Re: [Tutor] Set Reply-To field to Tutor@python.org

2013-04-09 Thread DoanVietTrungAtGmail
FWIW, I'd like to reverse my answer, and now I agree with Oscar's 29 Jan suggestion to make "Reply-to-tutor-list" the default. Lately, several times a tutor had to forward to the list an email meant for the list but sent to him only, by mistake. On the other hand, the wrote-to-1-person-but-mistake

Re: [Tutor] Set Reply-To field to Tutor@python.org

2013-01-29 Thread Nick W
My personal opinion (with whatever limited weight that has on this list since I've only answered a few questions - and probably half of them I've accidentally only sent to the op)/how I read it is that RFC 2822 actually allows lists to set reply-to header; by my view the list software is forwarding

Re: [Tutor] Set Reply-To field to Tutor@python.org

2013-01-29 Thread Albert-Jan Roskam
> > To summarize existing opinions on this matter: > > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.html > > You might want to familiarize yourself with existing literature on the > matter before starting a new flame war. Hmmm... False alarm?   Page blocked  The page you've been trying to a

Re: [Tutor] Set Reply-To field to Tutor@python.org

2013-01-29 Thread Kushal Kumaran
Oscar Benjamin writes: > I have both sent and received messages on this list that went off-list > by mistake. It's an easy mistake to make that you use reply instead of > reply-all and then the message goes just to one person instead of the > whole list. > > This problem is not unique to the pyth

Re: [Tutor] Set Reply-To field to Tutor@python.org

2013-01-29 Thread Jonatán Guadamuz
El 29/01/2013, a las 04:14 a.m., Oscar Benjamin escribió: > I see the mailing list as being fundamentally a public message forum > and only very occasionally send an off-list message. > Often this means that the archives are incomplete, so that there is a > thread but the part of the thread wher

Re: [Tutor] Set Reply-To field to Tutor@python.org

2013-01-29 Thread DoanVietTrungAtGmail
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Oscar Benjamin wrote: > If you don't mind my asking, do you send many off-list messages as > replies to on-list ones? > Oscar > For this list, I have sent 1 public reply and 2 private replies (to thank individual tutors). Both numbers are too small to have any sig

Re: [Tutor] Set Reply-To field to Tutor@python.org

2013-01-29 Thread Oscar Benjamin
On 29 January 2013 03:35, DoanVietTrungAtGmail wrote: > As a student user of this list, I prefer leaving the Reply-To field > unchanged. I like the fact that this means a deliberate decision is > required to send public emails. If you don't mind my asking, do you send many off-list messages as r

Re: [Tutor] Set Reply-To field to Tutor@python.org

2013-01-28 Thread DoanVietTrungAtGmail
As a student user of this list, I prefer leaving the Reply-To field unchanged. I like the fact that this means a deliberate decision is required to send public emails. Trung On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On 29/01/13 09:04, Oscar Benjamin wrote: > > One particular l

Re: [Tutor] Set Reply-To field to Tutor@python.org

2013-01-28 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On 29/01/13 09:04, Oscar Benjamin wrote: One particular list that I receive has recently made an administrative change so that, from now on, all emails have the "Reply-To" header set to the list address. This means that the default behaviour when replying to a message is that the reply goes to t