[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2320) The contextPath init parameter for TuscanyServletFilter.

2008-05-16 Thread ant elder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-2320: --- Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-1.2.1 > The contextPath init parameter for TuscanyServletFilter. >

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2320) The contextPath init parameter for TuscanyServletFilter.

2008-05-16 Thread ant elder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597712#action_12597712 ] ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2320: Sure okhow about a patch to fix it too :-)

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2304) SCA client Hang Forver after getting handled exception from service

2008-05-16 Thread ant elder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder updated TUSCANY-2304: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-Next) Java-SCA-1.2.1 > SCA client Hang Forver

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-2295) Tuscany should allow plugins to load their schemas instead of tuscany schema

2008-05-16 Thread Luciano Resende (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-2295. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed by using DefaultValidationSchemaExtensionPoint that will allo

RE: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4

2008-05-16 Thread Haleh Mahbod
Ant mentioned rampart is not ready yet. Doesen't that require us to wait? -Original Message- From: Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:14 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4 Hi, I'm starting to look into

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2325) Schema validation does not register the exception with the Problem, yet Problem looks for it and finds it to be not-null

2008-05-16 Thread Hasan Muhammad (JIRA)
Schema validation does not register the exception with the Problem, yet Problem looks for it and finds it to be not-null Key: TUSCANY-2325 URL

Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2109) Conflicts between component reference interface and promoted composite reference interface are not detected

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Nash
Scott Kurz wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Scott Kurz wrote: Why do we need to be so strict in comparing interfaces? Can't we argue essentially the same point in the case with we have a Java client w/ reference w/ Java intf with a ? So, followin

Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2109) Conflicts between component reference interface and promoted composite reference interface are not detected

2008-05-16 Thread Scott Kurz
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott Kurz wrote: > >> Why do we need to be so strict in comparing interfaces? >> >> Can't we argue essentially the same point in the case with we have a Java >> client w/ reference w/ Java intf with a ? >> >> So, following t

Re: Tuscany support for Axis 1.4

2008-05-16 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, I'm starting to look into the performance improvements in the JAXB/AXIOM data transformation. It seems that the Axis2 1.4 has done a lot of good work there. If possible, I would like to leverage the latest AXIOM and Axis2 code base ASAP. The dependency might be only AXIOM but mixing the ve

Re: Tomcat deploy of samples fails

2008-05-16 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Which version of Tuscany are you trying? It seems that something went wrong in the bootstrap (we need to dig out the root cause of the exception). Can you also try on Tomcat 6.x? Thanks, Raymond -- From: "Magnus Stoveland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2277) Standardization of registering msg with monitor

2008-05-16 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277: - Attachment: TUSCANY-2277-Part3-New.patch > Standardization of registering msg w

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2277) Standardization of registering msg with monitor

2008-05-16 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277: - Attachment: TUSCANY-2277-Part1-New.patch > Standardization of registering msg w

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2277) Standardization of registering msg with monitor

2008-05-16 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277: - Attachment: TUSCANY-2277-Part2-New.patch > Standardization of registering msg w

Re: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-05-16 Thread Raymond Feng
Please see my comments below. Thanks, Raymond -- From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 1:26 AM To: Subject: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re:

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2277) Standardization of registering msg with monitor

2008-05-16 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277: - Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-2277-Part1-New.patch) > Standardization of regist

Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2109) Conflicts between component reference interface and promoted composite reference interface are not detected

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Nash
Scott Kurz wrote: Why do we need to be so strict in comparing interfaces? Can't we argue essentially the same point in the case with we have a Java client w/ reference w/ Java intf with a ? So, following this logic, it's suggested that the NS calculated per-JAXWS for the Java intf must match th

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2277) Standardization of registering msg with monitor

2008-05-16 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277: - Attachment: TUSCANY-2277-Part1-New.patch > Standardization of registering msg w

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2277) Standardization of registering msg with monitor

2008-05-16 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277: - Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-2277-Part1-New.rtf) > Standardization of register

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2277) Standardization of registering msg with monitor

2008-05-16 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2277: - Attachment: TUSCANY-2277-Part1-New.rtf > Standardization of registering msg wit

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2277) Standardization of registering msg with monitor

2008-05-16 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597544#action_12597544 ] Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2277: -- Hi Simon, The issue seems to

Re: SCA 1.2.1 release

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Nash
Mike Edwards wrote: For my 1 cent on this point. The BPEL code is still raw at this stage and I feel it could do with a few more tweaks before it is really ready for prime time - I certainly still have a lot of trouble getting it to work - and I'm working on it!! I'm not familiar with the B

Re: More Java security fixes on the way

2008-05-16 Thread Dan Becker
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: I'd like to suggest the following: - Keep the Java2 security blocks in test case classes - Don't put them in sample program classes Hmmm but looking at these test cases, could you help me understand why we need these technical API calls to the jmsBroker at all? I

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2290) Java 2 Security enablement for Tuscany sample (part 1)

2008-05-16 Thread Dan Becker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Becker updated TUSCANY-2290: Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-2290.patch) > Java 2 Security enablement for Tuscany sample (part 1

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-2290) Java 2 Security enablement for Tuscany sample (part 1)

2008-05-16 Thread Dan Becker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dan Becker updated TUSCANY-2290: Attachment: TUSCANY-2290.1.patch New patch generated based on comments in Tuscany dev group. Summ

Re: Webapp-based Tuscany/Geronimo integration in Tuscany SCA Java 1.2 release

2008-05-16 Thread ant elder
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there interest in tighter integration between Tuscany/Geronimo? Would > there be interest in generating a Tuscany Plugin for Geronimo? Running > Tuscany as a service? > > --kevan > Yes! I think that would be really u

Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2109) Conflicts between component reference interface and promoted composite reference interface are not detected

2008-05-16 Thread Scott Kurz
Why do we need to be so strict in comparing interfaces? Can't we argue essentially the same point in the case with we have a Java client w/ reference w/ Java intf with a ? So, following this logic, it's suggested that the NS calculated per-JAXWS for the Java intf must match the portType on the WS

Re: Webapp-based Tuscany/Geronimo integration in Tuscany SCA Java 1.2 release

2008-05-16 Thread Kevan Miller
Hi Raymond, One minor netiquette comment... Looks like you used a "Reply To" button when generating your note (then changed the subject line). Some mail readers will still group your email in the previous email thread (one example is Mac OS X Mail). This can cause emails to be lost/cause c

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2283) Conversation should end due to non-business exception

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2283: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Conversation should end due to non-business exception >

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-2092) ConcurrentModificationException in ExtensibleContributionListener

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-2092. --- Resolution: Fixed Thanks for the patch Ram. Committed at 657093 > ConcurrentModificationException

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2092) ConcurrentModificationException in ExtensibleContributionListener

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2092: --- Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Ramkumar Ramalingam) > ConcurrentModificationException in Exten

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2247) vtest content for Java API spec - Conversation/Async

2008-05-16 Thread Kevin Williams (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597491#action_12597491 ] Kevin Williams commented on TUSCANY-2247: - Leaving this open until resolution of

Re: SCA 1.2.1 release

2008-05-16 Thread Mike Edwards
For my 1 cent on this point. The BPEL code is still raw at this stage and I feel it could do with a few more tweaks before it is really ready for prime time - I certainly still have a lot of trouble getting it to work - and I'm working on it!! Yours, Mike. Luciano Resende wrote: In the pa

Re: Conversational semantics using xml in SCDLs

2008-05-16 Thread Mike Edwards
Simon Nash wrote: I am surprised to hear that. I would expect a different interface object to be created for each different interface element appearing in the SCDL. Hmm, my experience recently with the BPEL code shows that the handling of interfaces within Tuscany is not so clean. I'll con

Tomcat deploy of samples fails

2008-05-16 Thread Magnus Stoveland
I've successfully compiled the sample helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp into sample-helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp.war. But when I try to deply the .war to Tomcat 5.5.26, I get the following error: FAIL - Application at context path /sample-helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp could not be started. From the log: - Exce

Re: Small OSGi sample for the main build?

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Nash
Graham Charters wrote: Below are a couple of runs, one taking 2 mins 50s and the second taking 1 min 8s. Both were done after mvn cleans so the difference is maybe due to my machine being under spec and paging. [INFO] [INF

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2277) Standardization of registering msg with monitor

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597473#action_12597473 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-2277: - Hi Ram Was just trying to apply these patches

Re: Small OSGi sample for the main build?

2008-05-16 Thread Graham Charters
Below are a couple of runs, one taking 2 mins 50s and the second taking 1 min 8s. Both were done after mvn cleans so the difference is maybe due to my machine being under spec and paging. [INFO] [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2277) Standardization of registering msg with monitor

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2277: --- Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Ramkumar Ramalingam) > Standardization of registering msg with

Re: Small OSGi sample for the main build?

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Laws
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Graham Charters < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Regarding Mike's build breaking comment, one of the reasons for >> including this in the main build is to have it break to fla

Re: Small OSGi sample for the main build?

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Laws
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding Mike's build breaking comment, one of the reasons for > including this in the main build is to have it break to flag when new > dependencies are being introduced. This will help us focus on > improvin

Re: Small OSGi sample for the main build?

2008-05-16 Thread Graham Charters
Hi, Regarding Mike's build breaking comment, one of the reasons for including this in the main build is to have it break to flag when new dependencies are being introduced. This will help us focus on improving Tuscany modularity, but also help us preserve the support for running in OSGi. It will

RE: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-05-16 Thread Mark Combellack
This problem has now been fixed in SVN revision r657009 Thanks, Mark > -Original Message- > From: Mark Combellack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 May 2008 11:26 > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distribu

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1534) Refactor wireable binding support to make it applicable to all bindings

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Laws (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-1534. --- Resolution: Fixed Done as part of the latest round of reference/binding/endpoint changes. > Refac

RE: Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated bin

2008-05-16 Thread Mark Combellack
Hi, I've just tried building the latest trunk of Tuscany and I'm getting a compile failure in the new endpoint module. The error I am getting is: [INFO] [INFO] Error for project: Apache Tuscany SCA Default Endpoint Im

Re: Running Tuscany/SCA in Google Android mobile platform

2008-05-16 Thread Adriano Crestani
Hi Oscar, My mistake again, the eclipse project files of contribution-impl module were not uploaded, so you are probably using the modules you have downloaded from the sca modules. If you remove the tuscany-contribution-impl from your workspace and add this module from the sandbox it will probably

Re: OSGi-enable 3rd party libraries in Tuscany

2008-05-16 Thread Rajini Sivaram
On 5/16/08, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > >> Simon Nash wrote: >> ... snip >> >> I believe that if we are serious about making OSGi-enablement of Tuscany > a > first class option, we should consider doing 1). For the longer term to > support

Endpoints was: Re: [BRAINSTORM] Flexibility in distributed operation and extension implementations - was: Re: Request to propogate the value of a references target= attribute on its associated binding

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Laws
...snip > > The two sets of SPIs could co-exist for a while with BindingProviders > working with bindings and ServiceProviders (I just made up that name) with > service endpoints. > -- > Jean-Sebastien At r656959 I've just enabled some changes to take a step toward using an Endpoint representati

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2324) InterfaceContract is not pushed down to an inner, promoted component reference only with Axis2 binding

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12597382#action_12597382 ] Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2324: - Disclaimer: I haven't yet looked at the code.

Re: OSGi-enable 3rd party libraries in Tuscany

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Nash
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Simon Nash wrote: ... snip I believe that if we are serious about making OSGi-enablement of Tuscany a first class option, we should consider doing 1). For the longer term to support versioning of 3rd party jars, 1) will provide a standard OSGi mechanism. As more a

Re: Got expection where the wsdl defines an operation without input parameter

2008-05-16 Thread ant elder
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Gilbert Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got following exception in running where the wsdl defines an > operation without input parameter. > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Pass-by-value is not supported for > the given object >at > org.apache.tus