Hi Alexei,
(sorry for missing that reply)
Le 20/06/2011 11:30, Alexei Ozhigov a écrit :
> 2011/6/18 Albert ARIBAUD:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le 17/06/2011 10:29, Alexei Ozhigov a écrit :
>>>
>>> 2011/6/17 Prafulla Wadaskar:
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Hands [mailto:p...@hand
>
> > When using nand_write_skip_bad, the aligned offset refers to page (not
> > sector or block), so if as I understand , I can read from the start of
> > page the whole relevant data, then modify only the parts which is
> changed,
>
> That's not the same thing as just filling in the parts you're
On Friday, July 01, 2011 00:36:59 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > so basically you're permanently NAK-ing all my patches even though i'm
> > trying to find a way forward. awesome.
>
> It's awsome how you manage to continue to ignore the documented rules,
> even after I explained
The following changes since commit 2c4ed7d2506621574284ee66da27ce88b7c21a06:
Merge branch 'next' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nios (2011-07-01 09:42:25
+0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash.git master
Alex Waterman (1):
NAND: Add 16bit NAND
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:29:41 -0700
> Ran Shalit wrote:
>
> > I might be missing something...
> > When using nand_write_skip_bad, the aligned offset refers to page (not
> > sector or block), so if as I understand , I can read from the start of
>
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:17:02AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On MPC85xx based NAND_SPL builds we generate a u-boot-nand_spl.lds based
> on output from preprocessor. We where never removed it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
> ---
> Makefile |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deleti
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:29:41 -0700
Ran Shalit wrote:
> I might be missing something...
> When using nand_write_skip_bad, the aligned offset refers to page (not
> sector or block), so if as I understand , I can read from the start of
> page the whole relevant data, then modify only the parts which
For writes, you'll need to do a read-modify-write sequence on the entire
block, after you determine what the proper block is given prior
block-skipping. Or better, don't try to use this simplistic mechanism to
do writes in the middle of a partition -- use something like ubi that was
meant for this
Hi Aneesh,
Le 01/07/2011 13:48, Aneesh V a écrit :
> Dear Andreas,
>
> On Friday 01 July 2011 03:25 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
>> Dear Aneesh,
> [snip ..]
>> But the second part is not clear to me. I saw in your linker, that bss
>> is placed in SDRAM. In start.S the boundaries for clear_bss are
>
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:42:12 -0700
Ran Shalit wrote:
> Thank you for the kind reply. Is it also possible instead of using
> read-modify-write which you've suggested, just to call the
> nand_write_skip_bad (the patch version) with 0x... at the start of
> partition, so that nand_write_skip_bad
>
>
>
> For writes, you'll need to do a read-modify-write sequence on the entire
> block, after you determine what the proper block is given prior
> block-skipping. Or better, don't try to use this simplistic mechanism to
> do writes in the middle of a partition -- use something like ubi that was
> Bill,
>
> On 06/30/2011 04:54 PM, William C. Landolina wrote:
> > I start with Atmel's vanilla first stage boot from NAND. I have a
> > much hacked SDCard boot that works as well and that is where I want to
> > head. My target systems do not have NAND or Dataflash. (I can put
> > NAND on my b
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:38:40 -0700
Ran Shalit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to read\write NAND from unaligned offset & length.
> I saw Scott Wood patch in
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/076435.html for allowing
> unaligned length, but I see that it still demands unaligned o
Hello,
I am trying to read\write NAND from unaligned offset & length.
I saw Scott Wood patch in
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/076435.html for allowing
unaligned length, but I see that it still demands unaligned offset in write,
and also the patch added demand for unaligned offs
Dear Detlev,
In message you wrote:
>
> Just a probably dumb side question, but will ATAGS be deprecated once we
> have the flat device tree also on ARM? As I understand, fdt is certainly
This is our understanding. For DT aware boards, no ATAGS are needed
/used any more.
> the way to go forwar
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
a comment from your side would be nice - in what approach do you see
the best chance for getting it into mainline?
Regards
Simon
2011/7/1 Simon Schwarz :
> Thanks for your feedback Igor!
>
> 2011/7/1 Igor Grinberg :
>> On 07/01/11 12:17, Simon Schwarz wrote:
>>> Ok, topic ATA
Thanks for your feedback Igor!
2011/7/1 Igor Grinberg :
> On 07/01/11 12:17, Simon Schwarz wrote:
>> Ok, topic ATAGS:
>> I see three ways doing ATAGS init for SPL:
>> 1. use bootm.c which means init bd correctly and add a bunch of #ifdef
>> CONFIG_PRELOADER to it - maybe also to some others i don'
mx27_uart_init_pins does the IOMUX setting for UART1 port.
Change the function name to make the UART port number explicit.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx27/generic.c |2 +-
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx27/imx-regs.h |2 +-
board/logicpd/imx27lite/imx27lite
On 07/01/11 12:17, Simon Schwarz wrote:
> Ok, topic ATAGS:
> I see three ways doing ATAGS init for SPL:
> 1. use bootm.c which means init bd correctly and add a bunch of #ifdef
> CONFIG_PRELOADER to it - maybe also to some others i don't have on the
> radar yet.
While this is not clean, it might w
Addition: As I read a bit about FDT it does not replace ATAGS
(http://elinux.org/Device_Trees) - it is more a supplement to it. So
it would not harm to implement minimal ATAGS support and later add the
FDT to it.
I started a prototype for ATAGS creation by modifying bootm.c - which
seems (so long)
Hi Alex,
Le 01/07/2011 14:37, Alex Waterman a écrit :
>
>> Why 'volatile'? Also, there shouldn't be an empty line before it but
>> there should be one after it...
> I used a volatile to prevent the compiler from optimizing out the (normally)
> useless loop. Is there a cleaner way to do this?
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Do you mean the versatile or the vexpress board ? I get the vexpress
> working, but only mapping the RAM to the address 0 and not to the
> correct address (0x6000). This only because qemu maps 64MB starting
> from address 0 as RAM. However, setting t
The grasshopper board is a neat avr32 evaluation kit produced by In-Circuit
GmbH.
See http://www.ic-board.de/product_info.php?info=p75_ICnova-AP7000-Base.html
for detailed information about this device.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann
---
changes since v1:
- use vim: set noet ts=8 for 80 char pe
On 07/01/2011 04:26 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011, stefano babic wrote:
>> I do not know if depends on the compiler (search in the mailing list
>> against problem with gcc 4.5+). I tested with ELDK-4.2, that means gcc
>> 4.2.2.
>
Hi Loïc,
> I tried with arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.5
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Jan Pohanka wrote:
> Hello,
> has anybody u-boot running on i.mx27 litekit from LogicPD, please? I have
> this board with Logic Loader 2.4.9. I'm more familiar with uBoot so I
> wanted to try it on the desk. Compilation from actual master runs without
> any problem
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011, stefano babic wrote:
> I do not know if depends on the compiler (search in the mailing list
> against problem with gcc 4.5+). I tested with ELDK-4.2, that means gcc
> 4.2.2.
I tried with arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.5 and arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.4
and using your qemu-system-arm
On 07/01/2011 04:15 PM, Jan Pohanka wrote:
> Hello,
> has anybody u-boot running on i.mx27 litekit from LogicPD, please?
I have now compiled, no problems at all:
U-Boot 2011.06-00022-gc88d13a (Jul 01 2011 - 16:18:04)
CPU: Freescale i.MX27 at 399 MHz
Board: LogicPD imx27lite
DRAM: 128 MiB
Fl
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Ok, Can you send a commit message for when I merge them or repost a merged
> patch.
powerpc/85xx: remove SERDES4 soft-reset work-around
Some P4080 rev1 errata work-arounds, notably erratum SERDES4, required a
bank soft-reset after the bank was configured and enabled, even tho
Hello,
has anybody u-boot running on i.mx27 litekit from LogicPD, please? I have
this board with Logic Loader 2.4.9. I'm more familiar with uBoot so I
wanted to try it on the desk. Compilation from actual master runs without
any problem, but unfortunately it does not run after loading with lo
Hi Detlev,
> Just a probably dumb side question, but will ATAGS be deprecated once we
> have the flat device tree also on ARM? As I understand, fdt is certainly
> the way to go forward, so maybe we can already start with that? In that
> case, the fdt blob will be another binary blob to be passed
Hi Anton,
> Previously reading zero full sectors (reading the end of one
> sector and the beginning of the next for example) was special
> cased and involved stack allocating a second sector buffer. This
> change uses the same code path for this case as well as when there
> are a non-zero number
Hi Anton,
> Fix all checkpatch violations in the low level Ext2 block
> device reading code. This is done in preparation for cleaning
> up the partial sector access code.
>
> Also replace hard coded function names in printfs with __func__
> macro, and correctly indent comments for style consisten
Hi Simon,
> Ok, topic ATAGS:
> I see three ways doing ATAGS init for SPL:
> 1. use bootm.c which means init bd correctly and add a bunch of #ifdef
> CONFIG_PRELOADER to it - maybe also to some others i don't have on the
> radar yet.
> 2. Have ATAGS config in board config file and init it at compil
Bill,
On 06/30/2011 04:54 PM, William C. Landolina wrote:
> I start with Atmel's vanilla first stage boot from NAND. I have a much
> hacked SDCard boot that works as well and that is where I want to head. My
> target systems do not have NAND or Dataflash. (I can put NAND on my boards
> for
On Jul 1, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Erratum SERDES-8 says that the clocks for bank 3 needs to be enabled if
>> bank 2 is enabled, but this was not being done for SERDES protocols 0xF
>> and 0x10. The bank reset that was being done for erratum SERDES4 (a
>>
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Erratum SERDES-8 says that the clocks for bank 3 needs to be enabled if
> bank 2 is enabled, but this was not being done for SERDES protocols 0xF
> and 0x10. The bank reset that was being done for erratum SERDES4 (a
> left-over work-around that was removed in "powerpc/85xx: rem
>Why 'volatile'? Also, there shouldn't be an empty line before it but there
> should be one after it...
I used a volatile to prevent the compiler from optimizing out the (normally)
useless loop. Is there a cleaner way to do this?
Best regards,
Alex
--
Alex Waterman
Computer Engineer
Phone
Hello.
On 30-06-2011 23:33, Alex Waterman wrote:
> Adds a short busy loop wait to the atmel_usart.c serial_init()
> function.
> Signed-off-by: Alex Waterman
> diff --git a/drivers/serial/atmel_usart.c b/drivers/serial/atmel_usart.c
> index e326b2b..e355706 100644
> --- a/drivers/serial/atmel_us
Am 01.07.2011 13:47, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> Dear Andreas Bießmann,
>> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>>
>> Am 01.07.2011 13:07, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> If I remember correctly, I installed that version not even a year ago.
Well ... git is moving fast ;)
> On another thought, I long wanted to move f
Dear Andreas,
On Friday 01 July 2011 03:25 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> Dear Aneesh,
[snip ..]
> But the second part is not clear to me. I saw in your linker, that bss
> is placed in SDRAM. In start.S the boundaries for clear_bss are
> calculated at compile time to
>
> ---8<---
> _bss_start_ofs:
Dear Andreas Bießmann,
> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>
> Am 01.07.2011 13:07, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
>> Dear Andreas Bießmann,
>>> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>>>
>>> Am 01.07.2011 12:47, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
Am 01.07.2011 12:05, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
>>>
>>>
>>>
git is version 1.5.6.5
>>>
>>>
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
Am 01.07.2011 13:14, schrieb Andreas Bießmann:
> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>
> Am 01.07.2011 13:07, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
>> Dear Andreas Bießmann,
>>> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>>>
>>> Am 01.07.2011 12:47, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
Am 01.07.2011 12:05, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
>>>
Dear Albert Aribaud,
Am 01.07.2011 13:09, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Le 01/07/2011 10:03, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
> Andreas,
>
> Please do not issue a single file encoding conversion, and do not submit
> a conversion patch to UTF before agreement is reached on which encoding
> to use.
I h
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
Am 01.07.2011 13:07, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> Dear Andreas Bießmann,
>> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>>
>> Am 01.07.2011 12:47, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
>>> Am 01.07.2011 12:05, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
>>
>>
>>
>>> git is version 1.5.6.5
>>
>> can you please try a more recent version
Le 01/07/2011 10:03, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann
> CC: albert.u.b...@aribaud.net
> CC: vap...@gentoo.org
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 10 +-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 2bba7b4..fa77fd3
Dear Andreas Bießmann,
> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>
> Am 01.07.2011 12:47, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
>> Am 01.07.2011 12:05, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
>
>
>
>> git is version 1.5.6.5
>
> can you please try a more recent version?
>
> (squeeze is out since February the 6th this year ;)
my time is *ver
Hi all,
Le 01/07/2011 12:55, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
> I do not insist on modified commits, therefore it could be pulled in
> mainline. But for the future, Reinhard please check your environment.
We are right at the beginning of the merge window, so the pull is not
urgent, and I prefer that
Am 01.07.2011 12:59, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Le 01/07/2011 12:05, Reinhard Meyer a écrit :
>
why is in the second block my clear name replaced by email address (as in
the commits in atmel/master) but the mails have correct (UTF8-formattet)
clear name in 'From:'?
>>>
>>> Hmm... S
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
Am 01.07.2011 12:47, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> Am 01.07.2011 12:05, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> git is version 1.5.6.5
can you please try a more recent version?
(squeeze is out since February the 6th this year ;)
regards
Andreas Bießmann
__
Le 01/07/2011 12:05, Reinhard Meyer a écrit :
>>> why is in the second block my clear name replaced by email address (as in
>>> the commits in atmel/master) but the mails have correct (UTF8-formattet)
>>> clear name in 'From:'?
>>
>> Hmm... Sorry for not having noticed this. Apparently, it is al
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
Am 01.07.2011 12:05, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> Dear All,
>> Le 01/07/2011 08:22, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Am 30.06.2011 um 13:16 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Andreas Bießmann (1):
atstk100x: switch to common cfi driver
>
> Patc
Am 01.07.2011 12:05, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
...
>>> why is in the second block my clear name replaced by email address (as in
>>> the commits in atmel/master) but the mails have correct (UTF8-formattet)
>>> clear name in 'From:'?
>>
>> Hmm... Sorry for not having noticed this. Apparently, it i
Dear All,
> Le 01/07/2011 08:22, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Am 30.06.2011 um 13:16 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Andreas Bießmann (1):
>>>atstk100x: switch to common cfi driver
Patchwork says: Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann
Saved mbix file starts like:
>From
Dear Aneesh,
Am 01.07.2011 11:27, schrieb Aneesh V:
> Dear Andreas,
>
> On Thursday 30 June 2011 12:38 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
>> Dear Aneesh V,
>>
>> Am 30.06.2011 um 08:12 schrieb Aneesh V:
>>
>>> Hi Heiko,
>>>
>>> On Thursday 30 June 2011 11:31 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Aneesh,
Dear Andreas,
On Thursday 30 June 2011 12:38 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> Am 30.06.2011 um 08:12 schrieb Aneesh V:
>
>> Hi Heiko,
>>
>> On Thursday 30 June 2011 11:31 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Hello Aneesh,
>>>
>>> Aneesh V wrote:
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
---
Ok, topic ATAGS:
I see three ways doing ATAGS init for SPL:
1. use bootm.c which means init bd correctly and add a bunch of #ifdef
CONFIG_PRELOADER to it - maybe also to some others i don't have on the
radar yet.
2. Have ATAGS config in board config file and init it at compile time
3. Doing it like
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann
CC: albert.u.b...@aribaud.net
CC: vap...@gentoo.org
---
MAINTAINERS | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 2bba7b4..fa77fd3 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Joe D
This is now a series of two cause changing MAINTAINERS give an mismatch of
charsets (ISO-8859-1 vs UTF-8).
There is an discussion about changing charset in files:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/102199
Andreas Bießmann (2):
MAINTAINERS: convert to UTF-8
avr32: add gras
The grasshopper board is a neat avr32 evaluation kit produced by In-Circuit
GmbH.
See http://www.ic-board.de/product_info.php?info=p75_ICnova-AP7000-Base.html
for detailed information about this device.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann
---
changes since v1:
- use vim: set noet ts=8 for 80 char pe
Dear Scott McNutt,
In message <4e0c7bbe.4050...@psyent.com> you wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> The following changes since commit b1af6f532e0d348b153d5c148369229d24af361a:
>Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Prepare v2011.06
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>git://git.denx.de/u-boo
On 06/30/2011 05:24 PM, Matthias Weisser wrote:
> asm-offsets.h should be auto generated. This patch adds two rules to rules.mk
> which makes this possible and removes the rules on imx35.
>
Hi Matthias,
> diff --git a/rules.mk b/rules.mk
> index c2860e5..5fd12a0 100644
> --- a/rules.mk
> +++ b/r
61 matches
Mail list logo
