As I started documenting the RMI binding SCDL at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+binding.rmi I
wondered if it could use a URI format instead of or as well as the separate
host, port, and servicename attributes? There may be some reason its
doesn't, has it ever
with
the other bindings.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 6/4/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I started documenting the RMI binding SCDL at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+binding.rmi I
wondered if it could use a URI format instead of or as well as the
separat
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As I started documenting the RMI binding SCDL at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+binding.rmi
I
> wondered if it could use a URI format instead of or as well as the
> separate
> host, port, and servicename attributes
gt; wrote:
>
> As I started documenting the RMI binding SCDL at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+binding.rmi
I
> wondered if it could use a URI format instead of or as well as the
> separate
> host, port, and servicename attributes? There may be some reas
r host and port. So, I am open to
> implementing your suggestion and understand it could be more consistent
> with
> the other bindings.
>
> Thanks
>
> - Venkat
>
> On 6/4/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > As I started documenting the RMI
