Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Bartek,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Are seconds an appropriate scale factor for the timeout?
...
The patch didn't introduce changes in this regard -- TFTP timeouts were
defined in seconds originally. The patch makes the timeout behavior
configurable,
On Wednesday 24 September 2008, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
BTW: I fail to see what's really PPC specific about the pci code in
question. Nobuhiro, could you please elaborate what's the problem here?
I wanted to remove CPU and baords of specific code from from PCI network
driver. CONFIG_E500,
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Yuri Tikhonov wrote:
Is it OK, or should we remove these strings from the Linux driver,
assuming U-Boot has already done this ?
Please go ahead and remove these from the linux driver.
Thanks for confirmation, will do.
I have to admit that I am a little
Hi Wolfgang,
You wrote:
Dear Bartlomiej Sieka,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The auto-update feature allows to automatically download software updates
from a TFTP server and store them in Flash memory during boot. Updates are
contained in a FIT file and protected with SHA-1
Dear Bartek,
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I think auto-update is not a good name (especially since it has a
different meaning than the similar sounding autoload0; also there is
a typo in sofware.
But most of all - do we really need a new environment variable? What's
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Bartek,
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I think auto-update is not a good name (especially since it has a
different meaning than the similar sounding autoload0; also there is
a typo in sofware.
But most of all - do we really need a new environment
Dear Bartlomiej Sieka,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I see. Maybe we should call the variable updatefile or similar,
then?
How about au_file? updatefile suffers from similarity to the
commonly used (although not documented) update env. variable. But I'm
fine either way, just
Hi All,
I am successfully able to get the U-boot prompt on my board based on
IMX27ads.
However I am facing the following issue. Please help me out :
I want to load the Linux Kernel Zimage on to RAM. As per the documentation
we have used the following command to load zImage using Kermit
Lejin K Joy said the following on 09/25/2008 05:06 AM:
I want to load the Linux Kernel Zimage on to RAM. As per the documentation
we have used the following command to load zImage using Kermit protocol.
U-boot-v2 loadb -c zImage
(Also tried U-boot-v2 loadb -f zImage )
Which successfully
Added for convenience for other platforms that uses MPC8360 (has 8 UCC).
6 eth interface is chosen because the platform I am using combines
UCC12 and UCC34 as gigEth and the other 4 UCC as 10/100 Eth.
- Richard
From: Richard Retanubun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:21:47 -0400
-Original Message-
From: Nishanth Menon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 4:33 PM
To: Lejin K Joy
Cc: 'Robert Schwebel'; 'Sascha Hauer'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot]working with loadb bootm on u-boot-v2 for imx27ads
Board
Hello,
the I2C source clock frequency for the MPC8544 is determined in
cpu/mpc85xx/speed.c:
#elif defined(CONFIG_MPC8544)
/*
* On the 8544, the I2C clock is the same as the SEC clock. This can be
* either CCB/2 or CCB/3, depending on the value of cfg_sec_freq. See
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More detailed description can be found in doc/README.au_tftp
'au' as a prefix seems awfully terse and cryptic to me (not to mention
reminding me of Australians and gold), something a bit longer would go
a long way to
-Original Message-
From: Nishanth Menon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:07 PM
To: Lejin K Joy
Cc: Robert Schwebel; Sascha Hauer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] working with loadb bootm on u-boot-v2 for imx27ads
Board
On
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This will not work. Take a look at the lwmon5 configuration. It has a similar
Intel FLASH which has two chips inside:
#define CFG_FLASH0 0xFC00
#define CFG_FLASH1 0xF800
#define
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Roman Mashak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Reading u-boot's README paper and trying to figure out a few aspects:
(1) as I know the bootloader sets up memory area for argument passing,
initializes it with data structures and fill up with the values. Is
this
Hi, Stefan
Stefan Roese wrote:
On Thursday 25 September 2008, Felix Radensky wrote:
I'm running U-Boot 1.3.4 on custom 460EX based board,
equipped with 64M P33 flash (similar to Intel P30). See
http://www.numonyx.com/Documents/Datasheets/314749_P33_Discrete_DS.pdf
This flash is
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:33:30 -0500
Andrew Dyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More detailed description can be found in doc/README.au_tftp
'au' as a prefix seems awfully terse and cryptic to me (not to mention
reminding
Dear Kim,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More detailed description can be found in doc/README.au_tftp
'au' as a prefix seems awfully terse and cryptic to me (not to mention
reminding me of
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:53:24 -0400
richardretanubun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added for convenience for other platforms that uses MPC8360 (has 8 UCC).
6 eth interface is chosen because the platform I am using combines
UCC12 and UCC34 as gigEth and the other 4 UCC as 10/100 Eth.
- Richard
Kim Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:53:24 -0400
richardretanubun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added for convenience for other platforms that uses MPC8360 (has 8 UCC).
6 eth interface is chosen because the platform I am using combines
UCC12 and UCC34 as gigEth and the other 4 UCC as
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:25:20 -0400
richardretanubun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:53:24 -0400
richardretanubun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
..i.e, here.
Understood, thanks for the clarification, will heed for future patches.
excellent,
Added for convenience for other platforms that uses MPC8360 (has eight UCC).
Six eth interface is chosen because the platform I am using combines
UCC12 and UCC34 as two gigEth and the other four UCC as 10/100 Eth.
Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
V2 of this patch adds
Dear Jerry Van Baren,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Kumar solved this problem WRT cpu/mpc83xx/fdt.c fdt_fixup_ethernet(void
*fdt) (and other CPUs) by using the device tree to find all the
ethernets and configure them.
Dear Kim Phillips,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
- Ethernet address:
CONFIG_ETHADDR
+ CONFIG_ETH1ADDR
CONFIG_ETH2ADDR
hmm..historically ETHADDR has been the implicit ETH1ADDR. Did you mean
No. ETHADDR is ETH0ADDR
Best regards,
Wolfgang
Dear richardretanubun,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
+++ b/README
@@ -1097,6 +1097,9 @@ The following options need to be configured:
CONFIG_ETHADDR
CONFIG_ETH2ADDR
CONFIG_ETH3ADDR
+ CONFIG_ETH4ADDR
+
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear richardretanubun,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
+++ b/README
@@ -1097,6 +1097,9 @@ The following options need to be configured:
CONFIG_ETHADDR
CONFIG_ETH2ADDR
CONFIG_ETH3ADDR
+CONFIG_ETH4ADDR
+
Dear richardretanubun,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Please disregard V2. V1 is correct, except for this change:
So you will submit a V3?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5,
Hello,
2008/9/25 Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(2) this question is a consequence of the first.
'struct bd_info' from $(UBOOT)/include/asm-arm/u-boot.h is a structure
holding board's specific information, am I right?
Not really. bd_info is passing boot information ot old (arch/ppc)
Hi,
In u-boot, I only comment the u-boot part only. others are same at mtd
mailing list.
generally looks good to me. except minor ones.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
--- a/common/cmd_onenand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_onenand.c
@@ -20,9 +20,64 @@
extern struct mtd_info onenand_mtd;
extern struct
Hello,
2008/9/25 Andrew Dyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Many (most?) ARM kernel ports use a format called ATAGS to pass
information to the linux kernel at startup.CONFIG_CMDLINE_TAG tells
u-boot to include ATAGS support, there are a variety of tags that can
Oh, I see now. The TAG structures are
OK, critique v2 (thanks to Wolfgang calling BS on my previous critique :-).
richardretanubun wrote:
Added for convenience for other platforms that uses MPC8360 (has 8 UCC).
6 eth interface is chosen because the platform I am using combines
UCC12 and UCC34 as gigEth and the other 4 UCC as
Hello,
is there an U-Boot available for the Marvell Feroceon 88f5181 ?
_
In 5 Schritten zur eigenen Homepage. Jetzt Domain sichern und gestalten!
Nur 3,99 EUR/Monat! http://www.maildomain.web.de/?mc=021114
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Gary Jennejohn,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Without this change DPRAM can be exhausted when CFG_ALLOC_DPRAM is
defined, which eventually leads to a machine check. This change
assures that DPRAM is allocated only once in that case.
Signed-off-by:
Dear Jerry Van Baren,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Here is where a modification Kumar's loop (I would loop over
/aliases/ethernet[N] instead of the env variables) would cut out 5
copies of the same code and would scale infinitely. Hmmm, we have
MAXCONTROLLERS
35 matches
Mail list logo
