Bill,
We are prototyping some code which require SCA modules running in an OSGi
container, and would be very keen on using your implementation (SCA
container built using OSGi). If you have prototype code which already runs
with Felix, would it be possible for you to submit the code? At the
for hosting SCA.
Cheers,
Joel
-Original Message-
From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Sebastien,
Graham and I will be looking
-
From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Sebastien,
Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA
contributions as OSGi
ant elder wrote:
This itest has been fixed now with TUSCANY-1569 so how about including
implementation-osgi in the 0.99 release? It would add about 500K of Felix
dependencies which doesn't seem a big deal, so i think we should include it.
...ant
+1 to include it. Yesterday there was a
for hosting SCA.
Cheers,
Joel
-Original Message-
From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Sebastien,
Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging
: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Sebastien,
Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA
contributions as OSGi bundles, once the work on implementation.osgi is
complete.
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing
OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA.
Cheers,
Joel
-Original Message-
From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi
ahead? Like Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing
OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA.
Cheers,
Joel
-Original Message-
From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA
? Like Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing
OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA.
Cheers,
Joel
-Original Message-
From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi
Sebastien,
Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA
contributions as OSGi bundles, once the work on implementation.osgi is
complete.
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Barnhill wrote:
Hi,
As I may have
Thanks! Its great to hear you're doing this. A src zip attached to a jira is
fine if that's easiest for you, a diff patch is better for updating existing
code but as this is mostly new code/modules a zip is likely easiest. It
doesn't have to be perfect to submit the patch, its always tempting to
Hi,
I've made some progress using host embedded, and have that running within
Felix. I have a barebones module that is also a bundle, but all the regular
modules are in one big Tuscany bundle right now. It's been shelved the past
few weeks due to transitioning to a new project, but now I'm
On 6/21/07, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I still think that explicit bindings are better.
I still think both approaches are valid and it depends on what you're
trying to achieve :-) . If you're trying to include OSGi bundles in
your SCA domain, the only way to do this is
Bill Barnhill wrote:
Hi,
As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the SCA-OSGi
integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions, using
OSGi as
an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an extension
mechanism, dependency resolution and service
Nachricht-
Von: Graham Charters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 17:10
An: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Hi Nicole,
My turn to chip in :-)
I think both approaches are valid and tackle two different goals. If
I understand
describe what you have in mind, e.g. where you
are planning to
declare the non-OSGi SCA Component?
Thanks
Nicole
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Graham Charters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2007 10:07
An: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi
An: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Hi Nicole/Rajini,
I'm wondering if there is some confusion over terminology and the
scenarios being discussed. I believe Rajini is only referring to OSGi
bundles integrated into SCA through an implementation.osgi /. So
Hi Nicole/Rajini,
I'm wondering if there is some confusion over terminology and the
scenarios being discussed. I believe Rajini is only referring to OSGi
bundles integrated into SCA through an implementation.osgi /. So in
these scenarios both components are SCA components. Perhaps for
clarity
Hi Rajini,
good to hear that you're going to contribute to SCA-OSGi :-)
We wrote a paper about the different possibilities of combining OSGi and
SCA for the SCA drumbeat end of march. You can find it on the OSOA
homepage:
http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/SCA+Resources.
The paper contains a high
I will submit the code through JIRA once it is ready. If there is already
documentation about the Tuscany SPIs, I would like to use it, otherwise, the
samples and the Java implementation seem to be quite useful to get started.
OSGi doesn't provide a standard mechanism to start a new runtime, and
On 6/5/07, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will submit the code through JIRA once it is ready. If there is already
documentation about the Tuscany SPIs, I would like to use it, otherwise,
the
samples and the Java implementation seem to be quite useful to get
started.
OSGi doesn't
On 6/4/07, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to contribute to the SCA-OSGi integration activities.
I have been looking at the existing OSGi binding implementation in Tuscany
which exposes SCA services as OSGi services. Even though this binding is
no
longer working
This sounds like a good approach and I would be interested to see
an implementation of this in Tuscany.
I have a question on having Tuscany in control and starting up the
OSGi runtime. I'm no OSGi expert either, but someone once told me that
it's hard for OSGi to run inside another runtime that
Hi,
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 7:22 AM
Subject: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Hello,
I would like to contribute to the SCA-OSGi
Hi,
As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the SCA-OSGi
integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions, using OSGi as
an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an extension
mechanism, dependency resolution and service registry capabilities.
I
25 matches
Mail list logo
