TASTES GREAT...LESS FILLING!
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Joe Hass wrote:
> As a cagey veteran...
>
> What tipped me from digest to live feed was my migration from AOL to
> Gmail in 2004. By having a threaded email client, I was able to
> quickly go through multiple messages at a time while ke
As a cagey veteran...
What tipped me from digest to live feed was my migration from AOL to
Gmail in 2004. By having a threaded email client, I was able to
quickly go through multiple messages at a time while keeping my inbox
relatively straight.
As always, YMMV.
--
TV or Not TV The Smartes
I think it's settled then. The best way to read the group, and the
choice that the vast majority of readers make, are individual
messages. The group sometimes moves way too quickly for the digest.
While scrolling through lots of text may be annoying for digest
readers, having a long thread about wh
As of 2000 UTC Aug 1st, 1196 nonbanned users, 149 on digest.
--
BOB
--
TV or Not TV The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fro
Sorry, Jon, I didn't mean that some requoting, in context, isn't
welcomed.
But when reading this group in digest form, having to scroll past
requotes of entire posts, especially when no one has trimmed them at
any point, makes this a chore rather than a pleasurable activity.
And note to Joe Cough
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Jon Delfin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:12 PM, K.M. Richards
> wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Could I go so far as to add that requoting the entirety of a previous
> > post when responding is just as much clutter to my eyes?
>
> But requoting *none* of it sometime
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:12 PM, K.M. Richards wrote:
[snip]
>
> Could I go so far as to add that requoting the entirety of a previous
> post when responding is just as much clutter to my eyes?
But requoting *none* of it sometimes makes for messages that make no
sense whatsoever. To me, at least.
I agree with Kevin on this one.
I receive the group in digest format and I find shorter posts easier
to deal with. A link to an article followed by the poster's comments
on same is much preferable to having the entire article retransmitted
in the form of a long post. (In fact, such cut-and-paste
