he timeframe and
> > considering we would still work on issues on the week of Jan 7th, I'd
> > recommend continue on trunk until sometime around end of year.
> >
> > On Dec 12, 2007 12:22 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't think the
On Dec 13, 2007 8:26 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Two reasons
> why bindings need to be identified and have endpoint information updated.
>
> 1. The endpoint information is not known in the domain unless it is
> explicitly provided by the user. If it isn't provided by the user the
>
> a
> java interface, we by default treat it as unwrapped.
>
> Maybe you can give us more information about the scenario and we can talk
> about more options from there.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "ant elder" <[EM
Though this gives unwrapped xml, is there something to set somewhere so it
gives wrapped style xml?
...ant
On Dec 12, 2007 5:27 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks!
>
>...ant
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2007 5:11 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks!
...ant
On Dec 12, 2007 5:11 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please use XMLStringDataBinding.NAME instead. The current name is
> "java.lang.String" but we may change it.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -
> Fr
r the transformation:"
exception. Do we have a databinding for this?
...ant
On Dec 12, 2007 3:23 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm probably not going to provide enough information to get much of an
> answer but I'll ask now anyway in case anyone has an obvious a
I'm probably not going to provide enough information to get much of an
answer but I'll ask now anyway in case anyone has an obvious answer right
away...
Is there a simple way for a binding to say what data binding it wants used?
I know there's Interface.resetDataBinding but to use that you need t
I don't think the tomcat deep integration, JMS, or distribution structure
changes would all be done by next week. Haven't seen much happening with
jsonrpc references recently either. We do have all of the rest of this year
to continue development though right?
...ant
On Dec 11, 2007 10:59 PM,
run inside websphere as a webapp - which I've got running
> for some of the examples.
>
> The JMS Queues would be provided by websphere also, so they would exist
> and be pre-configured before the service was deployed.
>
> Stevan.
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2007 12:37 PM, an
ng if there are any
> examples about using a reference with both a request and response queue?
>
> Is the Text/XML payload going to be in the next release? Or does that
> just depend on how much can be achieved before the release?
>
> Stevan.
>
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 11:29 AM,
On Dec 9, 2007 1:45 PM, Stevan Camp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to Tuscany and wondered if anyoen out there was able to offer me
> some help.
>
> I have a non-SCA service which operates with two JMS queues, one being
> request and one being response. They follow the usual patt
On Dec 9, 0007 2:32 AM, Continuum VMBuild Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Online report :
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=26957&projectId=36
>
> Build statistics:
> State: Error
> Previous State: Ok
> Started at: Sat 8 Dec 2007 17:33:10 -0800
> Finished at:
On Dec 7, 2007 5:22 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From the IP perspective, do you see any issues to host 3rd party jars in our
> svn if the licenses are compatible with Apache and the owners are OK for
> the
> hosting?
>
I know there's a separate module now but just to answer tha
(forwarded to dev list from user list to discuss this esb aspect)
I'm interested in this ESB aspect and wonder wouldn't it be good to have
some sort of ESB like thing as part of Tuscany. You can use SCA in an ESB,
Tuscany with all its bindings and implementation types has a lot of similar
functio
ant to take the responsiblity. Can
> we
> > publish the jars (which are not in a public maven repo yet) in our svn
> > repo as a maven repo as Geronimo is doing? See
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/2.0.2/repository/.
> >
> > Thanks,
> &g
We've now a dependency on Saxon 9.0.0.2 but thats not in any Maven
repository we use so the build fails. Must we use Saxon 9.0.0.2 or does
anyone know of a public repository we could get it from?
...ant
Bringing this up again just to remind people to keep thinking about it.
If we can get Tuscany integrated with other projects then the community
around those other projects is opened up to joining the Tuscany community.
People using that other project get exposure to Tuscany and might ask for
help
On Nov 30, 2007 3:32 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know what your contribution looks like but I'm going to try getting
> your web app code running in the store sample so I can move the sample
> distributed scenario on a bit and help you out. Any pointers to where I
> should s
On Nov 30, 2007 9:06 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > ant elder wrote:
> >> On Nov 30, 2007 5:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ant eld
On Nov 30, 2007 5:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 2007 1:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> We have discussed this behaviour before and I was sort of convinced
> last
> >>
On Nov 30, 2007 4:44 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 4:38 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 30, 2007 2:46 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007 2:09 PM, ant elder
On Nov 30, 2007 2:46 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 2:09 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 30, 2007 1:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > We have discussed this behaviour before and
On Nov 30, 2007 2:05 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 1:50 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm getting the exception below when i try to register a contribution in
> > a
> > node thats running in a s
On Nov 30, 2007 1:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have discussed this behaviour before and I was sort of convinced last
> time but now I'm playing with the store sample I'm not so sure. This
> features comes about because of the store composite, for example,
>
>
>
>
I'm getting the exception below when i try to register a contribution in a
node thats running in a separate JVM from the domain. Does this mean all
contributions in nodes also need to be in the classpath used by the domain?
INFO: Registered node: http://localhost:8080/tuscany/ at endpoint
http://L
On Nov 28, 2007 11:41 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2007 10:24 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 27, 2007 4:11 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > ant elder wrote:
>
On Nov 27, 2007 4:11 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
>
> > On Nov 27, 2007 2:29 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>On Nov 27, 2007 2:25 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Nov 27, 2007 2:29 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2007 2:25 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've just committed a runtime-war module as a start of whats being
> > talked
> > about here, which could b
I've just committed a runtime-war module as a start of whats being talked
about here, which could be merged or replace distribution/webapp at some
point. I'll post some more details later. One comment inline below:
...ant
On Nov 23, 2007 6:00 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm
On Nov 27, 2007 11:47 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2007 11:31 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Nov 27, 2007 11:24 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
On Nov 27, 2007 11:24 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2007 10:46 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 27, 2007 10:01 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 27, 2007 9:47 AM, ant
On Nov 27, 2007 10:01 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 9:47 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm getting some errors building node-impl on the latest trunk code,
> > anyone
> > else seeing this o
I'm getting some errors building node-impl on the latest trunk code, anyone
else seeing this or is it something in my local environment?
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: null
at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:53)
at
org.
On Nov 22, 2007 1:57 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
> > [snip]
> > Simon Nash wrote:
> >
> >> Samples are very important for beginning users. For users who have
> >> moved beyond that stage and are doing real development using Tuscany,
> >> samples a
On Nov 17, 2007 5:49 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I was only considering the first composite as I still think that a node
> should only run a single composite :)
>
>
Ok, any helpful suggestions on the discussion in [1] relating to problems
starting a domain and multiple
On Nov 19, 2007 10:22 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just committed changes to the Jetty and Tomcat host containers.
> (r596243 and r596246) to ensure that URLs are formed correctly when
> context
> is included in the Node URI, e.g.
>
> http://localhost:8080/somecontext
>
> is co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1782.
--
Resolution: Fixed
fixed
> Minor issues with RELEASE_NOTES f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1785.
--
Resolution: Fixed
fixed
> INSTALL file still refers to the 0.91 July rele
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-1907:
---
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
> Dynamic Wiring: Adding a new component to a contribut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-1911:
---
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
> Amazon Cart for Tutor
On Nov 18, 2007 9:31 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm starting a new thread for this as suggested by Sebastien.
>
> Simon
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
> > On Nov 15, 2007 6:54 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > (cut)
> >>
> >>I don't think we should put sample dependenc
On Nov 17, 2007 6:18 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I think that there are two types of "sample dependencies":
>
> A) samples/store uses implementation-data; implementation-data can
> technically run with other databases, but we've selected derby as our
> preferred databas
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Rajini Sivaram to become a
Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Rajini!
...ant
Cool, seems fine to me then.
...ant
On Nov 16, 2007 4:41 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, the new code will try to parse the {namespace}localPart format 1st
> and
> then fail over to namespace#localPart.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Origi
On Nov 16, 2007 11:41 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2007 11:25 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Nov 16, 2007 10:58 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
On Nov 16, 2007 11:25 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2007 10:58 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 13, 2007 4:25 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 13, 2007 4:06 PM, ant eld
On Nov 13, 2007 4:25 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2007 4:06 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Trying to run a domain manager node within a webapp and it fails as
> right
> > now you can only use a domain manager url withou
We only need these legal files for artifacts we'll be distributing
individually - so thats just the things in the sca/modules directory which
go in the maven repository not the samples and itests. I think its better to
not have them where they're not needed so unless someone complains I'm going
to
On Nov 15, 2007 5:38 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The StAXArtifactProcessor extension point currently uses the
> "namespace#localPart" syntax for the qname attribute in the service
> registration file
>
> (META-INF/services/org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.processor.StA
On Nov 16, 2007 7:50 AM, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thinking about RDB DAS Next release, there can be different
> interesting features to add like -
>
> 1- Integration with SCA policy and transaction support
> 2- Data Services (following DAS Specification investigations/dir
On Nov 15, 2007 3:30 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If
> > implementation-data needs derby to be used then whats wrong with
> defining
> > that as a dependency?
> implementation-data doesn't require derby, you should be able to use it
> with another database.
>
> > Thats
On Nov 14, 2007 9:11 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Luciano Resende wrote:
> > Try removing the test scope from derby dependency on the
> > implementation-data pom.
> >
>
> Did that and it works around the problem, but it's a workaround :)
>
>
Why is doing this in the impl
On Nov 14, 2007 7:29 AM, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Luciano:
> Distribution artifact names : I'd follow the same naming of previous
> native releases [1] and use tuscany_das_cpp-1.0-incubator-M4-bin.zip
> I'm also not sure if the native project wants to start using
> incubating
nks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 9:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java SCA Release 1.1 was: Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Tuscany
> SCA Roadmap
On Nov 13, 2007 4:31 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
>
> > On Nov 13, 2007 11:02 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Nov 9, 2007 7:05 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
ntext class.
>
> Is it OK to remove this method and go back to a 2.4 compile
> dependency? I tried doing this and the generated war ran OK in
> Tomcat 6.0.14. Why do we currently use this method and have the
> 2.5 dependency if everything is OK without it?
>
> Simon
>
&
Do we want to support pre-2.5 level servlet containers? If so then maybe we
should use the 2.4 version so things don't inadvertently use 2.5 only APIs.
...ant
On Nov 13, 2007 1:59 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This sounds like a useful change to get all of our dependenci
> rather than trying to get something out in December just before the
> > > holidays. Also, December releases tend not to get immediate pickup
> > > and adoption because of people being out for the holidays.
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> >
I've had a quick look, these look pretty good to me.
There are a few standard Apache files that you need to add, all
distributions should have LICENSE, NOTICE, README and RELEASE_NOTES files,
and src distributions should have a BUILDING file, bin distributions an
INSTALL file. You can see some exa
On Nov 12, 2007 12:15 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 11:58 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 12, 2007 11:42 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 8, 2007 10:56 AM, R
t; > have
> > > > > > the same set of jars for both an OSGi and non-OSGi distribution.
> > > More
> > > > > fine
> > > > > > grained jars provide better versioning under OSGi, but requires
> > the
> > > > > > maintenance of more package depend
; - Venkat
>
> On Nov 9, 2007 11:26 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Good Ant, looks good to me.
> >
> > On Nov 9, 2007 9:50 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've made quite a lot of updates.
> > >
On Nov 10, 2007 2:18 PM, Antollini, Mario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am trying to compile a tutorial located in
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/tutorial/ but
> I did not get lucky so far.
>
>
>
> All the artifacts refer to version 1.1-incubating-SNAP
On Nov 8, 2007 11:06 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/8/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I like this idea a lot. For one thing it would mean applications don't
> > have
> > to know anything about Tuscany so could
I've made quite a lot of updates.
...ant
On Nov 9, 2007 4:30 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have added couple more things there too... it would be great if
> others could review and update by EOD today, then I'd move this to the
> Incubator wiki at night.
>
> On Nov 9, 200
On Nov 9, 2007 11:31 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 9, 2007 11:18 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 5, 2007 3:54 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/23/07, wang feng < [EMAI
On Nov 5, 2007 3:54 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/23/07, wang feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > hi Jean-Sebastien,
> >
> > Please see my comments below.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > wangfeng
> >
> >
> > On 2007-10-20, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >wang
This appears to have also fixed the old "connection refused" problem some of
us have been getting
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200708.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
).
Never got to the bottom of that and its made one of my old machines pretty
much unusable for building Tuscany
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-1871.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Classloading : Application contribution classload
+1, looks good to me.
...ant
On Nov 7, 2007 10:35 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release artifacts of
> Tuscany
> SCA for Java.
>
> The RC5 contains a few fixes to issues discovered in RC4. Thank you for
> reporting and fix
ctober 31, 2007 4:33:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1884) Allow the setting of the
> contribution root in the web.xml
>
>
> It does! Thanks Ant.
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Bob Marbeck <[EMAI
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Mark Combellack to become
a Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Mark!
...ant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539331
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1885:
This is great! I'm sure there's people would find hiberna
On 11/1/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release artifacts of
> Tuscany SCA for Java.
>
> The RC3 contains a few fixes to issues discovered in RC2 (build.xml for
> web apps, distributed calculator and excesssive jars). Thank you
I created a new release on JIRA: Cpp-M4( not sure if it's the best
> > name, suggestions? ). We could start to set the JIRAs that are supposed
> > to be fixed before this release to Cpp-M4 and leave the others to
> > Cpp-next.
> >
> > Suggestions?
> >
> &
On 10/31/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Raymond,
>
> I did set out to fix the build.xml, but it seems like Luciano has gone
> ahead
> with it already.
>
> - Venkat
>
> On 10/31/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Simon/Venkat.
> >
> > Please fix the build
On 10/31/07, Bob Marbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That tuscany.war sounded interesting so i gave it a try but it doesn't
> seem to work. The Tomcat console shows:
>
> 31-Oct-2007 15:43:11
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.webapp.WarContextListeneraddContribution
> INFO: Added contribution: file:/C:/T
, create a folder "c:\TuscanyRepository" and then
copy sca contribution jars to that folder and they should get hot deployed
(hot update of previously deployed contributions isn't go just now).
...ant
On 10/31/07, ant elder (JIRA) wrote:
>
>
> [
> https://issues.apa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-1884:
--
Assignee: (was: ant elder)
> Allow the setting of the contribution root in the web.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539051
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1884:
Thanks for the patch, this is an interesting idea.
This isn't bas
On 10/31/07, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Implementation scripts are currently resolved by the thread context
> classloader.
>
> The code in org.apache.tuscany.sca.extension.helper.utils.
> ResourceUtil.readResource(String scriptName) is:
> ...
> //FIXME The cla
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-1884:
--
Assignee: ant elder
> Allow the setting of the contribution root in the web.
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 10/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 10/
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > > On 10/3
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> O
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/30/07, Simon L
On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > If you've an SCANode that is already running (you
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If you've an SCANode that is already running (you've added composites
> and
> > started the node) and then you add additional compo
On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>
> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
> sca/tools/wsdl2java
> sca/tools/java2wsdl
> sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
> sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsd
If you've an SCANode that is already running (you've added composites and
started the node) and then you add additional composites there doesn't seem
to be any way to start just those newly added composites. I can call
SCANode.start and that kind of works but it starts all the existing already
star
On 10/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can add a create to the node factory which explicity omits domain
> information to make this clearer.
>
> public SCANode createSCANode(String nodeURI)
That would be nice.
...ant
On 10/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > Is it intended for the new SCANode/Domain stuff to work without a
> separate
> > Domain management node? I'm trying to get the Tuscany Geronimo code and
> > webapp distr
Another issue is that there are number of new jars in the lib folder that
weren't there in the 1.0 release. If they are now needed the LICENSE and
NOTICE files need to be updated but I think most of them probably aren't
needed so whats bringing them in needs to be tracked down and an
added.
..
Is it intended for the new SCANode/Domain stuff to work without a separate
Domain management node? I'm trying to get the Tuscany Geronimo code and
webapp distro working again and it always seems to require a domain node
running somewhere (eg running the distributed calculator DomainNode), same
with
Just an fyi, I came across a repository with all the Saxon releases just
now: http://dist.wso2.org/maven2/net/sf/saxon/
Don't know if 8.9 has new features we need but its much more recent than the
8.7 we're currently using so could be worth using that repository to
upgrade.
...ant
On 9/13/07,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12537969
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1871:
Looks good to me, patch applied. Many thanks for the code Rajini
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-1871:
--
Assignee: ant elder
> Classloading : Application contribution classload
You need to build the binary distribution which is done by running mvn in
the distribution folder. This is mentioned in the BUILDING file in SVN [1]
but we should also mention this in the developer guide [2], thanks for point
it out I'll go update it to add a section on this.
...ant
[1]
https:
nd keep
> them working rather than disabling them. Is there any way to
> keep the old applications using SCADomain.js running, while supporting
> and recommending the new approach using jsonrpc.js?
>
>Simon
>
> ant elder wrote:
>
> > On 10/22/07, Luciano Resend
On 10/25/07, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This does imply splitting both Tuscany extension bundle
> and the big 3rd party bundle, into smaller chunks. Because of its size, I
> am
> more inclined to split the 3rd party bundle into smaller bundles first
> (though I have no idea where
601 - 700 of 2924 matches
Mail list logo
