The specified discussion with DeWitt:
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread/thread/d001cb08a80f004/
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread/thread/d001cb08a80f004/I
don't think I wan't everybody and their mom cloning the Twitter API at
Why doesn't Twitter just open up their API and patent and then the Twitter
API becomes the standard? We all change less code that way. :-) I like
all these open standards, but it would be so much easier if we could just
use the existing APIs as standards that we've already integrated into all
uh - how are we not opening up our API?
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
Why doesn't Twitter just open up their API and patent and then the Twitter
API becomes the standard? We all change less code that way. :-) I like
all these open standards, but it
Raffi, it is not clear the legalities of duplicating the Twitter API in
other environments. For instance, if I wanted to run users/show_user on
Wordpress.com's API and get data in exactly the same format as Twitter
returns data for that, along with any other method Twitter provides, is that
All, we just posted the results on our blog :
http://blog.superfeedr.com/API/PubSubHubbub/Twitter/feeds/streaming/a-hub-for-twitter/
I'll also sent them to John Kalucki and Ryan Sarver. It's their time
to play :D
On Mar 2, 7:57 am, Julien julien.genest...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew, it's not so
Andrew, it's not so much about making a simpler API, but making it
standard : having the same API to get content from 6A blogs, Tumblr's
blogs, media sites, social networks... is much easier than
implementing one for each service out there.
After a small day of poll, here are some results :
Do
In light of today's announcement, I'm not sure what the benefits of a
middleman would be.
http://blog.twitter.com/2010/03/enabling-rush-of-innovation.html
Can you clarify
a. How much it would cost me to get Twitter data from you via
PubSubHubbub vs. getting the feeds directly from Twitter?
b.
Ed,
On Mar 1, 5:23 pm, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky zzn...@gmail.com wrote:
In light of today's announcement, I'm not sure what the benefits of a
middleman would be.
http://blog.twitter.com/2010/03/enabling-rush-of-innovation.html
Can you clarify
a. How much it would cost me to get Twitter data
I second this too.
On Mar 1, 7:08 pm, Julien julien.genest...@gmail.com wrote:
Ola!
I know this s some kind of recurring topic for this mailing list. I
know all the heat around it, but I think that Twitter's new strategy
concerning their firehose is a good occasion to push them to implement
But how much simpler does it need to be? The streaming API is dead
simple. I implemented what seems to be a full client with delete,
limit and backoff in parts of two working days. Honestly I think it
took me longer to write a working PubSubHubbub subscriber client than
it did a Twitter Streaming
10 matches
Mail list logo
