I'd like to re-start this thread to get started on implementing
conversational services according to the assembly and c+i for Java specs.
The following items need to be addressed:
SessionScopeContainer - A new class that needs to be created, in addition to
HttpSessionScopeContainer, since
Ok, I'll re-re-start the thread, you can disregard the previous two tries,
apologies for the inconvenience.
I'd like to get started on implementing conversational services according to
the assembly and c+i for Java specs.
The following items need to be addressed:
SessionScopeContain
One last time, I am really sorry for the inconvenience, you can tell I am
not having much fun with gmail's editor.
I'd like to re-start the thread to get started on implementing
conversational services according to the assembly and c+i for Java specs.
The following items need to be
could try the convention of
using a reference prop or parm in the source epr (wsa:From).
On 11/8/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to re-start this thread to get started on implementing
conversational services according to the assembly and c+i for Java specs.
On Nov 8, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
I'd like to re-start this thread to get started on implementing
conversational services according to the assembly and c+i for Java
specs.
The following items need to be addressed:
SessionScopeContainer - A new class that needs
Quick question: Is there an annotation that marks an interface as
conversational?
Cheers,
--
Pete
ion
@Scope("CONVERSATION") is used in passing, so it looks like
the spec needs to be revised anyway.
For the current SCA/Java implementation of conversational services
just getting under way, the current thought is to use
@Scope("CONVERSATIONAL")
On 11/11/06, Pete Robbins <
t;conversation". We also
need a description for scopes to be placed back in the Java C&I spec
(it was originally in, moved to Assembly, and then the spec group
decided to move it back to the respective C&I specs) so I'll include
this in that proposal.
Jim
For the current SC
I have checked in code to complete a minimal implementation of
conversational services, including a sample adapted from the C&I
spec. Still not using UUID for conversation ids, need to change.
Rick, you can go ahead and test it (I did not include the sample
in the main pom, you can run it
roup
> decided to move it back to the respective C&I specs) so I'll include
> this in that proposal.
>
> Jim
>
> > For the current SCA/Java implementation of conversational services
> > just getting under way, the current thought is to use
> > @Scope("CONVERSATIO
d in code to complete a minimal implementation of
conversational services, including a sample adapted from the C&I
spec. Still not using UUID for conversation ids, need to change.
Rick, you can go ahead and test it (I did not include the sample
in the main pom, you can run it from its own dir
11 matches
Mail list logo
