Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-973) HttpSessionScopeContainer should use the HttpSession for session persistance

2006-12-19 Thread ant elder
Was there any consensus reach on what to do for this? There was a few emails about it, the last one: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] It wasn't very clear to me what the resetting the object into the servlet context if state change occurs

Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-973) HttpSessionScopeContainer should use the HttpSession for session persistance

2006-12-19 Thread Jim Marino
On Dec 19, 2006, at 9:31 AM, ant elder wrote: Was there any consensus reach on what to do for this? There was a few emails about it, the last one: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200612.mbox/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] It wasn't very clear to me what the resetting the

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-973) HttpSessionScopeContainer should use the HttpSession for session persistance

2006-12-06 Thread Jim Marino (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-973?page=comments#action_12456118 ] Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-973: This needs to implement semantics similar to conversational persistence and not just use the ServletContext as a

HTTPSession state, was: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-973) HttpSessionScopeContainer should use the HttpSession for session persistance

2006-12-06 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Dec 6, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Jim Marino (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-973? page=comments#action_12456118 ] Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-973: This needs to implement semantics similar to conversational persistence and

Re: HTTPSession state, was: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-973) HttpSessionScopeContainer should use the HttpSession for session persistance

2006-12-06 Thread Jim Marino
On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: On Dec 6, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Jim Marino (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-973? page=comments#action_12456118 ] Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-973: This needs to implement