I'll take your points, but, to me, it just felt exploitative and
unpleasant. She has enough problems that she doesn't need to be flying
cross-country to do a talk show.
--Dave Sikula
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 9:16:28 PM UTC-7, PGage wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Dave Sikula
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Dave Sikula dsik...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'll take your points, but, to me, it just felt exploitative and unpleasant.
She has enough problems that she doesn't need to be flying cross-country to
do a talk show.
Well, nobody NEEDS to do a talk show. I think your
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Dave Sikula dsik...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'll take your points, but, to me, it just felt exploitative and
unpleasant. She has enough problems that she doesn't need to be flying
cross-country to do a talk show.
Well, I agree with that last sentence. If she were
I think she's contractually obligated to promote her film. Also, if
what has been said is true, she's moved to New York primarily. That's
why her rehab is being done in New York State and not California.
On 4/11/13, PGage pga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Dave Sikula
Actually, Barrett resumed writing a watered-down version of his column a
few months ago, after forwarding articles from other sites to former
subscribers proved popular. He makes it available for free, but doesn't
necessarily update it every day, and it has a bit less insider content
since he
I think it varies from show to show. I never watched Will and Grace (if
only because I loathe Megan Mullaly), but it seemed like every week they
had two or three stunt-cast guest stars who were slumming to appear on a
hot sitcom. On the other hand, The Good Wife (which I've only just
started
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:56 AM, K.M. Richards richard...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, Barrett resumed writing a watered-down version of his column a few
months ago, after forwarding articles from other sites to former subscribers
proved popular. He makes it available for free, but doesn't
Alan Zweibel's memories of Roger Ebert, specifically how he reacted to
reading Ebert's iconic review of North
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2013/04/roger-ebert-memories-bad-review-zweibel.html
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Kevin M. drunkbastar...@gmail.com wrote:
Tweet from
I believe it was actually The Good Wife that inspired a conversation about
stuntcasting on a recent Sepinwall/Feinberg podcast that was pretty
interesting. My memory is that the definition that they circled around
that I found myself agreeing with is roughly that it counts as stunt
casting if it
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Kevin M. drunkbastar...@gmail.com wrote:
Tweet from Chaz Ebert:
CHAZ HERE: We are hoping to stream the Memorial Tribute for Roger
Thurs, April 11 at 7 pm CST. See http://rogerebert.com
https://twitter.com/ebertchicago/status/36167375605760
Some nice
Or so he has tweeted:
https://twitter.com/carlreiner/status/322254848231878656
--
Kevin M. (RPCV)
--
--
TV or Not TV The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups TV or Not TV group.
To post to this group, send email to
Even more than the many written tributes this past week, the memorial
reinforced to me how much I didn't know about Mr. Ebert. More to the point, I
quite underestimated the extent of his non-television work.
Kevin is spot on about the production, but I had the impression that the
streaming
Not for the first time, either. I suspect it is promotionally justified by a
new batch of Hot in Cleveland episodes.
The recent vacation has given Craig a bit of an energy boost. He may also
branch out from puppets into marionettes.
David
From: Kevin M.
13 matches
Mail list logo
