Pete Robbins wrote:
On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the plane on my way to ApacheCon I was playing around with our Web
Services support (adding a Web Services client to BigBank) and found a
serious problem in Axis2Client and WSServiceProxy, which allocate the
We need to consider the pass by-value vs pass by-reference semantics,
including deep copying the DataObject tree. I have thought about his and
we should discuss this after M2. I'll put together a proposal on another
thread.
For now though I would change your patch and have Operation allocate and
Pete Robbins wrote:
We need to consider the pass by-value vs pass by-reference semantics,
including deep copying the DataObject tree. I have thought about his
and
we should discuss this after M2. I'll put together a proposal on another
thread.
For now though I would change your patch and have
On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
We need to consider the pass by-value vs pass by-reference semantics,
including deep copying the DataObject tree. I have thought about his
and
we should discuss this after M2. I'll put together a proposal on
Sebastien,
fyi I'm looking and this and will have a different fix up there later
today/tomorrow so no need for us both to look at it ;-)
Cheers,
On 10/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
We need
Pete Robbins wrote:
Sebastien,
fyi I'm looking and this and will have a different fix up there later
today/tomorrow so no need for us both to look at it ;-)
Cheers,
On 10/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete
Pete Robbins wrote:
Sounds about right. I need to add Ruby and Python extensions into the
windows command line build. Hopefully this will be done today.
Cheers,
On 09/10/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick one to find out where we are with items for C++ M2 RC1.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
Sounds about right. I need to add Ruby and Python extensions into the
windows command line build. Hopefully this will be done today.
Cheers,
On 09/10/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick one to find out where we
That looks good. I think Andy was going to generate/zip/sign/publish the
packages for the distros. I tried Python 2.5 on Windows but had to go down
to 2.4 so we'll stick there!
Cheers,
On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
Sounds about right. I
btw I changed the cpp/sca/build.sh to detect if you had the PYTHON_xxx and
RUBY_xxx environment set and to configure with --enable-python --enable-ruby
if they were.
Cheers,
On 10/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That looks good. I think Andy was going to generate/zip/sign/publish
Pete Robbins wrote:
That looks good. I think Andy was going to generate/zip/sign/publish the
packages for the distros. I tried Python 2.5 on Windows but had to go
down
to 2.4 so we'll stick there!
Cheers,
On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
2.4.3 is what we have working on Win. I'm sure 2.5 would be fine but it was
pre-req'ing vc7.x and a particular .Net framework level... a right pain!
We will probably, no definitely, build our windows distros with vc7 as we
think Python requires it. But then.. the Ruby extension won't compile
Pete Robbins wrote:
2.4.3 is what we have working on Win. I'm sure 2.5 would be fine but
it was
pre-req'ing vc7.x and a particular .Net framework level... a right pain!
We will probably, no definitely, build our windows distros with vc7 as we
think Python requires it. But then.. the Ruby
1.8.5
On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
2.4.3 is what we have working on Win. I'm sure 2.5 would be fine but
it was
pre-req'ing vc7.x and a particular .Net framework level... a right pain!
We will probably, no definitely, build our windows
Hi all,
Just a quick one to find out where we are with items for C++ M2 RC1.
From recent commits I think the status is:
SDO
- Stdcxx as a build option on Linux and Windows - done, aside from
Linux support, probably not going to include Linux support
- Support for an identified level of the
On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the plane on my way to ApacheCon I was playing around with our Web
Services support (adding a Web Services client to BigBank) and found a
serious problem in Axis2Client and WSServiceProxy, which allocate the
DataObject pointers
Sounds about right. I need to add Ruby and Python extensions into the
windows command line build. Hopefully this will be done today.
Cheers,
On 09/10/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick one to find out where we are with items for C++ M2 RC1.
From recent commits I
17 matches
Mail list logo