It's OK,Thanks Raymond.
Thanks,
wangfeng
On 2008-02-20, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I debugged your test case and it turned out the problem is in your test case.
There is a dangling type reference in helloworld.wsdl:
wsdl:types
schema elementFormDefault=qualified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1128:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1468:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1498:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Improve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-257:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
recently added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1006:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1399:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Generate SDO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1283:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Better
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1063:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Improve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1397:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1514:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1531:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Java SDO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1540:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Abstract
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1484:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1673:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1655:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Generated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1272:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1780:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[JAVA-SDO]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1726:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
List
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1084:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1079:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Possible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1505:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Naming scheme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1811:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1788:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1528:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1812:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1830:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
SimpleType
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-2019.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Attached scripts run, thanks Sebb.
If there's others people find please either
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1838:
-
Component/s: Java SDO Implementation
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-2007:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
SDO Samples -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-2009:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Java SDO's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1545:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Change
Sebastien,
Comments inline.
On 2/19/08, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Sebastien,
Contribution classloader was introduced to force isolation of
contributions.
Prior to this, all classes were loaded using a single CLASSPATH-based
classloader,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1359:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
New SDOUtil:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-829:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Investigate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1360:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
New SDOUtil:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-2011:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
include
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1574:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1645:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1832:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
Complex type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1638:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
SDO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-1842:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
IOException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-2025:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-Next)
Java-SDO-1.1
SDO Java
See inline.
Simon
wang feng wrote:
It's OK,Thanks Raymond.
Thanks,
wangfeng
On 2008-02-20, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I debugged your test case and it turned out the problem is in your test
case. There is a dangling type reference in helloworld.wsdl:
Hello,
the
http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANYWIKI/sca-native-next-release-contents.html
page shows that the M4 release was supposed to come out some time in
late 2007.
Does anyone know what the current status is?
Thank you in advance,
Maurice
Notice: This email message, together with any
There has been a few occasions in the SDO spec meetings where issues
associated with raising exceptions have been resolved in favour of not
requiring the implementer to incur the performance overhead of exception
translation or decoration. There are no exceptions defined by the SDO API,
and only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1079:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-1.1)
Java-SDO-CTS-Next
Possible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-829:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-1.1)
Java-SDO-CTS-Next
Investigate
oops, I see you have removed them from the notes, sorry, however, it's
better that they are now tidied up in JIRA too ;-)
On 20/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: amita
Date: Wed Feb 20 01:49:40 2008
New Revision: 629397
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1272:
Component/s: (was: Java DAS RDB)
Java SDO Implementation
Was
Hi,
MessageProcessor is working fine for me... but i want to know that how we
can handle the response tag for it, as I am removing it from method
insertPayloadIntoJMSMessage...
so here in response tag of method extractPayloadFromJMSMessage...
String xml = response xmlns=\
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Kurz updated TUSCANY-1679:
Summary: PBVInvoker doesn't handle checked/business excs (was: PBVInvoker
always uses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12570742#action_12570742
]
Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-1679:
-
The implications of some other discussions
It's a coincidence that the user references xsd:Name (which happens to
exist!) by mistake. But the user meant to reference tns:Name which is a
user-defined complex type defined in the WSDL.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Yes I can envision some useful transforms which wrapper/unwrapper data
formats without doing copies.
That raises the question of how to turn off PBVInterceptor dynamically.
I guess I hadn't given this enough thought before, since actually I'd
like to be able to do the same from the binding
I can see the advantages of registering in init.
I'd heard that import.sdo for statics was deprecated but hadn't
picked up we were trying to say it was deprecated for dynamic too.
I must have missed that...
Scott
-
To
I think there are still issues to be flushed out for the dynamic SDO
support.
Let's first look at the proposal:
1) Create a Composite-scoped java component, and in the method with @Init
to call SDO APIs to register the WSDL/XSD with SDO HelperContext.
(This is doable even though it requires
I coded it to return true for now as all of the existing transformers will
copy data as a result of the data transformation. If we want to have finer
control, we can add a flag method to the transformer to indicate if it
allows pass by reference.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
Scott Kurz wrote:
Wang,
I'm guessing the problem is probably that you need to register your
app types with the appropriate context established by the Tuscany
runtime.
Tuscany typically does this automatically, now, for static SDO. For
dynamic SDO (i.e. DataObject), you would currently put
OK, I guess I didn't understand what you did after all.
I'm not sure why we are looking at the client side and the reference
binding invoker?Is there even
a chain we care about on the client side? Doesn't the chain consist
of a path from client-binding?
I thought it would ONLY be the
Responses inline...thanks
OK, I guess I didn't understand what you did after all.
I'm not sure why we are looking at the client side and the reference
binding invoker?Is there even
a chain we care about on the client side? Doesn't the chain consist
of a path from
I meant to say:
Given my view I don't see it's relevance ON THE CLIENT SIDE
On Feb 20, 2008 2:32 PM, Scott Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Responses inline...thanks
OK, I guess I didn't understand what you did after all.
I'm not sure why we are looking at the client side and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12570819#action_12570819
]
Hasan Muhammad commented on TUSCANY-2052:
-
Example composite declaration:
A Composite without a targetNamespace is not properly started in a contribution
---
Key: TUSCANY-2052
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2052
Project: Tuscany
Following up on resolution of an issue that was brought up a while
ago, and it's very important for the Tuscany community. We have a
Chinese community interested in Tuscany and they have translated our
website for their native language, but unfortunately we are not able
to use it due to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12570823#action_12570823
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2052:
---
By the XML syntax, your composite name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12570830#action_12570830
]
Luciano Resende commented on TUSCANY-2052:
--
Is a composite without namespace a
Luciano Resende wrote:
[snip]
I'll start by copying the current binding-feed
module
[snip]
I made a few minor changes to binding-feed today as I'm trying to use it
to provide ATOMPub access to the contribution workspace that I'm working on.
The changes are in SVN r629625, r629626, r629651,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12570894#action_12570894
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2051:
The suggested fix has already been implemented
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=53360projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 20 Feb 2008 16:28:34 -0800
Finished at: Wed 20 Feb 2008 17:52:27 -0800
Total time: 1h 23m 52s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=53360projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 20 Feb 2008 16:28:34 -0800
Finished at: Wed 20 Feb 2008 17:52:27 -0800
Total time: 1h 23m 52s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Hi,
I'm seeing random failures in itest-callback-multiple-wires. In this itest,
MyServiceComponent is scoped with COMPOSITE. MyClientComponent1 and
MyClientComponent2 invokes MyServiceComponent concurrently. Since the
MyServiceComponent is the same instance for both clients, the
Hi,
I checked in a fix under r629688 by adding a synchronized for the business
method. Please confirm if it's meant to test that way.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 7:52 PM
Hi Maurice,
Thanks for your interest on Native SCA, but unfortunately I have to tell you
the M4 release was never released.
I was helping on a native release that gathered the 3 native projects (SCA,
SDO and DAS), but it was never released. At first, because I got to busy
with my college stuffs
Do we know what is still outstanding for the Native M4 release ?
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Adriano Crestani
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Maurice,
Thanks for your interest on Native SCA, but unfortunately I have to tell you
the M4 release was never released.
I was helping on a
DAS and SDO are ready for the release, but the SCA I can't tell. I still
couldn't get it working and the ones that could help with that just vanished
: ( .
Maybe I will try to get it working on next month and make a release, but
with the native community being inactive, it will get a bit
76 matches
Mail list logo
