On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Jim Ellwanger wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Tom Wolper wrote:
>
> > We have been discussing a la carte cable here for over 10 years and I
> came to that conclusion a long time ago. If you can subscribe to single
> channels, and you want to catch a show tha
On May 9, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Tom Wolper wrote:
> We have been discussing a la carte cable here for over 10 years and I came to
> that conclusion a long time ago. If you can subscribe to single channels, and
> you want to catch a show that airs on AMC on Tuesday nights, what's to stop
> you from
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Mark Jeffries wrote:
>
> Not to mention that if everything's going to the Internet, the programs
> eventually are going to be the brand, not the channels.
>
We have been discussing a la carte cable here for over 10 years and I came
to that conclusion a long time a
On May 9, 2013, at 2:01 PM, Mark Jeffries wrote:
> For example, if you judged Comedy Central by its early programming and if
> there was nothing but a la carte, it wouldn't even made it to "South Park" or
> "The Daily Show" or Colbert.
Well, I would have paid a fair amount of money for "Mystery
Also buried in that: prohibition of TV blackouts from publicly-funded
facilities.
On May 9, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Mark Jeffries wrote:
> What was that about government staying out of free markets?:
>
> http://www.thewrap.com/media/article/mccain-moves-blow-pay-tv-business-90386
>
> Not to mention
What was that about government staying out of free markets?:
http://www.thewrap.com/media/article/mccain-moves-blow-pay-tv-business-90386
Not to mention that if everything's going to the Internet, the programs
eventually are going to be the brand, not the channels. And has anyone
really wonder