With the latest trunk I'm getting the following from
\binding-ws-axis2\src\test\java\org\apache\tuscany\sca\binding\ws\axis2\itests\QuestionMarkWSDLTestCase.java
HTTP ERROR: 500
javax.wsdl.extensions.UnknownExtensibilityElement incompatible with
javax.wsdl.extensions.schema.Schema
Native DAS provides now a new build infrastructure using ant that is also
being used by Native SCA and SDO.
Adriano Crestani
On 7/21/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAS C++ has now its own exceptions, such as DASInvalidTypeNameException,
DASInvalidPropertyNameException,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Naveen updated TUSCANY-1771:
Description: JavaDoc creation is very much necessary. JavaDoc for
integration tests helps to describe
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the latest trunk I'm getting the following from
\binding-ws-axis2\src\test\java\org\apache\tuscany\sca\binding\ws\axis2\itests\QuestionMarkWSDLTestCase.java
HTTP ERROR: 500
javax.wsdl.extensions.UnknownExtensibilityElement
incompatible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar reassigned TUSCANY-1815:
Assignee: Amita Vadhavkar
das.applyChanges will always do insert instead of
On 9/28/07, Dinesh Shahane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw this error when I was trying to build just this module but it went
away when I did a full build.
I do see another error now at runtime (NoClassDefFound) in this module. It
could be due to scope=test
Helloworld-ws-service/pom.xml
WSDL Memory optimization changes cause fault in ?wsdl test case
---
Key: TUSCANY-1821
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1821
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the latest trunk I'm getting the following from
\binding-ws-axis2\src\test\java\org\apache\tuscany\sca\binding\ws\axis2\itests\QuestionMarkWSDLTestCase.java
HTTP ERROR: 500
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531449
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1821:
-
I've reverted a bit of the memory optimization fix (see
Create policy intents to control binding-ws transport as alternative to URI
---
Key: TUSCANY-1822
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1822
Project: Tuscany
The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work
--
Key: TUSCANY-1823
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
The new SOAP/JMS transport option in binding-ws-axis provided by Dinesh
motivated me to go and look at how this new option (soap/jms) might be
selected using the policy framework. This all started a while back with this
thread ( http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg20657.html).
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new SOAP/JMS transport option in binding-ws-axis provided by Dinesh
motivated me to go and look at how this new option (soap/jms) might be
selected using the policy framework. This all started a while back with
this
thread (
On 10/1/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new SOAP/JMS transport option in binding-ws-axis provided by Dinesh
motivated me to go and look at how this new option (soap/jms) might be
selected using the policy framework. This all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1823:
-
Attachment: ComponentContextGetPropertyComparisonFix.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1823:
-
Attachment: ComponentContextGetPropertyTest_FAILS.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531466
]
mcombell edited comment on TUSCANY-1823 at 10/1/07 3:56 AM:
---
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Interesting question here about which piece of configuration wins. I guess
that if you have gone to the trouble to specify the WSDL over and above
the
intent the WSDL should win.
I agree wsdl should win, that would be consistent with the
Folks,
I must admit a preference for keeping Wiki related things on the Wiki.
So, let's say you want an image on a page, then why not have its source
attached to that same page also? Much much easier to keep track of Wiki
stuff that way.
Yours, Mike.
On 10/1/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Interesting question here about which piece of configuration wins. I guess
that if you have gone to the trouble to specify the WSDL over and above
the
intent the WSDL should win.
I
On 10/1/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I must admit a preference for keeping Wiki related things on the Wiki.
So, let's say you want an image on a page, then why not have its source
attached to that same page also? Much much easier to keep track of Wiki
stuff that way.
A long while ago, Tuscany used to use the Store [1] interface in it's
Conversational Scope container to persist data.
However, this is no longer the case as Tuscany-1456 [2] updated the
ConversationalScopeContainer to store the data in a ConcurrentHashMap. (See [3]
for relevant changes)
I would
On 10/1/07, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A long while ago, Tuscany used to use the Store [1] interface in it's
Conversational Scope container to persist data.
However, this is no longer the case as Tuscany-1456 [2] updated the
ConversationalScopeContainer to store the data in a
Add xmlbeans and json databindin itests
---
Key: TUSCANY-1824
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1824
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Integration
On 9/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I looked into the binding-jsonrpc. It seems that the jsonrpc service
binding currently uses the JSONRPCBridge to dispatch the inbound call
to the SCA component. Is there
Folks,
Now that the 1.0 release is out of the way, can I open discussion
(again) about the question of Management for the Tuscany runtime.
1. I think that we should add management interfaces to Tuscany
2. Management should include 2 main things:
- reporting events about things happening
Hi Simon,
I have tried to answer from whatever I know of polices. Hope it helps. :)
Thanks
- Venkat
On 10/1/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new SOAP/JMS transport option in binding-ws-axis provided by Dinesh
motivated me to go and look at how this new option (soap/jms) might
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531539
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-1812:
-
I posted a question on the EMF newsgroup regarding this topic and here
Hi,
I was about to send a note to explain the changes. :-)
It's actually one step to fix the problem reported in TUSCANY-1814. One of
the findings is that WSDL4J agressively load inline schemas and follow the
import/include directives into DOM and Schema extension. As a consequence,
it
SCA Java User Guide: Building The Calculator Sample In Java code snippet
missing @Reference annontation
---
Key: TUSCANY-1825
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1821:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
WSDL Memory optimization changes cause fault in ?wsdl test
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/28/07, Dinesh Shahane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw this error when I was trying to build just this module but it went
away when I did a full build.
I do see another error now at runtime (NoClassDefFound) in this module. It
could be due to scope=test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531566
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1814:
---
The attached XSD has a copyright statement as:
Revision:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531568
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1814:
---
I checked a fix under r580611. Can you verify to see if it helps?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1821.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Checked in the fix under r581016
WSDL Memory optimization changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531572
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-1812:
-
I think the last suggestion sounds like the simplest sollution.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1819.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied under r581024. Thank you, Mark.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1818:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
XMLStreamSerializer - IllegalStateException caused by
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
How about the following reordering:
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software that simplifies the development of
service oriented applications and
Hi Adriano,
I think you should be able to use Sequence::getListIndex to find out
what a list index is, from the setting index.
Michael
Rogue Wave Software, Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Developer -
HydraSDO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Is anybody else seeing this?
[INFO] Compiling 26 source files to
/home/delfinoj/Tuscany/apache-repos/java/sca/itest/osgi-implementation/target/test-classes
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
Hi
It should have been fixed by r580607.
Author: rfeng
Date: Sat Sep 29 10:23:30 2007
New Revision: 580607
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=580607view=rev
Log:
Add the missing test case base class
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/28/07, Dinesh Shahane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw this error when I was trying to build just this module but it
went
away when I did a full build.
I do see another error now at runtime
The dependency is due to programmatic startup of ActiveMQ broker. We need it
for SOAP/JMS and JMS binding tests unless we require the broker to be
started manually from the command line.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that the
mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we wait until it reaches OASIS.
Thats the one i was mainly thinking about.
wait until it reaches
On 10/1/07, Dinesh Shahane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dependency is due to programmatic startup of ActiveMQ broker. We need
it
for SOAP/JMS and JMS binding tests unless we require the broker to be
started manually from the command line.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws
On 10/1/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was about to send a note to explain the changes. :-)
It's actually one step to fix the problem reported in TUSCANY-1814. One of
the findings is that WSDL4J agressively load inline schemas and follow the
import/include directives into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531600
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-1812:
-
Frank,
My solution was far from clean. So, I'll give this solution a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-1825:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
SCA Java User Guide: Building The Calculator Sample In Java code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-1825.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thank you Bruce. Have just been in and fixed that.
Simon
SCA Java User
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531616
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1823:
---
Hi,
I think it requires the SCA spec clarification here. In the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1823:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
The getProperty() method on ComponentContext does not work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531619
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-1812:
-
Frank,
When I invoke ExtendedMetaData.INSTANCE.getName() on all the
+1 This sounds reasonable, and open.
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that the
mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531630
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-1812:
-
Hi Ron,
I think that with Ed's suggestion we don't want to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531632
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-1812:
-
Oops, I just noticed one more thing. You shouldn't be calling
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
My assumption is that the following two are SPIs for Tuscany
embedders. If yes, it looks good to me and we can poish them over time.
* SampleTuscanyDomainImplementation
* SampleTuscanyNodeImplementation
On the API side, I suggest that we have something in addition to
DataTransformationInteceptor should be spelled: DataTransformationInterceptor
---
Key: TUSCANY-1826
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1826
Project: Tuscany
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
$1 Not sure about createDomain. It adds potential confusion. People will
have
to decide when to create and when to get a domain. In out model of
having a central representation of the domain
it works quite
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Why all the static and abstract methods? Is there a reason SCADomain
couldn't just be an interface with a separate SCADomainFactory for
creating
instances?
I don't know. A factory works for
ant elder wrote:
On 9/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Here's sample code to illustrate that use case:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/java/sca/domain-and-node/samples/
SampleTuscanyDomainImplementation.java
Why does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng closed TUSCANY-1826.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed under r581103. Scott, thank you for pointing it out.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531673
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-1812:
-
Hi Frank,
Yes, this works very cleanly. Thanks to you (and Ed) for
63 matches
Mail list logo
