Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Pete Robbins wrote: On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the plane on my way to ApacheCon I was playing around with our Web Services support (adding a Web Services client to BigBank) and found a serious problem in Axis2Client and WSServiceProxy, which allocate the

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Pete Robbins
We need to consider the pass by-value vs pass by-reference semantics, including deep copying the DataObject tree. I have thought about his and we should discuss this after M2. I'll put together a proposal on another thread. For now though I would change your patch and have Operation allocate and

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Pete Robbins wrote: We need to consider the pass by-value vs pass by-reference semantics, including deep copying the DataObject tree. I have thought about his and we should discuss this after M2. I'll put together a proposal on another thread. For now though I would change your patch and have

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Pete Robbins
On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pete Robbins wrote: We need to consider the pass by-value vs pass by-reference semantics, including deep copying the DataObject tree. I have thought about his and we should discuss this after M2. I'll put together a proposal on

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Pete Robbins
Sebastien, fyi I'm looking and this and will have a different fix up there later today/tomorrow so no need for us both to look at it ;-) Cheers, On 10/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pete Robbins wrote: We need

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Pete Robbins wrote: Sebastien, fyi I'm looking and this and will have a different fix up there later today/tomorrow so no need for us both to look at it ;-) Cheers, On 10/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pete

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Pete Robbins wrote: Sounds about right. I need to add Ruby and Python extensions into the windows command line build. Hopefully this will be done today. Cheers, On 09/10/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Just a quick one to find out where we are with items for C++ M2 RC1.

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Pete Robbins wrote: Sounds about right. I need to add Ruby and Python extensions into the windows command line build. Hopefully this will be done today. Cheers, On 09/10/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Just a quick one to find out where we

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Pete Robbins
That looks good. I think Andy was going to generate/zip/sign/publish the packages for the distros. I tried Python 2.5 on Windows but had to go down to 2.4 so we'll stick there! Cheers, On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pete Robbins wrote: Sounds about right. I

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Pete Robbins
btw I changed the cpp/sca/build.sh to detect if you had the PYTHON_xxx and RUBY_xxx environment set and to configure with --enable-python --enable-ruby if they were. Cheers, On 10/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That looks good. I think Andy was going to generate/zip/sign/publish

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Pete Robbins wrote: That looks good. I think Andy was going to generate/zip/sign/publish the packages for the distros. I tried Python 2.5 on Windows but had to go down to 2.4 so we'll stick there! Cheers, On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pete Robbins wrote:

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Pete Robbins
2.4.3 is what we have working on Win. I'm sure 2.5 would be fine but it was pre-req'ing vc7.x and a particular .Net framework level... a right pain! We will probably, no definitely, build our windows distros with vc7 as we think Python requires it. But then.. the Ruby extension won't compile

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Pete Robbins wrote: 2.4.3 is what we have working on Win. I'm sure 2.5 would be fine but it was pre-req'ing vc7.x and a particular .Net framework level... a right pain! We will probably, no definitely, build our windows distros with vc7 as we think Python requires it. But then.. the Ruby

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-10 Thread Pete Robbins
1.8.5 On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pete Robbins wrote: 2.4.3 is what we have working on Win. I'm sure 2.5 would be fine but it was pre-req'ing vc7.x and a particular .Net framework level... a right pain! We will probably, no definitely, build our windows

[C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-09 Thread Andrew Borley
Hi all, Just a quick one to find out where we are with items for C++ M2 RC1. From recent commits I think the status is: SDO - Stdcxx as a build option on Linux and Windows - done, aside from Linux support, probably not going to include Linux support - Support for an identified level of the

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-09 Thread Pete Robbins
On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the plane on my way to ApacheCon I was playing around with our Web Services support (adding a Web Services client to BigBank) and found a serious problem in Axis2Client and WSServiceProxy, which allocate the DataObject pointers

Re: [C++] M2 RC1 status

2006-10-09 Thread Pete Robbins
Sounds about right. I need to add Ruby and Python extensions into the windows command line build. Hopefully this will be done today. Cheers, On 09/10/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Just a quick one to find out where we are with items for C++ M2 RC1. From recent commits I