-Original Message-
From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:35 AM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik;
Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3][repost] nand: Add
Marvell Kirkwood
Hi All,
I am trying to boot Linux from uboot. I have cross compiled Linux and
ramdisk for my board. After cross compilation i did a tftp to download the
image(Linux + Filesystem) to RAM(0x8080) . From there i copied it to
flash(0xad04).
Now on a reset u boot comes up and then when
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
for at91 the GUARD_TIME is 1 and IIRC it's lcd specific
You just contradicted yourself.
The Guard time is the number of empty frames (with control signals
enabled but no data) to wait before starting to send valid data to the
display.
Setting it slightly
On 23:08 Mon 22 Jun , Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:35 AM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik;
Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re:
On 08:53 Tue 23 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
for at91 the GUARD_TIME is 1 and IIRC it's lcd specific
You just contradicted yourself.
at91 boards
The Guard time is the number of empty frames (with control signals
enabled but no data) to wait
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 08:53 Tue 23 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
for at91 the GUARD_TIME is 1 and IIRC it's lcd specific
You just contradicted yourself.
at91 boards
Ok, I see.
The Guard time is the number
Prafulla,
-Original Message-
From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:35 AM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik;
Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3][repost] nand: Add
-Original Message-
From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:23 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Scott Wood; Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot]
Am Dienstag 23 Juni 2009 10:01:28 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar:
-Original Message-
From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:23 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Scott Wood; Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; Ashish Karkare;
Hi Alessio,
a few general comments to your patch:
Please add ppc4xx: at the start of the commit subject and change PATCH to
[PATCH]. The line should look like this:
[PATCH] ppc4xx: Fixed PPC4xx debug compilation error in uic.c
I really suggest that you use the git tools to create and send
I2C lowest priority (as per need)
Can I do something to push I2C priority?
If the I/O is shared with gpio you can use bitbanging with few hours
Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
On Monday 22 June 2009 14:30:42 Felix Radensky wrote:
This patch fixes 2 problems with FDT EBC mappings on Canyonlands.
First, NAND EBC mapping was missing, making Linux NAND driver
unusable on this board. Second, NOR remapping code assumed that
NOR is always on CS0, however when booting from
On 09:21 Tue 23 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 08:53 Tue 23 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
for at91 the GUARD_TIME is 1 and IIRC it's lcd specific
You just contradicted yourself.
Am Dienstag 23 Juni 2009 10:35:31 schrieb Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD:
I2C lowest priority (as per need)
Can I do something to push I2C priority?
If the I/O is shared with gpio you can use bitbanging with few hours
I think this would be the best to start - due to the fact that I
Hi Robert,
Can anybody help me? I'm working on this for a few days...
I'm working on a custom developed board, with Au1200, and I'd like to
use the U-Boot as bootloader. I ported the U-Boot to my board, made a
Linux kernel image, and a ramdisk image.
To try out the configuration, I burn
Hi Giulio,
RGB555 is a wiring with blue and red swapped, nothing more.
Maybe I've made too much confusion before.
And in the at91 eks there's nothing to change, because they're wired as
BGR555.
Ok, in this case, postpone your patch until a board is in mainline which
needs this support ;)
Hi All,
I am trying to boot Linux from uboot. I have cross compiled Linux and
ramdisk for my board. After cross compilation i did a tftp to download
the image(Linux + Filesystem) to RAM(0x8080) . From there i copied
it to flash(0xad04).
Now on a reset u boot comes up and then when
On the boards at91sam9260ek, at91sam9263ek and afed9260, the rstc register was
set to 0 after being set to 500 ms for the PHY reset.
Now if back up is enable it will be set to the saved value.
Signed-off-by: Sedji Gaouaou sedji.gaou...@atmel.com
---
board/afeb9260/afeb9260.c |
Hi Robert.
I set the bootargs variable to: root=\dev\ram (I used: set bootargs
root=/dev/ram)
But when I'm trying to start the Linux with the
bootm 8100 81C0
the Linux can't find the ramdisk. It write out:
Initrd not found or empty - disabling initrd
Do you see U-Boot
Hi Detlev,
Thanks for the answer!
Hi Robert,
root=/dev/ram is definitely correct. It was MS-DOS a while ago, which
switched the '/'s to '\'s on stealing the hierarchical file system
concept from Unix ;)
Sorry! Yes I used '/'. I just missed it.
This is highly specific to the
This patch adds support for esd gmbh MEESC board.
The MEESC is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu
---
Jean-Christophe: This patch requires an up-to-date mach-types.h,
please sync it.
MAINTAINERS |4 +
MAKEALL
-Original Message-
From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:18 PM
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Scott Wood;
Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot]
Hi Matthew,
Hi Robert.
Do you see U-Boot detecting and loading the ram disk image once you invoke
your
bootm command above? eg:
## Loading RAMDisk Image at 0050 ...
Image Name: uboot ext2 ramdisk rootfs
Created: 2009-06-15 14:39:13 UTC
Image Type: M68K Linux
Dear all,
Looking at the several udelay implementations for several different
architectures (an example is cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/timer.c), it seemed to me
that udelay implementations ( and other timer functions ) does not handle
timestamp overflow. This might cause unexpected timer problems.
By
Am Dienstag 23 Juni 2009 12:38:05 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar:
-Original Message-
From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:18 PM
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Scott Wood;
Ashish Karkare;
-Original Message-
From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:53 PM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; u-boot@lists.denx.de;
Scott Wood; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: [U-Boot]
Dear all,
I see that do_bootelf method is located at cmd_elf.c and this file also
includes do_bootvx method. Why is bootelf command is associated with
vxWorks?
Regards,
Cem
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 13:23:18 Dieter Kiermaier wrote:
I think this would be the best to start - due to the fact
that I need bitbanging for FPGA flashing, too.
This is a good Idea, start your development with accessing GPIO registers
directly
I start working on gpio stuff now and
Am Dienstag 23 Juni 2009 14:06:46 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar:
-Original Message-
From: Dieter Kiermaier [mailto:dk-arm-li...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 4:53 PM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; u-boot@lists.denx.de;
Scott Wood; Ashish Karkare;
On 2009-06-23, at 01:01, Peter Tyser wrote:
This cleans up the Makefile a bit and simplifies future changes
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com
---
These are some similar changes to the ones I made to the tools
directory recently. It gets rid of symlinking source files which
I have created a patch for the OMAP3EVM u-boot to create an image for
download into OMAP internal RAM (64k). This allows a complete boot to
Linux over USB only, without any RS-232 serial cables. The difference
between this and Nishanth Menon's procedures (found here:
On 12:46 Tue 23 Jun , Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
On the boards at91sam9260ek, at91sam9263ek and afed9260, the rstc register was
set to 0 after being set to 500 ms for the PHY reset.
Now if back up is enable it will be set to the saved value.
Signed-off-by: Sedji Gaouaou sedji.gaou...@atmel.com
This is arch specific in U-Boot but I'd also check that your MIPS kernel has
support for a) correctly parsing the U-Boot environment provided to it and b)
providing the required data to other parts of the kernel for utilisation of
the
ram disk, eg initrd_start / initrd_end as an example.
This patch adds support for A320 development board from Faraday. This board
uses FA526 processor by default and has 512kB and 32MB NOR flash, 64M RAM.
FA526 is an ARMv4 processor and uses the ARM920T source in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang ratb...@faraday-tech.com
---
Index: Makefile
This patch adds an FTRTC010 driver for Faraday A320 evaluation board.
Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang ratb...@faraday-tech.com
---
Index: drivers/rtc/Makefile
===
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/ctd/u-boot-2009.06/drivers/rtc/Makefile,v
This patch adds an FTMAC100 ethernet driver for Faraday A320 evaluation board.
Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang ratb...@faraday-tech.com
---
Index: drivers/net/Makefile
===
RCS file:
Features supported:
1. usb-phy init support (tested on sheevaplug)
This support is required to bring up USB interface
at kernel level on Kirkwood platforms
Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
---
drivers/usb/host/Makefile|1 +
drivers/usb/host/ehci-kirkwood.c
Hi Jean, or someone who understands U-Boot's build system well,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
at the first run of make we generate the autoconf.mk and autoconf.mk.dep
if not already the case and we currently include only to .dep
in order to use these autogenerated value we need to
Hi all,
I'm successful in provide a preliminary support to EHCI USB Freescale
controller integrated on ADS5121 platform.
I'm preparing a patch to submit to u-boot mailing list.
Regards,
Francesco.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Michael Trimarchi [mailto:trimar...@gandalf.sssup.it]
Inviato:
I'm still thinking how to fix this issue.
The problem here is, deferred expansion on PLATFORM_LDFLAGS doesn't work
expectedly. In this case,
| autoconf.mk
| ---
| CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN=y
|
| mips_config.mk
| --
|
| ifneq (,$(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))
|
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
Hi,
I'll add a mandatory condition
this code MUST be test on omap2 too
I have made a mistake on MAKEALL testing.
I will have to resubmit this patchset when the issues are resolved.
I will arrange to have this tested on an omap2
Tom
The current defition for CKEN_B register bits is nonsense. Adding 32 to
the shifted value is equal to '| (1 5)', and this bit is marked
'reserved' in the PXA docs.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack dan...@caiaq.de
---
include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6
This clock is needed for systems using the USB2 device unit or the 2d
graphics accelerator.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack dan...@caiaq.de
---
include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
| ifneq (,$(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))
| PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine |...
| else
| PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine |...
| endif
|
| PLATFORM_LDFLAGS += -EL
does work.
???
you compile it as big endian to link
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
These type names (and the 'const') are in the existing s3c24x0 code so I
just made my new code follow the same style and Lindent and checkpatch
didn't complain. The u-boot coding style guidelines say we should use the
Linux coding style and this
Hello Richard,
There's only one thing about U-Boot that doesn't seem so good:
U-Boot is GPLv2 (sometimes or later).
To have some parts which are GPLv2 only is unfortunate.
This is due to us many times (re-)using Linux drivers inside U-Boot.
Also this is one of the objections worded on
Hi Shinya,
This variable is not unused anywhere.
Makes my brain twist and after carefully applying boolean equivalence
operations contradicts the title ;)
Cheers
Detlev
--
I have always observed that the pretensions of all people are in
exact inverse ratio to their merits; this is one of
Hi Jean-Christophe,
On 04:12 Mon 08 Jun , Ilya Yanok wrote:
This patch adds support for i.MX27-LITEKIT development board from
LogicPD. This board uses i.MX27 SoC and has 2MB NOR flash, 64MB NAND
flash, FEC ethernet controller integrated into i.MX27.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok
On Saturday 23 May 2009 15:42:36 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
at the first run of make we generate the autoconf.mk and autoconf.mk.dep
if not already the case and we currently include only to .dep
in order to use these autogenerated value we need to include it also evenif
it's
Hi,
I'm trying to completely remove the 2 gigabit ethernets from my U-Boot (as
they are depopulated on my target). I want to use the other 2 ethernet
ports as FSL UEC0 and FSL UEC1.
I've removed the UCC1 and UCC2 entries from the qe_iop_conf_tab in
mpc8360erdk.c and updated the corresponding
On 13:07 Tue 23 Jun , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 23 May 2009 15:42:36 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
at the first run of make we generate the autoconf.mk and autoconf.mk.dep
if not already the case and we currently include only to .dep
in order to use these
-Original Message-
From: Eric Lammerts [mailto:u-b...@lists.lammerts.org]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:59 PM
To: Johan
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ilya Yanok
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] fec_imx27: driver for FEC ethernet
controller on i.MX27
On 06/15/09 10:01, Johan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:56:26PM +0800, wanjiutuan wrote:
In LTIB， first I executed such command “make MPC8313ERDB_NAND_33_config；
make”，
There are some link errors in nand_spl, such as “undefined reference
restgprXXX”, but for u-boot ,there is no problems.
This list is for upstream
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:33:53PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
Also this is one of the objections worded on the mailing list, namely
that such a cooperation will be impossible in the future if U-Boot moves
to GPLv3.
As a base for reasonable discussion, I think we need to evaluate those
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 15:26:35 Scott Wood wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:33:53PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
Apart from the the above reasons, currently most people who voiced their
opinion (not too many right now) oppose the move. The reasoning seems
to be that companies using U-Boot
Hi
2009/6/22 Ulrich Gerster gerst...@dhbw-loerrach.de:
Hello,
I'm trying to boot from my board with a i.MX31 and small page (512Byte) NAND
Flash. I applied the patches in v4 which introduce the CONFIG_PRELOADER
macro. The only example I found where this macro is used is in part 6/6 of
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 08:13:38PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Add WATCHDOG_REFRESH() inside nand write and read
Please send patches inline, not as attachments. Attachments are harder
to feed into git, and in some e-mail clients are harder to quote in
replies.
Also, this should probably go
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:41:03PM +0100, kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
wrote:
The S3C2410 NAND driver source file is included in the makefile instead of
the object file.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfitt kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
---
drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile |2 +-
Hi
2009/6/23 Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:12:48AM +0400, Ilya Yanok wrote:
Driver for NFC NAND controller found on Freescale's MX2 and MX3
processors. Ported from Linux. Tested only with i.MX27 but should
works with other MX2 and MX3 processors too.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:46:50PM +0200, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
On the boards at91sam9260ek, at91sam9263ek and afed9260, the rstc register was
set to 0 after being set to 500 ms for the PHY reset.
Now if back up is enable it will be set to the saved value.
The changelog message is not very
PS
The RX errors generated by switching from the Broadcom Ethernet chips to
the National Ethernet chips are specifically RxBD_CRCERR and RxBD_NO
(defined in uec.h).
These errors are frame CRC error and Non-octet align errors respectively.
Thanks.
Christopher M. Fairfax
Sr. Software Engineer
Hi,
I work on a custom board, MPC8248 based (my reference BSP was MPC8260ADS),
with uboot 1.1.4 and linux 2.6.11, and works perfectly.
We have to pass to linux 2.6.27, and it is just the version from which ppc
and powerpc has been merged, and device tree the unique way to pass
'bdinfo'. The
Olivier DAVID wrote:
I work on a custom board, MPC8248 based (my reference BSP was MPC8260ADS),
with uboot 1.1.4 and linux 2.6.11, and works perfectly.
We have to pass to linux 2.6.27, and it is just the version from which ppc
and powerpc has been merged,
It was merged quite a bit earlier,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:46:54PM +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
Add NAND support for the KwikByte KB9202
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke matth...@kaehlcke.net
--
The git separator is three dashes, not two.
Changes:
- moved driver to drivers/mtd/nand/
- use i/o accessors
- don't
On 15:41 Tue 23 Jun , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 15:26:35 Scott Wood wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:33:53PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
Apart from the the above reasons, currently most people who voiced their
opinion (not too many right now) oppose the move. The
On 00:40 Wed 24 Jun , Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
| ifneq (,$(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))
| PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS+= $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine |...
| else
| PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS+= $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine |...
| endif
|
|
Hello,
I am using ELDK 4.2 and U-Boot 2009.03 on an EP88xC rev1.1 board
(MPC885 cpu) and am trying to get the example apps working (the ones
that come with U-Boot) following instructions on
http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootStandalone#Section_5.12.2.;.
examples/hello_world.bin worked fine:
Hi Ilya,
This is a port of Linux driver for SDHC host controller hardware
found on Freescale's MX2 and MX3 processors. Uses new generic MMC
framework (CONFIG_GENERIC_MMC) and it looks like there are some
problems with a framework (at least on LE cpus). Some of these
problems are addressed in
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:50:29 +0200
André Schwarz andre.schw...@matrix-vision.de wrote:
Hello André,
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1
...
[0001-rebased-mvBLM7-with-minor-fixes.patch text/x-patch (8.2KB)]
please use
Insert-Text File... (Alt-n x)
to insert the patch.
-#define _IO_BASE
Hi, I am in the midst of bringing up a board using the 88E6161 chip
and was looking at your u-boot driver as an example of how to set it
up (still writing simple tests loaded via JTAG, not the full u-boot).
Our board uses the indirect method of writing to the MII bus
registers, and I think there
On 14:04 Mon 22 Jun , Scott Wood wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
no as you add the nand in this patch
the nand need to be add in a seperate patch,
this one need to only add the s3c2440 support
and the nand will be handle by Scott the nand Maintainer
If a NAND patch is
+
+static volatile struct ftrtc010 *rtc = (struct ftrtc010
*)CONFIG_SYS_RTC_BASE;
+
+static void ftrtc_enable (void)
you use it at one please only the reset
+{
+ rtc-cr = cpu_to_le32 (FTRTC010_CR_ENABLE);
so please move this code there
+}
+
+/*
+ * return current time in seconds
+
On 21:35 Tue 23 Jun , Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
This patch adds support for A320 development board from Faraday. This board
uses FA526 processor by default and has 512kB and 32MB NOR flash, 64M RAM.
FA526 is an ARMv4 processor and uses the ARM920T source in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Po-Yu
This patch fixes a debug compilation error for PPC4xx platforms, all
other architectures are not affected by this change. The 'handler'
pointer was undefined. The fix is exercised and has effect only if
DEBUG is defined.
Signed-off-by: Alessio Centazzo acpa...@yahoo.com
---
cpu/ppc4xx/uic.c |
This patch fixes a compilation warning for some Ethernet PHY-less
PPC4xx platforms (440SPE based ones) and a potential compilation
error for 440SP platforms (use of undefined 'ethgroup' variable).
In the original code and in case of 440SPE platforms, 'ethgroup'
is initialized to -1 and never
It fixes the access to the 'ehci' struct elements for mpc83xx which
should have been taken care of in 4ef01010aa4799c759d75e67007fdd3a38c88c8a
Sorry about that.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Mahajan vivek.maha...@freescale.com
---
cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
2009/6/24 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com:
+
+static volatile struct ftrtc010 *rtc = (struct ftrtc010
*)CONFIG_SYS_RTC_BASE;
+
+static void ftrtc_enable (void)
you use it at one please only the reset
Sorry, I don't understand
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
Thank you for your detailed review
2009/6/24 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com:
please use git
I cannot access git in the company, but I will try that at home.
please add a MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry
ok, I will fix them
RCS file:
78 matches
Mail list logo
