the part
back to CompositeActivatorImpl.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Mes
We could fix this issue by allowing some headers on the Message. The
DataBinding interceptor can then use one header to pass a flag down so that
the Pass-By-Value invoker can skip the copy.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
FYI...
In running through the following code path with multiple threads I noticed
the following, and opened a JIRA on AXIOM:
Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException: concurrent access to
HashMap attempted by Thread
at java.util.HashMap.onEntry(HashMap.java:213)
at java.util.H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525115
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1659:
-
I get no errors on my pendrivelinux env (a debian derivative)
>
On 9/5/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 to doing the fixup in one place, and rationalizing all the
> places where we generate WSDL. I'd appreciate some pointers to
> where these are as I don't think I've found them all yet :-)
>
>Simon
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
> > On 9/5/07, Sim
But doesn't that mean we're not going to work with wsdl generated by Axis2
tooling (and likely others) and all the existing services using that wsdl
and returning it with ?wsdl.
Its even debatable the wsdl is "wrong" as wrapped style has been used long
before jaxws came along but never precisely d
+1 to doing the fixup in one place, and rationalizing all the
places where we generate WSDL. I'd appreciate some pointers to
where these are as I don't think I've found them all yet :-)
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/5/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have concerns about making t
On 9/5/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ant,
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > I'm looking at what we could do for TUSCANY-1559 which is about
> unnecessary
> > pass-by-value copies causing failures when arguments aren't
> serializable.
> > The problem is on line 260 of JavaComponentContextPr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525099
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1659:
-
could you please attach the report file from the target/sure-fir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525098
]
Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1665:
--
Please see that the original copyright was preserved in the 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1665:
-
Attachment: 1665.patch
please see all details from
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany
On 9/5/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have concerns about making the Tuscany code wrong to compensate for
> the generated WSDL being wrong. This feels like a step in the wrong
> direction, and it won't allow non-Tuscany Web service clients to call
> Tuscany services that use gener
Thank you Raymond. I am checking it out.
JOTM seems working well with JDK5 when used "without" Tomcat.
So, I am trying to create a simple quick non-web sample using JOTM. In this
MoneyTransfer example, user entered amount will be withdrawn from one of his
bankaccount using one call to das.applyCha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1359:
Patch Info: (was: [Patch Available])
patch available flag was set in error
> New SDOUt
Sample to demo DAS with external Transaction Manager
Key: TUSCANY-1665
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1665
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson closed TUSCANY-1540.
---
Resolution: Fixed
tests from patch added to the new toolsTest project
> Abstract Static B
I have concerns about making the Tuscany code wrong to compensate for
the generated WSDL being wrong. This feels like a step in the wrong
direction, and it won't allow non-Tuscany Web service clients to call
Tuscany services that use generated WSDL.
Instead, I'd prefer to have Tuscany postproces
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nishant Joshi updated TUSCANY-1664:
---
Attachment: ExampleService.java
MyException.java
localhost1.
Get error: faultCode=UNBOUND_PREFIX: Unable to determine namespace of
'ax21:MyException'
Key: TUSCANY-1664
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1664
Comments inline.
On 9/4/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
> > Part of the design of binding-notification is that
> > NotificationReferenceBindingProvider
> > serves as a producer service to handle subscription requests from
> consumers.
> > Because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525075
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1638:
-
Could you please say how you re invoking the generator and what
Ant,
ant elder wrote:
I'm looking at what we could do for TUSCANY-1559 which is about unnecessary
pass-by-value copies causing failures when arguments aren't serializable.
The problem is on line 260 of JavaComponentContextProvider where it tries to
determine if the pass-by-value invoker is requi
On 9/5/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/31/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/31/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The operation.getInput() can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525060
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1654:
I'm thinking we'll have to go with adding a getContextPath method to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525058
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1654:
Thats a good point, but the problem with just using the last part of the u
I'm looking at what we could do for TUSCANY-1559 which is about unnecessary
pass-by-value copies causing failures when arguments aren't serializable.
The problem is on line 260 of JavaComponentContextProvider where it tries to
determine if the pass-by-value invoker is required, but it doesn't take
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525053
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on TUSCANY-1654:
--
Even if I decide to use a fixed context path (say "/tu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-1559:
---
Summary: Pass-by-value interceptor not necessary with the Axis2 WS binding
(was: Exception flowin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-1337:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0)
Java-SCA-Next
Difering this as it doesn't
On 9/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/31/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/31/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The operation.getInput() cannot be null to qualify for the wrapper
> > > style.
> > > There must be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-1282:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-1.0)
Java-SCA-Next
> The webapp host uses a st
We've 54 open JIRAs targeted for the SCA 1.0 release and just over one week
left before the first 1.0 RC, and there's 56 JIRAs in SCA-Next which likely
some of them may need to moved to 1.0. It may be time to start focusing on
JIRAs instead of new function if we're to get most of those resolved.
J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525038
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1527:
-
Here are the commits into my sandbox over fresh copies of the SD
I've updated the JIRA for this after debugging through the Geronimo-Tuscany
integration: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1654.
Its an issue with the way the context path is calculated currently in the
Geronimo-Tuscany code. I think there will need to be a fixed context path
used fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1657.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This should be fixed now as of yesterday
> Dynamically generated WSDL using http-t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525030
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1527:
-
I had a play with this and have enabled notifications in our Dat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525027
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1654:
Ok i've got the geronimo-tuscany integration up and running and have been
81 matches
Mail list logo
