[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2007 17:19
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
The Junit tooling is so useful I'd be loath to drop it as the harness
that the Tuscany implementation uses
goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 April 2007 11:03
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
In fact I'd say for the purposed of introspection by some other harness
the old style is far preferable
-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
In fact I'd say for the purposed of introspection by some other harness
the old style is far preferable, since it's easy to examine the method
names/signatures to determine
A quick correction on my previous note which reflects a bias towards the
junit 3.8 approach that I didn't really intend.
some static code that performed any real startup overhead and cached the
helper. This all leads me to believing that to get true agnosticism wrt the
test harness we should
-
From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 April 2007 11:03
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
In fact I'd say for the purposed of introspection by some other
harness the old style
The Junit tooling is so useful I'd be loath to drop it as the harness that
the Tuscany implementation uses for exercising the tests. I'm going to do a
bit of playing to see what solutions are practical, but I'm concerned that
we may be considering putting significant effort into a goal that's
.
-Original Message-
From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2007 17:19
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
The Junit tooling is so useful I'd be loath to drop
rather than putting an extra burden on
developing the general purpose CTS.
Thanks,
Andy.
-Original Message-
From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2007 17:19
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Budinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 April 2007 18:01
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
Hi Andy,
Java allows you make something more visible in a derived
.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of kelvin goodson
Sent: 17 April 2007 16:59
To: Andy Grove
Cc: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
Andy,
that's
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Cc: Robbie Minshall
Subject: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when classes
don't inherit from TestCase
Hi,
I'm looking at doing some work in the CTS. I was looking back at
Robbie's attached description about how to keep the tests harness
agnostic
. Is everyone happy with this?
Thanks,
Andy.
-Original Message-
From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 April 2007 14:53
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
Yes, I was about
-
From: Frank Budinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 April 2007 17:03
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
Hi Andy,
Maybe this is a stupid question (my junit ignorance showing through
.
-Original Message-
From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 April 2007 14:53
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
Yes, I was about to write to the list on this subject. I'd like
4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes
don't inherit from TestCase
Hi,
I'm looking at doing some work in the CTS. I was looking back at
Robbie's attached description about how to keep the tests harness
agnostic. I'm assuming that this is still a goal of the CTS although
I
may have missed
goodson
Sent: 16 April 2007 14:42
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Cc: Robbie Minshall
Subject: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes
don't inherit from TestCase
Hi,
I'm looking at doing some work in the CTS. I was looking back at
Robbie's attached
]
Sent: 17 April 2007 17:03
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
Hi Andy,
Maybe this is a stupid question (my junit ignorance showing through :-),
but couldn't you have run your simple test
but no dependency on the junit test
runner class.
Hope that helps.
Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 April 2007 14:35
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when
classes don't inherit from TestCase
Yes, I was about to write to the list on this subject. I'd like to
understand more of how the test harness agnosticism was intended, and
whether its really practical. As it stands
for calling setUp when classes
don't inherit from TestCase
Hi,
I'm looking at doing some work in the CTS. I was looking back at
Robbie's attached description about how to keep the tests harness
agnostic. I'm assuming that this is still a goal of the CTS although I
may have missed something in my
Sent: 16 April 2007 14:42
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Cc: Robbie Minshall
Subject: [Java SDO CTS] Junit 4.1 pattern for calling setUp when classes
don't inherit from TestCase
Hi,
I'm looking at doing some work in the CTS. I was looking back at
Robbie's attached description about how to keep
21 matches
Mail list logo
