Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Wojtek Janiszewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:39 AM
To:
Subject: Re: GSoC Project - CORBA Support for Apache Tuscany
Hi, Raymond.
Please t
I hope so yes, but its not yet clear exactly when the DNS changes will
be done. Will let you know as soon as i know anything.
...ant
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the update. What about our web site? Is it going to be hosted at
> http://
Thanks for the update. What about our web site? Is it going to be hosted at
http://tuscany.apache.org soon?
Raymond
--
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:06 PM
To: "tuscany-dev"
Subject: IMPORTANT: TLP SVN move ton
I committed a fix into trunk under r668298. Please go ahead to create a JIRA
and use it to merge the fix into 1.3 branch.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 1:09 PM
To: "tuscany-dev"
Subject: com.
I'll take a look. These sources are generated and supposed to be test
sources.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 1:09 PM
To: "tuscany-dev"
Subject: com.example classes included in the databinding
Luciano Resende wrote:
Is anyone seeing something simmilar as below when trying to run a
top-down build for SCA ?
I'm using red-hat linux and have set MAVEN_OPTS as MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1536m
Hi Luciano,
I see an OutOfMemoryError, but it comes from Maven 2.0.9 when I run the
security profile (mvn t
Hi,
You are setting to the wrong option. Please use the following:
MAVEN_OPTS=-XX:MaxPermSize=384m
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:09 AM
To: "tuscany-dev"
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj
Hi,
Can we create a wiki page to post these information?
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Ramkumar R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:47 AM
To:
Subject: [Summary] Monitor Extension Functionality & How to create a new
monitor extension
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is the brief summary on the monitor extensions, please review the same
> and post your comments and suggestions on the same. This would help us for
> the documentation.
> **
> *Need for Monitor Extension:*
> **The need
use the versioning support
in Tuscany once it is out there?
Personally I see versioned libraries only being used by OSGi users of
Tuscany and hence it makes sense to adopt OSGi best practice and follow
broader version ranges.
- When 3rd party libraries become OSGi-enabled by default, do we
ronment?
> >
> >...ant
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Murtaza Goga
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I built this release last night, built clean.
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: ant eld
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:17 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I've changed the version number and got rid of the
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:17 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I've changed the version number and got rid of the DISCLAIMER files. I'm
> > looking at the getting the distribution build working, chec
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've changed the version number and got rid of the DISCLAIMER files. I'm
> looking at the getting the distribution build working, checking
> LICENSE/NOTICE and dependency versions before cutting an RC0 for us to look
>
below.
Simon
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Mike Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 2:08 PM
To:
Subject: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and
what they contain, was: SCA runtimes
Simon Nash
:
>>>
>>>> I just checked in some improvements in the databinding area after a full
>>>>> clean build. Now I will stay away from the code :-).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Raymond
>>>>> ---
Thanks a lot Ant for all your help
I just forgot to say that you need to remove "geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.jar"
from your lib...
--
Thanks
Nishant Joshi
ant elder wrote:
Last call for any input on what i'll be submitting tomorrow:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/June+2008
...ant
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need to submit our ASF board report by next Monday. I've created a wi
It is a good news for chinese user.Thanks Raymond.
Thanks,
Feng Wang
On 2008-06-14 06:28:01,Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have created a Google group to provide a forum for Chinese-speaking
>developers and users to exchange ideas and practices in Chinese about Tusc
Thanks Mike for putting things in perspective. It always helps to think of
these topics in terms of problem that we are trying to solve and who the
audience is before we get into the details of how to solve it. Your idea of
creating wiki pages for each of these topics will help clarify things
furth
t;
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:16 AM
To:
Subject: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old
domain
modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done
with
things I want to do before cutt
I modified the text a bit. It sounded negative although a lot of good work
has been done.
On 6/15/08, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Last call for any input on what i'll be submitting tomorrow:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/June+2008
>
> ...ant
>
> On Tue,
Last call for any input on what i'll be submitting tomorrow:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/June+2008
...ant
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need to submit our ASF board report by next Monday. I've created a wiki
> page - ht
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Mike Edwards <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
b) A variety of functional components, that represent sets of coherent
> functions.
>
> Each consists of a series of the basic modules, aggregated together.
> Their function in life is to assist developers of applicat
Thank you.
On 6/13/08, Charuka Jayarathna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is the link,
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-started-with-tuscany.html
>
> I found it at
> Apache Tuscany > Home > SCA Overview > SCA Java
>
> Also you can find here,
>
> Apache Tuscany > Home > SCA Over
Following the instructions at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/plugins/tuscany/trunk/README.TXTwhen
i do step (3) it says:
Installation FAILED: A plugin configuration must include one plugin
artifact, not 0
Looking in the geronimo-plugin.xml at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/
Could you give us some idea what problems you are having? Most likely
you'll need a 2.1 to 2.1.1 adapter plugin (not yet written or in svn
AFAIK) and possibly some other modifications.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 14, 2008, at 6:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
I've tried the Tuscany-Geronimo integra
This is awesome, Thanks Raymond. ;)
-Jeff
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a Google group to provide a forum for Chinese-speaking
> developers and users to exchange ideas and practices in Chinese about
> Tuscany and SCA. The group
Trunk is now 1.4-SNAPSHOT in r667767 and a fresh build runs ok for me.
Based on all this thread 1.4-SNAPSHOT isn't perfect but seemed what there
was best consensus for right now. Feel free to revisit and I'd be happy to
do the work to change trunk version to something else if anyone can get
consen
> >> --
> >> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:16 AM
> >> To:
> >> Subject: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?
> >>
> >>
> &
ments in the databinding area after a full
>> clean build. Now I will stay away from the code :-).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>> --
>> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Friday, Ju
"Mike Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 2:08 PM
To:
Subject: Re: Tracking Tuscany extensions, was: Distribution zips and what
they contain, was: SCA runtimes
Simon Nash wrote:
Actually this isn't quite what I was saying. (Sorry that I wasn't
clear.
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Following on from the discussion on OSGi-enabling third party libraries (
http://markmail.org/message/snltdk2yovr6maq5), this thread addresses the
options for versioning Tuscany bundles and 3rd party libraries distributed
with Tuscany and the implications of choosing these o
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
On 6/12/08, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, this is true. But how narrow should the range be? SpringSource assumes
compatibility at major version. Should we assume minor version? Or should we
restrict to revision? Are we saying that we work with 1.3.0, so we woul
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Yes, "stands a chance of working in most situations", where "most" is the
key word. We will work in all situations where applications dont install
different versions of Tuscany's 3rd party libs. Once we have an application
and Tuscany within one OSGi runtime with multiple v
Folks,
I'll chip in with one observation here.
If Tuscany itself allows the use of a range of versions of some 3rd party library, then in principle
given that we attempt a form of test driven development, we should be testing with ALL of the
versions of that 3rd party library.
If we don't do
Simon Nash wrote:
Actually this isn't quite what I was saying. (Sorry that I wasn't clear.)
I'm talking about the lowest level components that we distribute as
binaries, not about larger groupings that are created from these components
to provide convenient aggregations of functionality. These
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:16 AM
> To:
> Subject: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?
>
>
> I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
>> modules from the
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
>> I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
>> modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done
>> with
>> things I want to do before cutting the R1.
bject: Branching for Release 1.3 was: Re: Release 1.3?
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done
with
things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning on doing
th
Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:13 PM
To:
Subject: Re: XQuery sample JAXB issue
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am seeing this too, but when i run from my eclipse IDE the test seems
to
be passing.
On 6/13/08, ant e
Here is the link,
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-started-with-tuscany.html
I found it at
Apache Tuscany > Home > SCA Overview > SCA Java
Also you can find here,
Apache Tuscany > Home > SCA Overview > SCA Java > Java SCA Documentation Menu
cheers
charuka
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with
things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning on doing
this first thing tomorrow morning UK time. Can you let
I'm looking into a JSR-250 issue, but changes should be minimal and localized.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
> modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much do
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with
things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning on doing
this first thing tomorrow morning UK time. Can you let me know if there ar
ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all
out and a
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi Luciano
I'd like to keep a pretty close watch on how we change the branch this time
so I would like all changes to be backed up with a JIRA even for
committers. As for what changes we allow. I think we'll assume we are
functionally complete when we cut the branch and conce
I think this is one of those discussions where there is no 'right'
answer. I wonder if we can start with an initial, fairly crude,
approach and refine it as we learn from experience. I like to have
faith in folks doing the right thing until they demonstrate otherwise,
so having version ranges of
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:51 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:42 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL P
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>
>>
>> So just to be clear on what is being suggested this would be like the
>> launcher we used to have back in M2 days right?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>>
> No, the M2 launcher mixed too many differen
Well Mike, you broke a working test! :-)
I tried your suggestion and initializing the property via the
component type file does not seem to work. I opened T-2390.
--Kevin
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Mike Edwards
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raymond Feng wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just make t
Scott,
You are right. Adding @SOAPBinding annotation lead to further problems with
wsdl generation.
++Vamsi
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Scott Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vamsi,
>
> It looks like all your failure cases require runtime Java2WSDL. In order
> to generate a doc-lit-unw
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:42 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andreas
> > >
> > > I was wondering whether the
ant elder wrote:
So just to be clear on what is being suggested this would be like the
launcher we used to have back in M2 days right?
...ant
No, the M2 launcher mixed too many different aspects:
a) load the Tuscany JARs
b) download then from the network as necessary
b) launch your applic
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:42 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andreas
> >
> > I was wondering whether there is somewhere a specification or
> documentation
> > that gives a clear overview of what ty
Vamsi,
It looks like all your failure cases require runtime Java2WSDL. In order
to generate a doc-lit-unwrapped WSDL from Java,
the Java should contain annotation:
@SOAPBinding(parameterStyle = SOAPBinding.ParameterStyle.BARE)
I believe this the new rewrite of the Java2WSDL code that Simon Nas
That would be great! Thanks Ant.
Paul
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:42 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andreas
>>
>> I was wondering whether there is somewhere a specification or documentation
>> that gi
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andreas
>
> I was wondering whether there is somewhere a specification or documentation
> that gives a clear overview of what types of messages Synapse's JMS
> transport is supposed to accept and how it should proc
On 6/13/08, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are the OSGI "real" versions required to be numeric, which would also mean
> 1.x wouldn't work so well as a version for OSGi right?
Yes, the versions need to be numeric, 1.x wont work.
...ant
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Rajini Sivar
Are the OSGI "real" versions required to be numeric, which would also mean
1.x wouldn't work so well as a version for OSGi right?
...ant
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ant,
>
> I am not sure how relevant this is, but in the context of versioning
Ant,
I am not sure how relevant this is, but in the context of versioning Tuscany
for OSGi, Tuscany modules are being built as OSGi bundles with "real"
versions (eg. the current build uses "2.0"). The version used is not
currently derived from the maven version, instead it is specified
independent
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:48 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Luciano Resende wrote:
> > >>
> > >> How about 1.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Luciano Resende wrote:
> >>
> >> How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have
> >> couple releases without
Ramkumar R wrote:
For creating an itests for the validation messages, it was a requirement to
create a subset of tuscany runtime to read contribution metadata, analyze
and resolve contribution dependencies. To achieve this i just took the code
from sample-domain-management to create a CustomDomai
Simon Laws wrote:
...
I still see the implementation-node-xml directory structure. No files in it
though. Was the intention to remove this completely?
Yes, Thanks I hadn't noticed. I removed the empty directories earlier today.
--
Jean-Sebastien
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
Hi,
i've a proposal for current svn. We could make most of our effort to
make the svn compile.
I suggest to trying a fresh build before committing meaniful things
and after committing.
It's matter of 20 minutes but it saves us more times. If doens't
compile, you might fix or
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I see Vamsi uses the following strategy to disable failing unit test cases.
@Test
@Ignore("TUSCANY-") // Ignore the test case due to JIRA TUSCANY-
public void testMySrtuff() {
}
I think it's a very good practice we should follow to maintain a clean
build while
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just make the protected field injectable. :-)
Thanks,
Raymond
Folks,
Unless I've got the wrong end of the stick, you should be able to derive a test to check that the
property declaration from the componentType file IS being used, by setting a default value for the
Hi,
I just make the protected field injectable. :-)
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Scott Kurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:08 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2383) Cannot define component
propert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 to cut 1.3 branch.
> >
> > Raymond
> >
> > --
> > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM
> > To: ; <[EMAIL
t;
> Raymond
>
> --
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM
> To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Release 1.3?
>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
&g
d or setter.
>
> See TUSCANY-2289 too.
>
> I just fixed it by not checking if the field is public.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> --
> From: "Kevin Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1
CANY-2289 too.
I just fixed it by not checking if the field is public.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Kevin Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 10:38 AM
To: "Raymond Feng (JIRA)"
Subject: Re: [jira] Co
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am seeing this too, but when i run from my eclipse IDE the test seems to
> be passing.
>
> On 6/13/08, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I get this too, and can't figure it out either. Doesn't seem at all
> > int
I am seeing this too, but when i run from my eclipse IDE the test seems to
be passing.
On 6/13/08, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I get this too, and can't figure it out either. Doesn't seem at all
> intermittent for me.
>
> ...ant
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm down to my last problem with the 2347 patch I'm trying to apply and
> it's
> a real good one. If feels awfully familiar. But I can't for the life of me
> work out how a patch which makes changes to do with validation erro
ant elder wrote:
Timely post of a presentation on server side OSGi:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/colyer-server-side-osgi
That was a good presentation. Content excellent. Delivery method, very
good. My only nitpick was the lack of a topic/table of contents to jump
around the video.
--
I may not fully understand your comment but it seems inconsistent to
support the provision of component type information via a type file
for service and reference elements but not for property elements.
In the test I have only removed the @Property annotation from the java
implementation and repla
>From another angle, does any spec disallow us from viewing all public
setters on a Java impl as properties?
It does say an @Property denotes a property but seems to allow that the
converse isn't true.
So, while creating a rule that such a property with a setter but no
@Property must be listed in
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>>>
>>> Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
>
> There are a few patterns we use to det
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
>
>> i've a proposal for current svn. We could make most of our effort to
>> make the svn compile.
>> I suggest to trying a fresh build before committing meaniful things
>> and after committing.
>> It's m
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if some of this debate is due to us not all talking about they same
thing so maybe it would help to go back to this proposal:
Here's what I'd like to see as a user:
- a short list of A
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
i've a proposal for current svn. We could make most of our effort to
make the svn compile.
I suggest to trying a fresh build before committing meaniful things
and after committing.
It's matter of 20 minutes but it saves us more times. If doens't
compile, you might fix or disa
+1 to cut 1.3 branch.
Raymond
--
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM
To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Release 1.3?
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECT
ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
There are a few patterns we use to determine if a maven module is
required. Let's take the contribution stuff as an example.
1) contribution conta
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I see Vamsi uses the following strategy to disable failing unit test
cases.
@Test
@Ignore("TUSCANY-") // Ignore the test case due to JIRA TUSCANY-
public void testMySrtuff() {
}
+1 Very good practice.
It docume
On 6/12/08, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am very pleased to see this discussion happening. My thoughts below.
>
> Simon
>
> Rajini Sivaram wrote:
>
>> On 6/12/08, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rajini, I think your summary on the wiki is great. I have a couple
d?
> > >>>
> > >>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next
> week
> > >>> ready to cut a branch.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thoughts?
> > >>>
> > >>> Simon
> > >>>
tnx simon as usual. Now it works.
Ciao,
Giorgio.
---
"Venceremos adelante, o victoria o muerte!"
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
>> Raymond Feng wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There are a few patterns we use to determine if a maven module is
>>> required. Let's take the contribution stuff as an example.
>>>
>>> 1) contributi
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Simon Laws wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to apply the patches on TUSCANY-2347 so these issues here may
>>> be
>>> caused by these changes however...
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if some of this debate is due to us not all talking about they same
thing so maybe it would help to go back to this proposal:
Here's what I'd like to see as a user:
>
> - a short list of API JARs that I c
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
Axis2 1.4
I am very pleased to see this discussion happening. My thoughts below.
Simon
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
On 6/12/08, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rajini, I think your summary on the wiki is great. I have a couple
of comments:
1. I believe SpringSource try to create sensible v
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to apply the patches on TUSCANY-2347 so these issues here may
>> be
>> caused by these changes however
>>
>> The first problem I see is that I get a NPE in samples/helloworld-bpel.
>>
>>
I can confirm that the test works ok now for me.
...ant
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Nash wrote:
>
>> Raymond Feng wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Do any of you see this failure too?
>>>
>>> Yes, I see it. It appears the test is wrong, and this i
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:22 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
20 minutes! what sort of super machine do you have, its approaching an hour
on my machine!
I do agree with the principal though. I think one of the problems is its
just getting so big we try to take short
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm trying to apply the patches on TUSCANY-2347 so these issues here may be
caused by these changes however
The first problem I see is that I get a NPE in samples/helloworld-bpel.
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.bp
Simon Nash wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Do any of you see this failure too?
Yes, I see it. It appears the test is wrong, and this is now showing
up because of my recent check-in r666738 in which I fixed a problem
where the conversation object was incorrectly being returned as null
even tho
Graham Charters wrote:
+1 from me also. We shouldn't confuse modularity purely with
versioning or whether something can be used on its own. It's also
about being able to make different combinations of modules to fit
different deployment profiles.
I agree with that, and this should be consider
1 - 100 of 17240 matches
Mail list logo
