Should autowiring work at the domain level? It doesn't at the moment. It's
only considered within a contributed composite. To autowire at the domain
level we have to adjust the way that service endpoints and references are
matched, i.e. extend the process to looking at interfaces and policies.
In
I'm getting some errors building node-impl on the latest trunk code, anyone
else seeing this or is it something in my local environment?
failure type=junit.framework.AssertionFailedError message=null
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: null
at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
On Nov 27, 2007 9:47 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting some errors building node-impl on the latest trunk code,
anyone
else seeing this or is it something in my local environment?
failure type=junit.framework.AssertionFailedError message=null
Simon,
I had the same two failures with a clean build after checking out the code
yesterday.
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 11/27/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 9:47 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting some errors building node-impl on the
On Nov 27, 2007 10:01 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 9:47 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting some errors building node-impl on the latest trunk code,
anyone
else seeing this or is it something in my local environment?
failure
On Nov 27, 2007 10:46 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 10:01 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 9:47 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting some errors building node-impl on the latest trunk code,
anyone
else seeing this or is
On Nov 27, 2007 11:47 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 11:31 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 11:24 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 10:46 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 10:01
On Nov 27, 2007 2:25 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just committed a runtime-war module as a start of whats being talked
about here, which could be merged or replace distribution/webapp at some
point. I'll post some more details later. One comment inline below:
...ant
On Nov
Hi,
i've a problem with callbacks in this situation.
I create a component, call it.. AComponent
@Remotable
@Callback(AComponentCallback.class)
public interface AComponent {
@OneWay
void someMethod();
}
public interface AComponentCallback
{
void receiveResult()
}
I'd like to set callback
I've just committed a runtime-war module as a start of whats being talked
about here, which could be merged or replace distribution/webapp at some
point. I'll post some more details later. One comment inline below:
...ant
On Nov 23, 2007 6:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
SCADomainFinder's getSCADomain() method always returning null object
Key: TUSCANY-1920
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1920
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1920:
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-1.1
Assignee: Simon Laws
Target 1.1. and assign to me
This should work. I am trying to understand the code example you
gave. In the code snippet you have a call to setCallback() that
passes a ServiceReferenceWorkpoolService as the callback for a
service of type WorkpoolService. However, your sample service is
of type AComponent and its callback
ant elder wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 2:29 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 2:25 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just committed a runtime-war module as a start of whats being
talked
about here, which could be merged or replace distribution/webapp at some
2007/11/27, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This should work. I am trying to understand the code example you
gave. In the code snippet you have a call to setCallback() that
passes a ServiceReferenceWorkpoolService as the callback for a
service of type WorkpoolService. However, your sample
I'm looking at the getQNameDefinition method which is described in the
assembly spec but I don't have a specific scenario describing how it works
or what it's for. It would seem to be saying that parts of the domain model
should be available based on QName but I don't understand why it uses a
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 1:18 AM
Subject: Domain level autowiring etc.
Should autowiring work at the domain level? It doesn't at
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Sebastien,
We would like to enable a binary Tuscany distribution to run under OSGi. I
am not sure of the level of granularity at which a bundle-ized Tuscany makes
sense in terms of providing modularity and versioning using OSGi. But I
would like to make sure that the
Hi,
My understanding is that this operation provides look-up capability in an
installed contribution. For example, if you want to find a WSDL portType
based on the QName in contribution A, the call will be:
QName wsdlPortType = new QName(http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/;,
PortType); // The
Raymond Feng wrote:
[snip]
Should autowiring work at the domain level? It doesn't at the moment.
It's
only considered within a contributed composite. To autowire at the domain
level we have to adjust the way that service endpoints and references are
matched, i.e. extend the process to looking
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 2:51 AM
Subject: Policy Framework Scenarios.
Hi,
Most part of the core policy framework now implemented except
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Meanwhile, I'd like to whet and evolve whatever has been done with different
user perspectives... so here are some perspectives I could think of... could
people kindly help with their opinions and inputs on this, please also
if any of you have other scenarios or ways
Raymond Feng wrote:
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: Venkata Krishnan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 2:51 AM
Subject: Policy Framework Scenarios.
Hi,
Most part of the core policy framework
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
I'll propose a scenario in a separate email.
Here it goes:
- We have support for SCA security policies.
- We have a Bigbank application.
- A bank application should be secure.
Looks like a perfect fit to me.
Going through a real world like scenario and
I think there are two options:
1) Make the JAXB databinding as the default databinding for POJOs (simple
and complex types).
2) Keep the POJO databindings and implement the POJO--XML transformers
using JAXB-impl
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Spring implementation looks for application context files in the wrong location
---
Key: TUSCANY-1921
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1921
Project: Tuscany
Raymond Feng wrote:
I think there are two options:
1) Make the JAXB databinding as the default databinding for POJOs
(simple and complex types).
What about doing that? any drawback?
2) Keep the POJO databindings and implement the POJO--XML transformers
using JAXB-impl
Thanks,
Raymond
I'll prototype to see if it's feasible.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Data transformation from/to POJO
Raymond Feng wrote:
I think there are
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
I think there are two options:
1) Make the JAXB databinding as the default databinding for POJOs
(simple and complex types).
What about doing that? any drawback?
And, jumping ahead and assuming that any drawbacks are acceptable, what
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
2007/11/27, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This should work. I am trying to understand the code example you
gave. In the code snippet you have a call to setCallback() that
passes a ServiceReferenceWorkpoolService as the callback for a
service of type WorkpoolService.
One more question. What is the code in the worker that makes a
callback to the workpool? Does it use an injected reference
annotated with @Callback, or does it make the callback using a
CallableReference for the callback that it obtains from the
RequestContext using the getCallback() method?
The online store tutorial application is now pretty much working.
It shows how SCA allows a business to create an online store composite
application and recompose and evolve it as the business changes and expands.
1. How to build an online store to sell fruits online with an SCA
composite, a
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
I would like to make a start on improving the modularity of the
distro by building a distro containing only a base SCA runtime.
Sebastien's description of this was
- base SCA runtime (assembly, policy fwk, impl-java)
[snip]
I haven't
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
The online store tutorial application is now pretty much working.
[snip]
the tutorial does not yet show how to distribute
the application across different containers like Tomcat or Geronimo. I
think we should add that aspect too, I'll post some ideas on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546092
]
gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1921:
Hi,
I have 2 points to mention, first: implementation-spring has
For this , support for keyref is required from SDO , which will be there in
SDO 3 (as per some old mails). With keyref, FK
relationships in DB can be mapped in model XSDs and there will be no need of
DAS config/COC to provide relationshp info.
Regards,
Amita
On Oct 16, 2007 1:42 PM, Amita
Hi,
I recently read the article on osoa.org:
ãPower_Combination_SCA_Spring_OSGi.pdfã
This article gave great impression to me(and my colleague).
So I think here making Tuscany an osgi based container, will boost Tuscany onto
a new era.
I think from the architect view of Tuscany, it is very
37 matches
Mail list logo
