On 5/4/19 8:35 AM, nathan tech wrote:
> It has to be said, after extensive research, and responses here, it
> seems python was just not designed to be a commercial product.
>
> Licenses are all well and good, but if you're hacking a product, you're
> just not going to be stopped by a lisence.
>
Hello everyone,
Again, thank you for your replies.
I've always done free products up to the one I am developing now, and,
having considered the things you guys have said, will continue to do so.
Part of it is a confidence thing, I really don't think my products are
worth 7, let alone 700 bucks
On 04/05/2019 15:35, nathan tech wrote:
> It has to be said, after extensive research, and responses here, it
> seems python was just not designed to be a commercial product.
That depends. Python wasn't designed to be a commercial product
in that it is an open source programming language and inte
It has to be said, after extensive research, and responses here, it
seems python was just not designed to be a commercial product.
Licenses are all well and good, but if you're hacking a product, you're
just not going to be stopped by a lisence.
Furthering to that, if I ever sold products it wo
On 04/05/2019 00:45, nathan tech wrote:
> There are tools like py2exe and pyinstaller that are able to compile
> your python code into .exe format.
>
> but why bother?
It's easier and more convenient to distribute a single .exe
file than a swathe of individual .py or .pyc files. It also
removes
Hi there,
Hope you like the subject, I was feeling inventive.
my question today concerns compilation.
I hear this a lot from the communities I hang around in, and it is
something I wonder about often.
There are tools like py2exe and pyinstaller that are able to compile
your python code into .
