Dear Wolfgang Denk
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 11:23 PM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] debug_print macros support
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message
On Apr 05, 2009 01:40 Jean-Christophe Wrote :
Your patch Fix OneNAND ipl to read CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN
brake the appolon
Could you take a look?
- Can you please do let me know , where exactly do you see a problem ?
With Regards
Moorthy
On Monday 06 April 2009 01:32:30 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
If I understood current u-boot debugging properly, the debug statements are
enabled by editing src file by adding #define DEBUG Doing this the
release contents will be tampered,
this may not be relevant from development point of view.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vap...@gentoo.org]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 12:01 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Wolfgang Denk; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] debug_print macros support
On Monday 06 April 2009 01:32:30
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:plagn...@jcrosoft.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 9:41 PM
To: Premi, Sanjeev
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Compiling for ARMv7-a
On 21:27 Thu 02 Apr , Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
Hi,
I am
-Original Message-
From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vap...@gentoo.org]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 7:44 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Macronix MX25xx MTD SPI flash driver
On Friday 03 April 2009 07:49:19 Prafulla
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 11:25 PM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] bin_dep.sh Support
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message
On Monday 06 April 2009 03:23:30 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
+ /* Up to 2 seconds */
+ ret = macronix_wait_ready(flash, 2 * CONFIG_SYS_HZ);
there's a common flash erase timeout define
Block erase time for Micronix are different than specified in
spi_flash_internals.h
Add some corner case fixes for some Blackfin peripheral drivers, and add
some fixes for anomalies and auditing of others. One or two of the audits
aren't strictly fixes (just adding /*...*/ comments(, but it makes my life
easier to keep them together.
Graf Yang (1):
Blackfin: nand: flush
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf527/anomaly.h | 40 ---
include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf533/anomaly.h | 77 +++-
include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf537/anomaly.h | 67 +
From: Todor I Mollov tmol...@ucsd.edu
Blackfin SPI driver was not driving the SPI chip-select high before
putting the chip-select signals into tri-state mode. This is probably
something that slipped by unnoticed in most designs. If the signals are
put directly into a tri-state mode, then the
From: Graf Yang graf.y...@analog.com
We need to make sure the data written to the nand flash controller makes
it there before we start polling its status register. Otherwise, we may
get stale data and return before the controller is actually ready.
Signed-off-by: Graf Yang graf.y...@analog.com
DESCRIPTION:
If the DF bit is set prior to a hardware reset, the PLL will continue to
divide CLKIN by 2 after the hardware reset, but the DF bit itself will be
cleared in the PLL_CTL register.
WORKAROUND:
Reprogram the PLL with DF cleared if the desire is to not divide CLKIN by
2 after reset.
DESCRIPTION:
The Boot ROM is executed at power up/reset and changes the value of the
SICA_IWR registers from their default reset value of 0x, but does not
restore them.
WORKAROUND:
User code should not rely on the default value of these registers. Set
the desired values explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
cpu/blackfin/initcode.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/blackfin/initcode.c b/cpu/blackfin/initcode.c
index 7f54860..062cbb8 100644
--- a/cpu/blackfin/initcode.c
+++ b/cpu/blackfin/initcode.c
@@
DESCRIPTION:
The column address width settings for banks 2 and 3 are misconnected in
the SDRAM controller. Accesses to bank 2 will result in an error if the
Column Address Width for bank 3 (EB3CAW ) is not set to be the same as
that of bank 2.
WORKAROUND:
If using bank 2, make sure that banks 2
There is no code change here, just new comments, but this keeps me from
having to do another audit from scratch in the future.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
cpu/blackfin/serial.c | 21 -
cpu/blackfin/serial.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 21
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message 73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e250840...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com you
wrote:
This seems to be a lot of effort, from code to command line pollution
- for what exactly?
Which is the problem you are trying to solve?
If I understood current u-boot
Dear Premi, Sanjeev,
In message b85a65d85d7eb246be421b3fb0fbb59301cc6fb...@dbde02.ent.ti.com you
wrote:
maybe you could explain us why you need it?
[sp] Only as an exercise to see if compiling for ARM v7 provides any
better performance - speed and/or power-consumption.
...both of
Hi Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 10:24 Fri 27 Mar , Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
This patch adds support for MEESC board from esd gmbh.
The MEESC is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu
---
please
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message 73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e250840...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com you
wrote:
I don't see use cases for this. This should probably remain
out of tree.
Relevant use case will be Marvell Kirkwood SOC, this patch will be dependen
cy for the same
It is
On Monday 06 April 2009 03:56:39 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
This seems to be a lot of effort, from code to command line pollution
- for what exactly?
Which is the problem you are trying to solve?
If I understood current u-boot debugging properly, the
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 1239004434-13962-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
Add some corner case fixes for some Blackfin peripheral drivers, and add
some fixes for anomalies and auditing of others. One or two of the audits
aren't strictly fixes (just adding /*...*/
On Monday 06 April 2009 04:07:18 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message Mike Frysinger wrote:
Add some corner case fixes for some Blackfin peripheral drivers, and add
some fixes for anomalies and auditing of others. One or two of the
audits aren't strictly fixes (just adding /*...*/ comments(,
Hi
I'm not sure we are on the same page here, the Kirkwood has an internal bootROM
which can only boot an image if this image is wrapped by a specific header.
The do_image should take the u-boot bin and wrap it with this header.
How do u suggest we will support this header generation for the
Dear Ronen Shitrit,
In message 309002c0da137042828828fc53d7a9347e13537...@il-mb01.marvell.com you
wrote:
I'm not sure we are on the same page here, the Kirkwood has an
internal bootROM which can only boot an image if this image is
wrapped by a specific header.
What a stupid (read: broken)
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 200904060413.40502.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
I guess a pull request will follow soon?
for patch series, i like to let them sit for a day or two before asking for a
pull request. inevitably, some one points out something i did wrong.
Yes, of course. I
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 1239004434-13962-3-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
From: Graf Yang graf.y...@analog.com
We need to make sure the data written to the nand flash controller makes
it there before we start polling its status register. Otherwise, we may
get stale
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:29 PM
To: Premi, Sanjeev
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Compiling for ARMv7-a
Dear Premi, Sanjeev,
In message
-Original Message-
From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vap...@gentoo.org]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:09 PM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Macronix MX25xx MTD SPI flash driver
On Monday 06 April 2009 03:23:30 Prafulla
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 1239004434-13962-2-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
...
diff --git a/drivers/spi/bfin_spi.c b/drivers/spi/bfin_spi.c
index bc3394a..bc255cc 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/bfin_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/bfin_spi.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ void
Dear Ronen Shitrit,
In message 309002c0da137042828828fc53d7a9347e13537...@il-mb01.marvell.com you
wrote:
I'm not sure we are on the same page here, the Kirkwood has an
internal bootROM which can only boot an image if this image is
wrapped by a specific header.
There are tons of standards
On Monday 06 April 2009 04:27:10 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message Mike Frysinger wrote:
From: Graf Yang graf.y...@analog.com
We need to make sure the data written to the nand flash controller makes
it there before we start polling its status register. Otherwise, we may
get stale data
On Monday 06 April 2009 04:24:39 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message Ronen Shitrit wrote:
I'm not sure we are on the same page here, the Kirkwood has an
internal bootROM which can only boot an image if this image is
wrapped by a specific header.
What a stupid (read: broken) hardware design.
Dear Ronen Shitrit,
In message 309002c0da137042828828fc53d7a9347e13538...@il-mb01.marvell.com you
wrote:
Dear Ronen Shitrit,
In message 309002c0da137042828828fc53d7a9347e13537...@il-mb01.marvell.com=
you wrote:
I'm not sure we are on the same page here, the Kirkwood has an
internal
On Monday 06 April 2009 05:16:02 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
in message Mike wrote:
the Blackfin processor too has a custom format (LDR) for booting code.
it's akin to the PHDRs in ELF, plus some additional flag bits to control
behavior. but in our world, i wrote external utilities to manage
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
[mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 2:46 PM
To: Mike Frysinger
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] bin_dep.sh Support
Dear Mike,
On Monday 06 April 2009 05:38:59 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
As a user ideally I expect u-boot.bin generated by u-boot make
should go onto flash and board should work.
i disagree. u-boot.bin should be the exact flat binary of converting from the
u-boot ELF file using objdump.
But if this
Hi All,
I am trying to boot a RTOS from uboot. I have the uboot flashed in NAND
Flash.
When i power on the board(OMAP3530 based from Mistral) uboot prompt comes
up. Now how do i boot an RTOS which is also residing in NAND Flash at
different offset.?
Can i acheive this without changing the
Dear Jens Scharsig,
In message grchq0$5v...@ger.gmane.org you wrote:
Where is the best place to store this device driver?
1. uboot-root/device/video
2. uboot-root/board/[vendor]/[name for common dir]
drivers/video/
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,
Sorry
Pls ignore this email...
Regards..
Prafulla . .
-Original Message-
From: Prafulla Wadaskar [mailto:prafu...@marvell.com]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:23 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Ronen Shitrit; Prafulla Wadaskar
Subject: [PATCH v2] Macroni ha ha ha ha ha
From:
From: prafulla_wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
Added macronix SF driver for MTD framework
MX25L12805D is supported and tested
TBD: sector erase implementation, other deivces support
Change log:
v2: typos corrected, MX25PXX renamed as MX25XX,
spi_flash struct declared as first member,
RDSR command
On Monday 06 April 2009 06:28:33 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message Mike Frysinger wrote:
...which seems to be an acceptable (to both sides) compromise to me.
minus support for embedding the environment into the image ... i have a
patch that adds an option to tools/envcrc to export the
CONFIG_S3C6400 is must defined at config header file
That definition is unnecessary at this file
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com
---
include/s3c6400.h |4
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/s3c6400.h b/include/s3c6400.h
index
The --binary option to envcrc can be used to export the embedded env as a
binary blob so that it can be manipulated/examined/whatever externally.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
tools/envcrc.c | 45 +
1 files changed, 41
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message 1239033171-26122-1-git-send-email-prafu...@marvell.com you wrote:
From: prafulla_wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
Added macronix SF driver for MTD framework
MX25L12805D is supported and tested
TBD: sector erase implementation, other deivces support
I already expressed my apology for the same..
Once again I am very sorry for the same.
Clearly my intention was not to waste your time. It was an accident
I will take care not to happen such things ahead...
Hope you will understand me
Regards..
Prafulla . .
-Original Message-
From:
On Monday 06 April 2009 11:54:43 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ LIB := $(obj)libspi_flash.a
COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH)+= spi_flash.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_ATMEL) += atmel.o
-Original Message-
From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vap...@gentoo.org]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:35 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Macronix MX25xx MTD SPI flash driver
Change log:
v2: typos corrected,
On Monday 06 April 2009 11:54:43 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
From: prafulla_wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
Added macronix SF driver for MTD framework
MX25L12805D is supported and tested
TBD: sector erase implementation, other deivces support
Change log:
v2: typos corrected, MX25PXX renamed as
-Original Message-
From: Ben Warren [mailto:biggerbadder...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 12:44 AM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Gbe Controller driver support
for kirkwood SOCs
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
From: prafulla_wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
Added macronix SF driver for MTD framework
MX25L12805D is supported and tested
TBD: sector erase implementation, other deivces support
Signed-off-by: prafulla_wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
Reviewed by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
Tested by:
Dear Mike,
in message 200904060503.18864.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
the Blackfin processor too has a custom format (LDR) for booting code. it's
akin to the PHDRs in ELF, plus some additional flag bits to control behavior.
but in our world, i wrote external utilities to manage ELF-LDR
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message 73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e250840...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com you
wrote:
...which seems to be an acceptable (to both sides) compromise to me.
I understood from the discussion so far that-
1. There are several cases where u-boot.bin does not help alone
Hi Mike
I missed subject info (i.e. PATCH v2) is this a problem? Shall I send it again?
Regards..
Prafulla . .
-Original Message-
From: Prafulla Wadaskar [mailto:prafu...@marvell.com]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:25 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Ronen Shitrit; Prafulla
-Original Message-
From: Detlev Zundel [mailto:d...@denx.de]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 3:10 PM
To: Wolfgang Denk
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] bin_dep.sh Support
Hi,
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message
Hello maintainers,
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
currently we have 3 Boards (one already in U-boot Tree), witch use the same
vendor-specific video hardware. This video device is not a classic framebuffer
or console, but supports splashimage and bmp command.
Our Question:
Where is the best place to
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit :
The timer has been rewrote with a precision at ~0,18%
works fine on an 9260 and solves TFTP timeout problem.
Eric
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 200904060533.47911.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
...which seems to be an acceptable (to both sides) compromise to me.
minus support for embedding the environment into the image ... i have a patch
that adds an option to tools/envcrc to export the environment
On Monday 06 April 2009 06:46:29 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
I missed subject info (i.e. PATCH v2) is this a problem? Shall I send it
again?
dont worry about it. the [PATCH ...] contents of the summary are dropped when
merging into git. however, there is one other thing:
Subject: [PATCH]
Hi Wolfgang,
2009/4/5 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de:
Dear Marco,
In message 49d8e8f3.4010...@gmail.com you wrote:
+ for (j = sectoroffset; j sectorcount; ++j) {
i. e. add
if (lseek(fd, j*sectorsize, SEEK_SET) != j*sectorsize) {
error handling goes
Hi,
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message 1238759359-6544-2-git-send-email-prafu...@marvell.com you wrote:
From: prafulla_wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
In some cases the u-boot.bin need to be processed further
to create bootable u-boot binary from boot device
This processing may be cpu,soc
Hi Wolfgang and Ben,
Dear Michal,
In message 4981658c.7070...@monstr.eu you wrote:
I'm really sorry for taking so long getting to this. Mostly little things:
it's ok you are busy guy. I removed uninteresting part of code.
I added all your reported things to u-boot-microblaze.git net
Hi all,
This is my first post here.
I am working with a board having MIPS arch. and i have a strange
requirement wherein i need to initialize about 64MB of RAM with some data.
Currently i am facing problem as my board supports only 64MB RAM and i
need to initialize those memory before
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
if you want to use the dcache you must first correctly setup the MMU and
the TLB
I set-up :
1) pagetable in the SDRAM (one master pagetable, to map all 4096 pages of
address space to map from the virtual to the same
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message 1239033283-26144-1-git-send-email-prafu...@marvell.com you wrote:
Signed-off-by: prafulla_wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
Reviewed by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
Tested by: prafulla_wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
There are a couple of formal issues
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 200904060711.50104.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
since these are trivial and i'm in a good mood, i'll go ahead and fix up the
conflicts and add them to my sf branch. but in the future please make sure
to
integrate these methodologies.
Please don't or undo.
The following changes since commit
712ac6a1a6909a58d6549fb220cc921a7e9f9979:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-usb.git master
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1):
Hello Vivek,
2009/3/10 Vivek Kutal vivek.ku...@azingo.com:
This Patch adds Support for PXA27X UDC.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kutal vivek.ku...@azingo.com
---
Resinding after doing the changes suggested by Kim.
Applied to U-boot usb.
Thanks.
Remy
Hi
+++ b/nand_spl/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+# NAND-SPL files
+/u-boot-spl
+/u-boot-spl-aligned.bin
+/u-boot-spl.bin
+/u-boot-spl.map
+/board/imx31_phycore/nand_boot_mx31.c
+/board/imx31_phycore/*.S
Hmm, can we create a directory for board-specific temporary files to go, so
we don't
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:14:09PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20090331213202.gb19...@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net you wrote:
Is there any particular reason not to change the powerpc get_timer
implementation to use the timebase (scaled down to ms)?
I think
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:24:39AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Ronen Shitrit,
In message 309002c0da137042828828fc53d7a9347e13537...@il-mb01.marvell.com
you wrote:
I'm not sure we are on the same page here, the Kirkwood has an
internal bootROM which can only boot an image if this
Dear Scott,
In message 20090406191242.ga4...@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net you wrote:
Is there any particular reason not to change the powerpc get_timer
implementation to use the timebase (scaled down to ms)?
Side note: we already use the timebase for the implementation of
udelay()
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20090406193049.gb4...@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net you wrote:
There are tons of standards for image formats, and even more commonly
used formats I would not dare to call standard; but this processor
has to invent yet another one?
The same could be said about
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:53:48AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
From: Graf Yang graf.y...@analog.com
We need to make sure the data written to the nand flash controller makes
it there before we start polling its status register. Otherwise, we may
get stale data and return before the
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:44:43PM +0530, rahan...@tataelxsi.co.in wrote:
When i power on the board(OMAP3530 based from Mistral) uboot prompt comes
up. Now how do i boot an RTOS which is also residing in NAND Flash at
different offset.?
Can i acheive this without changing the source code of
On Monday 06 April 2009 14:15:23 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message Mike Frysinger wrote:
since these are trivial and i'm in a good mood, i'll go ahead and fix up
the conflicts and add them to my sf branch. but in the future please
make sure to integrate these methodologies.
Please don't or
On Monday 06 April 2009 15:49:43 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message Scott Wood wrote:
There are tons of standards for image formats, and even more commonly
used formats I would not dare to call standard; but this processor
has to invent yet another one?
The same could be said about
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Ben,
In message 49a4d6bc.3010...@renesas.com Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
Fix the problem that cannot access actual data when CPU data cache enabled.
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda shimoda.yoshih...@renesas.com
---
drivers/net/rtl8169.c | 11 ++-
1
Hello,
I need to access board cpu registers using ppc assembly language. It is
possible to add inline assembly codes in standalone applications?
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/inline-ppc-assembly-on-standalone-applications-tp22922264p22922264.html
Sent from
Hi,
Actually the code is based on Atmel's bootstrap.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote:
On 14:44 Fri 03 Apr , os user wrote:
Hi all,
I want to boot linux by a simplified bootloader. I use Atmel's ARM
chip (AT91SAM9RL64EK board).
Sure, the Code will be GPL based.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear os user,
In message 34f262ce0904022344u6e27ad07g8263785dd36ac...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I want to boot linux by a simplified bootloader. I use Atmel's ARM
chip (AT91SAM9RL64EK
Hi,
The data in NAND chip(linux kernel and RootFS) is the same when
booting linux from U-Boot and from the simple loader. :-(
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:44:03PM +0800, os user wrote:
I want to boot linux by a
Hi,
What is the status of this patch ?
Any comments.
regards
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Manikandan
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 9:10 AM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de; dirk.be...@googlemail.com
Cc: Pillai, Manikandan
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fix for NFS boot for OMAP3 EVM
The
84 matches
Mail list logo
