[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] u-boot breaks for the Overo boards since the following commit: a6b541b09022acb6f7c2754100ae26bd44eed1d9

numbers <= 2410 and not required for the newer boards. For these older boards, u-boot v2014.10 still works fine. Signed-off-by: Arun Bharadwaj --- board/overo/common.c | 14 -- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/overo/common.c b/board/overo/common.c index bdfa5ca..f6f6

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] This separates the SPL-specific code from the u-boot-specific code for the Overo board following the discussion at http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-April/211622.html

The code is split up into spl.c, overo.c and common.c (which has the code common to both) Signed-off-by: Arun Bharadwaj --- board/overo/Makefile | 6 +- board/overo/common.c | 355 +++ board/overo/overo.c | 117 + board/overo

[U-Boot] [v2 PATCH 0/2] omap3-overo: Code cleanup and reduce the size of MLO binary.

This is the v2 of the two-patch series. v1 can be found here: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-April/211651.html The only change in this version is that the earlier version missed printing the board revision, so fixed that. Arun Bharadwaj (2): This separates the SPL-specific code

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] overo: Code cleanup; split into SPL-specific and u-boot-specific code

Yes, I can move get_board_revision into common.c. Then we can retain the earlier printf. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Ash Charles wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Arun Bharadwaj wrote: > > - printf("Board revision: %d\n", get_board_revision()); > It i

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] overo: u-boot breaks for the Overo boards after v2014.10

not proceed. This piece of code is anyway necessary only for really old Overo boards with revision numbers <= 2410 and not required for the newer boards. For these older boards, u-boot v2014.10 still works fine. Signed-off-by: Arun Bharadwaj --- board/overo/spl.c | 14 -- 1 f

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] overo: Code cleanup; split into SPL-specific and u-boot-specific code

This separates the SPL-specific code from the u-boot-specific code for the Overo board following the discussion at http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-April/211622.html The code is split up into spl.c, overo.c and common.c (which has the code common to both) Signed-off-by: Arun Bharadwaj

Re: [U-Boot] Question regarding MLO size

Hi Tom, Thanks for your inputs. I have cleaned up the board/overo/ code like you suggested. I will send a separate email with the patches requesting for review. -Arun On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:12:37PM -0700, Ash Charles wrote: > > On Tue, Apr

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] overo: Code cleanup and reduce the size of MLO binary.

ter the commit a6b541b09022acb6f7c2754100ae26bd44eed1d9 Arun Bharadwaj (2): This separates the SPL-specific code from the u-boot-specific code for the Overo board following the discussion at http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-April/211622.html u-boot breaks for the Ov

[U-Boot] Question regarding MLO size

Hi all, I am using a Gumstix Overo (omap3), running the u-boot v2015.04 and have the following issue: I have made a few modifications to the misc_init_r() routine in the board/overo/overo.c file; the resulting MLO file is 61,220 bytes and the console hangs at "reading u-boot.img" during the boot