[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-775?page=comments#action_12439456
]
Kenneth Tam commented on TUSCANY-775:
-
Thanks Andy -- I'll verify..
> Web deployment broken
> -
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-775?page=all ]
Kenneth Tam reassigned TUSCANY-775:
---
Assignee: Kenneth Tam
> Web deployment broken
> -
>
> Key: TUSCANY-775
>
It appears that a C++ version of XMLBeans is much closer to being
reality at Apache -- see the post below forwarded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuscany C++ folks, has there been consideration of leveraging an XML
mapping technology like this? I know the support for multiple
databinding frameworks ten
-0 on ordaining some kind of "official" priority for functional
equivalency with M1 -- my opinion is that at this stage in the project
(ie, incubation), developer community is significantly more important
than user community. I'd rather we take a more free form stance with
respect to encouraging
Jeremy, can you elaborate a bit on
SystemCompositeComponent.registerJavaObject()? The call to register
the RuntimeInfo in Launcher is the only non-test call I can find, and
the doc suggests that it's sort of a shorthand for what the builder
code might do.
While I'm asking about the Launcher: Can
Quick question -- have you looked at using e.g. the commons-codec
URLCodec.encode() ? I think it should solve this problem as well.
On 7/14/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
URL returned from Class.getResource() sometimes does not strictly conform to
RFC2396. As a result, runn
+1
On 7/14/06, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello fellow committers,
Last week I was on vacation and felt for sure that when I got back
I'd see a unified direction for the Java Tuscany SCA code base. I've
held back discussing any of this for a while because I didn't want
t
I can help with this; I'll be in Paris around that time, so
travel-wise it will be very doable. Anyone else interested?
On 7/13/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes - BeJUG is one of the biggest and most active user groups in
Europe (Google JavaPolis).
It's probably easier if someo
On 7/6/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006, at 12:05 PM, Simon Nash wrote:
All ideas that Sebastien has proposed are being considered - we had a
long discussion on these very things on IRC this morning. The main
questions being asked about his proposal are "what is the be
On 7/6/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>>
>> We will also hold pre-announced chats at other times so try and
>> bring closure to issues that seem to be dragging on in email
>> threa
On 7/5/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 12:43 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
> My proposal is not to merge M1 and the core2 sandbox. I am
> proposing to start a new fresh code stream and build the runtime
> through baby steps. We may be able to reuse some piece
Thanks Jeremy -- "works on my machine".
Raymond, I've submitted a bunch of Spring changes, including your
patch to upgrade to Spring 2.0-rc1.
On 6/27/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/26/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've disabled the checkstyle stuff for now
The sandbox build is broken right now (looks like issues around
switching to a sandbox version of the spec project).
Rather than risk adding to the confusion with another couple of
checkins that I can't validate, I'm going to hold off until this gets
fixed.
thanks,
k
On 6/26/06, K
n.
>>
>> Thank you for pointing it out. Maybe it won't accept files with
>> extension
>> "patch"?
>>
>> Anyway, here's the patch again.
>>
>> Raymond
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Kenneth Tam"
&g
Hello ,
Kenneth Tam has invited you to join a meeting on the Web, using WebEx
Topic: Apache Tuscany Architecture Overview
Date: Friday, June 9, 2006
Time: 7:30 am, Pacific Daylight Time (GMT -07:00, San Francisco)
Meeting number: 924 170 615
Meeting password: tuscany
Please click the
I am very interested in this, but the short notice also concerns me.
Can we push this out to at least the end of the week (say Friday?) or
sometime next week so that more people on the list get a chance to
find out about it and fit it into their schedules?
Also, Jim & Jeremy -- if you guys have a
+1 for this, but I don't think the two layouts are actually in conflict.
I completely agree SDO and SCA should build/test/package/potentially
ship separately, and the directory structure should support that. I
think:
cpp/sca/
cpp/sdo/
java/sca/
java/sdo/
is the right place to start. As far as
17 matches
Mail list logo
