Have a couple of question about release -
What will be the name of the Java SDO release?
After checking Java-SDO-Next and Java-SDO-CTS-Next from ASF-JIRA and
referring to
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg25868.html
I have tried to gather a list of all JIRAs (Fixed,
Hi Amita,
looking at the size of the list of fixed JIRAs and the balance of
improvements/New features to bug fixes I would have thought this would
warrant a title of Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating
I'll respond about the pending JIRAs a bit later.
Kelvin.
On 16/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL
It's high time we spun this release. There are various patches still to
apply I know, although I haven't done the ground work recently to collate
all the info. Is there anyone out there who might be prepared to be release
manager for this? I'd be happy to provide guidance.
Kelvin.
On
Hi,
I would like to do Release Management activities for this SDO release. It
will be a good learning
for me. Appreciate your help.
Regards,
Amita
On Jan 15, 2008 6:42 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's high time we spun this release. There are various patches still to
apply I
Hi Rajini,
thanks for this. Our problem is that because the SDO spec says we must
support Java 1.4, and versions of EMF from 2.3 and beyond require Java 5,
we are blocked from advancing beyond EMF 2.2.3. Your Bugzilla doesn't
mention the version of EMF, but sadly I'm pretty sure there's no
Kelvin,
Following on from the notes from John Conlon (
http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/article.php?id=29577group=eclipse.tools.emf#29577)
and Jeff McAffer (
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00673.html), I have
opened an EMF Bugzilla
Rajini, I think you are right. I'll apply the patch as is, and we can
tackle the issue of Felix as a community if and when specific the need
arises.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 08/01/2008, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kelvin,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293 contains
Hi Rajini,
Now that the New Year has arrived, do you think you'll be able to take a
look at this?
Thanks, Kelvin.
On 11/12/2007, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kelvin,
I am busy until Christmas with the SCA-OSGi work, but I will try and look
at
the OSGi-enablement of SDO early
Kelvin,
Yes, I have been looking at this for the last couple of days as promised. I
will attach a patch to the JIRA later today.
Here is a summary of the changes:
- Since HelperProvider API and HelperProviderImpl are in two different
OSGi bundles, loaded by different classloaders,
Thanks Rajini,
I propose we hold on until January in the hope that you will be able to
tackle this.
Many thanks, Kelvin.
On 11/12/2007, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kelvin,
I am busy until Christmas with the SCA-OSGi work, but I will try and look
at
the OSGi-enablement of SDO
Kelvin,
I am busy until Christmas with the SCA-OSGi work, but I will try and look at
the OSGi-enablement of SDO early in the new year. At the moment I can't
promise anything, but from the notes that you produced about classloading,
and the code and comments from Bert, I think there is enough
I'd kind of hoped to be in a position to have a release before the end of
the year. The JIRA query [1] shows that we have 34 JIRAs in resolved state
with a fix version of SDO-Next, but I think it would be good to get the OSGi
issues dealt with before a release. Thoughts?
Kelvin.
[1]
Kelvin,
I have some free cycles, so I'd like to help knock some things off
this list for you. I've gone ahead and contributed a patch for 1483.
I'll address 1545 as well. I believe that 1384 is already done.
On Nov 20, 2007 6:36 AM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What should we be
David,
thanks for the fixes. I'll apply them as soon as I can get to
them. I've been away unwell for most of the last weeks so I have some
catching up to do. Anything you can do to reduce the JIRA backlog
further would be great, thanks.
Kelvin.
On 29/11/2007, David Adcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
21/11/2007 12:49
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Java SDO] What should we be attacking?
Rajini,
Many thanks for your offer of help here!. We don't have
documentation on this, but I hope
that
classloader to load the implementation classes.
Bert
Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22/11/2007 12:57
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Java SDO] What should we be attacking?
Bert,
Thank you for your note.
I had a look
that
classloader to load the implementation classes.
Bert
Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22/11/2007 12:57
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Java SDO] What should we be attacking?
Bert,
Thank you for your note
Kelvin,
I ran into the same NPE as TUSCANY-1293 yesterday when running Tuscany SCA
under OSGi. I would be very keen to see this fixed so that SCA
databinding-sdo can be used under OSGi. I will be happy to help with the
classloading/OSGi issues, but I have no understanding of the architecture of
Rajini,
Many thanks for your offer of help here!. We don't have
documentation on this, but I hope as a community we can develop it.
I have created a page in the wiki to begin organising our thoughts
[0]. My problem is I don't have sufficient feel for the issues in
OSGi to understand how best
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
21/11/2007 12:49
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Java SDO] What should we be attacking?
Rajini,
Many thanks for your offer of help here!. We don't have
documentation on this, but I hope
What should we be concentrating our efforts on in SDO Java. I posted
a while back to suggest we think about the content of a next release.
We've had a few fixes go in recently, but I'd like to see more
consideration of release content before we crank the handle. It would
be great to see a
21 matches
Mail list logo
