Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-05-02 Thread ant elder
On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] Simon Laws wrote: > >> - tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding >> >> >> Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi. >> We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the RMI binding. The tuscany-rmi modul

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-05-02 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Simon Laws wrote: On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] Simon Laws wrote: > >> - tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding >> >> >> Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi. >> We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the RMI binding. Th

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-05-02 Thread Simon Laws
On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] Simon Laws wrote: > >> - tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding >> >> >> Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi. >> We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the RMI binding. The tuscany-rmi modul

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-05-02 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[snip] Simon Laws wrote: - tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi. We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the RMI binding. The tuscany-rmi module defines an RMI hosting extension point, similar to how the tuscany-h

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-05-02 Thread Paulo Henrique Trecenti
Hi, I believe that it is better to wait until having a more consistent version of what already it is. 2007/5/2, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-05-02 Thread ant elder
On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 4/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Excellent thanks, thats type type feedback I was looking for! Comments > > in

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-05-02 Thread Simon Laws
On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Excellent thanks, thats type type feedback I was looking for! Comments > in > > line... > > > > On 4/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-05-02 Thread ant elder
On 5/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Excellent thanks, thats type type feedback I was looking for! Comments in > line... > > On 4/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have a few questions and suggesti

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-05-02 Thread Simon Laws
On 4/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Excellent thanks, thats type type feedback I was looking for! Comments in line... On 4/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a few questions and suggestions. > - tuscany-sca.jar contains .svn directories, I guess they

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-04-30 Thread ant elder
Excellent thanks, thats type type feedback I was looking for! Comments in line... On 4/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a few questions and suggestions. - tuscany-sca.jar contains .svn directories, I guess they should be removed from the JAR. I can't see thes

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-04-30 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
ant elder wrote: On 4/29/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do we want the Tuscany SCA distribution to look like for the next release? I'll suggest the following straw man as start, please suggest changes. I'm using the name 'beta1' here till we decide on the real name. All the ar

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-04-29 Thread ant elder
I guess this is the question about what should we call the next release - M3 or beta1 or something else? See: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...ant On 4/29/07, 王洪伟 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: why not with a sign --M3 ? like this : tuscan

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-04-29 Thread ant elder
On 4/29/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do we want the Tuscany SCA distribution to look like for the next release? I'll suggest the following straw man as start, please suggest changes. I'm using the name 'beta1' here till we decide on the real name. All the artifacts in the defau

Re: Next SCA release distributions

2007-04-29 Thread 王洪伟
why not with a sign --M3 ? like this : tuscany-sca-1.0-M3-beta1.zip tuscany-sca-1.0-M3-beta1.tar.gz tuscany-sca-1.0-M3-beta1-src.zip tuscany-sca-1.0-M3-beta1-src.tar.gz 2007/4/29, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: What do we want the Tuscany SCA distribution to look like for the next release? I'l

Next SCA release distributions

2007-04-29 Thread ant elder
What do we want the Tuscany SCA distribution to look like for the next release? I'll suggest the following straw man as start, please suggest changes. I'm using the name 'beta1' here till we decide on the real name. All the artifacts in the default build would be published to the maven repository