Now,
Why the ping test cannot ping but CMD can when the ESET smart security
is on?
Am I missing something?
Because it's not the ping functionality that's blocked but the
application that executes the ping? The system ping.exe is not being
blocked by ESET, but your application ping test
These pop-ups are probably coming from the Motigo Webstats Counter
http://web.me.com/thierry.cornelis/Site/Blog/Entries/2009/1/23_Motigo_Webstats_Counters_Generate_Pop-ups.html
Better change to statcounter, completely free of any advertise technique.
Hi,
I just visited www.overbyte.be
At
These pop-ups are probably coming from the Motigo Webstats Counter
http://web.me.com/thierry.cornelis/Site/Blog/Entries/2009/1/23_Motigo_Webstats_Counters_Generate_Pop-ups.html
I have removed Motigo counter. Could you check if you still see the
popup (Strangely, I don't see it from here).
Hi,
What do you think about this verify result?
D:\openssl verify -CAfile TrustedCA.pem -untrusted MyServerCert.pem
MyServerCert.pem
MyServerCert.pem: OK
TrustedCA.pem contains the issuer certs of MyServerCert.pem.
If the TrustedCA.pem file contains the root CA, what happen if you add
Arno Garrels wrote:
RTT wrote:
Hi,
What do you think about this verify result?
D:\openssl verify -CAfile TrustedCA.pem -untrusted MyServerCert.pem
MyServerCert.pem MyServerCert.pem: OK
TrustedCA.pem contains the issuer certs of MyServerCert.pem.
If the TrustedCA.pem file contains
buffer.
And why you don't use only one record, with variant part?
TEmployee = record
FirstName, LastName: string[40];
BirthDate: TDate;
case Salaried: Boolean of
True: (AnnualSalary: Currency);
False: (HourlyWage: Currency);
end;
RTT
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket
as
load it from a file)
RTT
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
There is nothing to stop you using alternative compression libraries, I
have applications using different components each with their own versions
of zlib.
Yes, of course, but why increase final application size, and resources
used, if we can simple add the possibility to not duplicate it,
If we are not going to use compression, or we are handling it in
our own code, why link the zlib library?
You said you are not using the v7 component, so none of this currently
effects your applications. It is not realistic to make the code more
complicated just to satisfy
Hi Angus,
With one bug fix to reset the stream to the start, your code worked fine
thanks.
Don't know if this is really a bug, or if the need to reset it
correspond to a not standard way to deal with streams by the HTTPServer
component.
In order to enhance the AnswerStream
Just to post some enhancements to my early proposed changes.
if not Assigned(FDocStream) then
PutStringInSendBuffer('Content-Length: 0' + #13#10)
else begin
if hoContentEncoding in FServer.Options then
ICS has OverbyteIcsZlibHigh with versions of many of the Zlib functions,
although only ZlibCompressStreamEx, not ZcompressStream2, but they are
probably similar.
Do you have the time to update the V7 server component (from the nightly
SVN zip) to use the existing ICS Zlib units? They are
RFC1738 - Uniform Resource Locators (URL)
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1738.html
RFC1808 - Relative Uniform Resource Locators
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1808.html
Hi, I'm using httpcli to save a webpage html doc and I extract all of
it's image locations to a text file by saving the 'IMG SRC='
Hi RTT,
which Operationgsystem and Pachlevel are you using? Do you
use ICS Version 6 RC1 ? I am using Windows XP with
Service Pack3, tested my Client now on 3 Clients with this config.
I am using ICS Versoin 6 at RC1. I added my client.exe and
server.exe on my server http
Is just with me or something is not working?
Some of my messages/replies simple don't hit the list, and some others
don't show up in the archive.
I also noted other members messages I received today are not show in the
archive too!
RTT
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket
Correct, beside the maximum limit of 65,353 in detail: With TCP Window
Scaling (RFC 1323) you can use values up to two Gigabytes.
I read 1GB
From RFC1323:
Since the max window is 2**S (where S is the scaling shift count) times
at most 2**16 - 1 (the maximum unscaled window), the maximum
not an expert but I think you don't see the memory usage because
data is not cached in the client. Piotr clearly say that if the RCV
client is not accepting data, Winsocks cache it until its internal
buffer is full and only then report can't accept more because client is
too slow consuming it.
RTT
. Of course not only on
Version 6 of
ICS but also on any other Framework or TCP/IP Server listening on localhost.
Tested right now, and in my case it blocks normally at socket.Flush line
since first cycle, no 'Sent # Bytes!' message show, so something is
different at your system.
RTT
It is not that easy!
The code above might work if String maps to an AnsiString,
however fails if String maps to a UnicodeString ( Delpi 2009 ).
This little modification does the job in D2009
uses rtlconsts;
...
procedure TMyUnicodeIniFile.WriteString(const Section, Ident, Value:
Yes, that should work and is the bare minimum required for use
in the demos. Though it cannot handle a possible BOM.
With a little trick and we just need to rewrite the create constructor.
unit UnicodeIniFile;
interface
type
TMyUnicodeIniFile = class(TIniFile)
public
constructor
The D2009 TInitFile already uses the WritePrivateProfileStringW and
GetPrivateProfileStringW versions of the functions, but only work if
the ini file already exists and is Unicode.
Surprise! That works indeed with UTF-16, however if there is a UTF-8
BOM and data I cannot read a
As I wrote in my previous message, this does not work for me.
Whenever Windows finds an UTF-8 BOM it does not return a single byte.
Sorry, I have not understood.
For me, the previous code works fine in Vista and XP.
I change the encode of the ini file using Notepad from UTF16 to UTF8,
and
My fault, now it works. But it won't be the same level of backwards
compatibility that can be achieved with a class derived from TCustomIniFile.
Can you, please, point one possible problem?
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
It appears the OS API code is not reading the 3 UTF8 BOM bytes
correctly if there are only 3 byte before the section name.
That's what I mean, don't rely on the API in this case since all
this stuff is undocumented. Better use a class that handles
file access natively.
The class
Old Delphi saved ini files will open correctly in D2009 compiled demo too.
It is also important that the INI file generated by D2009 compiled
application remains compatible with the same application compiled with older
Delphi as long as it is possible (This is not possible if a value
Arno Garrels wrote:
Back again, it does not work reliable for me, please try the attached INI.
This elist support attachments?! Or my email client made something wrong
or the elist software trashed the attachment.
Please send it directly to my email address
--
To unsubscribe or change
Arno Garrels wrote:
Here's the INI file that does not work with your code for me.
It appears the OS API code is not reading the 3 UTF8 BOM bytes correctly
if there are only 3 byte before the section name. Probably a bug in the
API, or a text files requirement, BOM always terminated by EOL?
If you derive something like the TMemInFile that writes all data in
one call to a method UpdateFile it's possible to add a BOM or not
depending on the data itself. You can read a BOM-marked UTF-8 INI +
file, change it and write it back as Ansi or plain Ascii without BOM
if encoding is no
That's IMO not worth the effort, I was searching for a very simple
solution that took not more than a few minutes to change everything.
What about writing a new TIcsIniFile doing the job ?
Would be enough to searchreplace TIniFile by TIcsIniFile.
TIcsIniFile or TUnicodeIniFile ?
XML can ease the process.
I don't think so. XML is an heavy beast, taking a lot of code and power. I
don't like it for that purpose.
Just one idea to implement the ini sections handling, without the need
to write parsing code.
It's heavy, but to deal with these little ini files will
This is a very simple parse solution, but works.
HeaderList := TStringList.Create;
HeaderList.NameValueSeparator := ':';
HeaderList.Text := YourHeaderString; //must be a string with
header items delimited by carriage return and line feed, as it came in
the
You have to nil the stream object
if Assigned(ClientCnx.DocStream) then
begin
ClientCnx.DocStream.Free;
ClientCnx.DocStream:=nil;
end;
of just
Uses SysUtils;
if Assigned(ClientCnx.DocStream) then
freeandnil(ClientCnx.DocStream)
I tried:
ClientCnx := TMyHttpConnection(Client);
Strange or not the next html form code generate a empty,only header,
POST request.
form method=post action=/SomeAction onsubmit=
input type=submit value=Proceed to next step /
/form
The cause is the onsubmit event.
If in the httpserver onPosteDocument I accept the request the connection
will
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
