[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2010:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Simon Nash)
> Default binding URI for service from Composite im
Hi,
I'm adding the following SPIs to provide pluggable implementations to
various policies in Tuscany. See [1].
1) Define a PolicyProviderFactory that can be contributed to the
ProviderFactoryExtensionPoint by policy extensions. This is similar to our
BindingProviderFactory and Implementatio
Hi Greg,
Yes, it seems that when the PolicySet name is a NCName it does not assume
the targetNamespace as its namespace. I shall fix this rightaway.
But then, I suppose its ok for a PolicySet name to be a QName when it is
desired to have the PolicySet take a namespace other than the
targetNamesp
Hi,
Right but this brings in a circular dependency isn't it ?
Thanks.
- Venkat
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It should be fairly simple to make StAXArtifactProcessorExtensionPoint
> available to CompositeBuilderImpl. With that, we can find t
Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
Simon
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57
Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
Simon
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I apologize in
Simon Laws wrote:
I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating the
new code in assembly which calculates service endpoints i.e. point4 above.
I think we need to amend point 4 to make this work properly..
4. Point my Web browser to the various ATOM collections to get:
-
Hi, Zal.
Thank you for contributing documents to Tuscany. It's really great to see you
share ideas/practices in the community. Here are a few things that I suggest:
1) Start to contribute your content to our wiki site. I have created a blank
page as the starting point at
http://cwiki.apache.o
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ant elder
ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Ok thanks. The element is also extensible so this axis2
config
could be added as extra attributes or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1910.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied under r634464. Thanks for the contribution.
> XStream Data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-2066:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Thanks for the patch! I just marked it as '
Ok. Please be aware there is an errata associated with the authorization
elements.
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/POLICY-26
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> +1. I will start looking into this after I am done with some
> half-finished
> things on m
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> > > On Mon, Ma
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Improving the XQuery component implementation type could be a good
> candidate.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> --
> From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, Febru
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> > A) Contribution workspace (containing installed contributions):
> > - Contribution model representing a contribution
> > - Reader for the contribution model
> > - Workspace
Improving the XQuery component implementation type could be a good
candidate.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 5:52 PM
To: "tuscany-dev"
Subject: Tuscany participation at Google Summer
One possibility in the SDO domain that I have heard a request for recently
from more than one source is an ECMAScript/JavaScript implementation of
SDO. This could be started by a GSoC activity. I opened a Wish List item
for it a few days ago as TUSCANY-2065. I don't have deep skills in this
area,
Venkat,
I was trying some stuff with policy sets and noticed the QName resolution
wasn't working as I expected. Specifically the targetNameSpace attribute of
the definitions.xml document doesn't appear to be used to form the QName of
the policy sets within. I recalled we had discussed this in th
On 05/03/2008, Scott Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I didn't follow all of the discussion about removing SDO from the Tuscany
> charter... but if SDO is no
> longer a special part of the Tuscany project then what would happen to the
> W2J/J2W tools built around
> SDO support?
The WSDL/WSDL
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> TUSCANY-2055 has raised an issue where we need some spec clarity. Namely,
> in relation to the function ServiceReference.getConversationID(), the Java
> Annotations and API V1 spec says a few things.
>
> 521 1.6.6.2. Accessing
Hi,
It should be fairly simple to make StAXArtifactProcessorExtensionPoint
available to CompositeBuilderImpl. With that, we can find the corresponding
StAXArtifactProcessor for a given PolicySetAttachPoint. For example, if you
try to match a component service with an XPath, you can do:
StAXA
Hi, simon
Axis2's JAVA2WSDL can handle the JAX-WS annnotations by default.
Since it's org.apache.axis2.description.java2wsdl.DefaultSchemaGeneratorcontains
following lines:
JAnnotation annotation = jclass.getAnnotation(
AnnotationConstants.WEB_SERVICE);
if (annotation != null) {
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ant elder wrote:
> > > Ok thanks. The element is also extensible so this axis2
> > config
> > > could be added as extra attributes
TUSCANY-2055 has raised an issue where we need some spec clarity. Namely, in
relation to the function ServiceReference.getConversationID(), the Java
Annotations and API V1 spec says a few things.
521 1.6.6.2. Accessing Conversation IDs from Clients
522 Whether the conversation ID is chosen by the
Hi all,
I'm facing build error of Tuscany plugin for Geronimo.
I checked out sources from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/plugins/tuscany/trunk
Specifically, while building "tuscany-tomcat" module.
--
Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/xsd/xsd/2.2.3/xsd-2.2.3.
Hi Raymond,
I did start with the write option but ended up with trouble trying to access
the write methods from the Builders where the PolicySets get matched. I
brought this up for discussion in
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27768.html where
Sebastien suggested that w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wangfeng updated TUSCANY-2066:
--
Attachment: voidtest.zip
This is the modified test case.
> Modify the sample 'ws-void-args-return',r
Modify the sample 'ws-void-args-return',return a null javabean result,throw a
NullPointerException
--
Key: TUSCANY-2066
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSC
Hi Sandeep
Are you able to provide the test case which is giving the error? If so the
best thing to do is open a JIRA and attach it there so someone can run it
and track down the problem.
Just taking a wild stab in the dark it would appear that the runtime is not
able to find the appropriate "sta
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:22 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main thing I'd like to do for 1.2 is to try to finish off the JMS
> binding so that it as much as possible fully implements the spec but that
> wont be done by middle of next week. Guess i don't mind too much just
> committ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-1937:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
> Duplicate binding name not flagged as error
> --
Hi,
I have an component service (wsdl) created with the operation name
"start". Once i run the tuscany runtime , i get an error saying
org.osoa.sca.ServiceRuntimeException: No matching operation for start is
found in service TwoWSService#Compose
what may be the possible reason for this error.
33 matches
Mail list logo
