ng Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
> An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says
> 'Beam me up, Scotty'.
> __
est regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
> This m
retracted.
Why do you want to take on a bunch of pointless administrative work
that is going to result in losing developers? That time could be spent
productively writing code.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.d
the cable company.
I took the disk out of mine, the information on the disk is encrypted.
Recently the head of the MPAA has been quoted as saying that the only
fair use exemption is to use a video camera to photograph your TV.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
__
ing to rent cable boxes
everywhere for the sole purpose of decoding DRM that I don't want.
> ___
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
. Require
copyright assignment on the new boot loader and then the license can
be easily changed.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
start off with the
GPL v3 initially.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
What is the merge status of this patch? Can we please get it applied
to the 5xxx tree?
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
> Pengutronix.de.
> Created CONFIG_SYS_ATA_CS_ON_TIMER01 define for when IDE
1nd I do known a lot of firms that will stop to use and dev under U-Boot
> if we switch to the v3
>
> so I'm against it
>
> Best Regards,
> J.
> ___
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mai
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
Pengutronix.de.
Created CONFIG_SYS_ATA_CS_ON_TIMER01 define for when IDE CS is on Timer 0/1
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
MAINTAINERS |4
MAKEALL |1
Makefile
I took out the old auto-sizing
code because it didn't work right.
Also, I don't own any hardware with different sized RAM/flash to test with.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
Pengutronix.de.
v5 - Rebased onto u-boot/next. Changed official board name to
phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
MAINTAINERS |4
MAKEALL |1
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
> Pengutronix.de.
> v5 - Rebased onto u-boot/next. Changed official board name to
> phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny.
Does this patch need to go in through a maintainer&#
Is this patch ready for merging? Is there anything else I need to do?
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
> Pengutronix.de.
> Added MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry per last posting.
>
> Signed-of
Is this patch ready for merge?
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
> Pengutronix.de.
> Added MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry per last posting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
>
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
Pengutronix.de.
Added MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry per last posting.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
MAINTAINERS |4
MAKEALL |1
Makefile
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
Pengutronix.de.
Added MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry per last posting.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
MAINTAINERS |4
MAKEALL |1
Makefile
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR 0x10 /* default load address */
>
> This used to be a reasonable choice with Linux 2.4.4; it ain't so any
> more.
What should it be?
--
Jon Smir
KB page size which wastes
a lot of space holding a 2KB environment so I see why some people want
to stick with EEPROM.
So I'd like to keep them both in place. Would it be better if the
FLASH section was a comment?
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
Pengutronix.de.
Added MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry per last posting.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
MAINTAINERS |4
MAKEALL |1
Makefile
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 May 2009 21:53:21 Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> > Why is "speed selection = 10 Mbps" when both sides support 100Mb?
>> > Is uboot decoding thi
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Why is "speed selection = 10 Mbps" when both sides support 100Mb?
> Is uboot decoding this register correctly?
>
> uboot> mii dump 0 0
> 0. (1000) -- PHY control register --
> (8000:) 0.
0 = 1selector = IEEE 802.3
uboot>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> >> - for those who look for a board name, we should support this,
>> >> proba
the choice by
>> selecting first processor architecture (ARM, PowerPC, MIPS, ...),
>> then CPU (family) name, then board names.
>>
>> like this: => Architecture => PPC => MPC83xx => MPC837XERDB
>
> I vote for the second one.
>
> Now I'll ask what the location of "defconfig"s should be?
>
> - k
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910904201712x68658ddfk3c18298deb82b...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> There are a lot of boards that could be moved into a vendor subdirs. I
>> suspect we have
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910904201706u58387d5fod231dd4b8ac88...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> Everyone will know the vendor of their board. You could alphabetize
>
> Really? So who
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In chatting w/Wolfgang on IRC he felt that we should maintain the
>>> highlevel
ists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
The previous code waited 1000us before checking i2c
status. Measurement shows i2c is usually ready in
under 50us. Change the polling interval to 15us,
loop 6,667 times to keep the polling timeout constant
at 100ms.
---
cpu/mpc5xxx/i2c.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(
Make the i2c delays smaller. The measured delay is 55us at
100Khz. Set the delay to 15us which should work for 400Khz.
100Khz will loop four times and get a 60us delay. Try four
times at a 15us delay and then revert to the previous behavior
of 1ms delays.
---
cpu/mpc5xxx/i2c.c |9 +
1
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <20090331010330.20946.41742.st...@localhost> you wrote:
>> Make the i2c delays smaller. The measured delay is 55us at
>> 100Khz. Set the delay to 15us which should work for 400Kh
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910903251212j4436f1afu817456c7f6e9c...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>> Is this patch ok for inclusion?
Ping? Any answer on this one?
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 20
Make the i2c delays smaller. The measured delay is 55us at
100Khz. Set the delay to 15us which should work for 400Khz.
100Khz will loop four times and get a 60us delay. Previous
total delay was 100,000us new total delay is 150,000us before
timeout.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
cpu/mpc5xxx
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Markus Rathgeb
>> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Have you read the BIOSEMU stuff in the mailing list?
>>> Can you adjust the PCI sectio
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Markus Rathgeb
>> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Have you read the BIOSEMU stuff in the mailing list?
>>> Can you adjust the PCI sectio
2009/3/29 Jon Smirl :
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Markus Rathgeb wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I own a phytec's pcm-030 with the shipped baseboard pcm-973.
>> I would like to use a radeon 9200 pci card in the slot on the baseboard.
BTW what you are doing will d
slot.
>
> This means, the interrupt routing map must be much smaller to get a correct
> behaviour.
>
> The current DTS also contains a second slot definition, that was never present
> on this type of baseboard.
>
> ---
will ensure that you have your BARs set, PCI
timings right, etc.
>
> Greats,
> Markus
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
gt;
> Except from that, it looks OK to me.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
*) }
>
> I fully agree that the examples should rather use defaults because as
> the name implies, they are examples after all, not tightly optimized
> special cases.
Providing an example linker script would show us the right way to
write it. I've never written a linker script f
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910903261435x598055f8m74c5ac03ad16b...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> The *.bin format is not smart enough to encode gaps. It just puts in
>> 60KB of zeros.
>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910903261350v21bf16c5l5729927048e0d...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm not sure how you calculate sizes, or how you link your
>> > applications
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910903260647w549a97acv7101ea9347a76...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>> My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
>> function. What's the
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>>
>>>> Libraries appear to be
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
>>
>> On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>
>>> Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
>>> bytes, a
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
>
> On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
>> Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
>> bytes, add a puts("hello world") and it is 65KB.
>>
>> I had expected
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>>
>> My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
>> function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
>>
>> My current u-boot image i
ardware is 7KB. Now it
looks like I will need to incorporate it into the main u-boot image
instead of making it an external command.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Fixed manually and applied. Thanks.
I used stgit to smtp.gmail.com::587 for the initial patch.
I wasn't thinking and used cut/paste to paste the last patch into a reply.
These patches are at git.digispeaker.com if that is easier.
Is this one ok now?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. This code is from
> Pengutronix.de but they
> didn't sign the patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
>
> ---
> Makefile
\n");
> @@ -937,8 +946,6 @@ int mpc5xxx_fec_initialize(bd_t * bis)
> mpc5xxx_fec_set_hwaddr(fec, env_enetaddr);
> }
>
> - mpc5xxx_fec_init_phy(dev, bis);
> -
> return 1;
> }
>
>
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. This code is from
Pengutronix.de but they
didn't sign the patch.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
Makefile| 10 +
board/phytec/pcm030/Makefile| 50
board/phytec/pcm030/config.mk | 42 +++
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>> +/*
>>> + * Returns OPENIP register base address. First thing called in the driver.
>>> + */
>>> +unsigned int board_video_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + ulong dummy;
>>> + dummy
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. This code is from
Pengutronix.de but they
didn't sign the patch.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
Makefile| 10 +
board/phytec/pcm030/Makefile| 50
board/phytec/pcm030/config.mk | 42 +++
rdware and I didn't write this code. I
don't work for Phytec or Pengutronix; I'm just a customer. I needed
some newer features from the current u-boot and I had to port
Pengutronix's release of u-boot 1.2 up to current git head. I want to
get this code included in u-boot so it
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. This code is from
Pengutronix.de but they
didn't sign the patch. I have updated it from u-boot 1.2 to work on u-boot
master. Edited to
reflect feedback received.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
Makefile| 10 +
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >> diff --git a/board/phycore_mpc5200b_tiny/u-boot.lds
> >> b/board/phycore_mpc5200b_tiny/u-boot.lds
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000
0 boards
> use a common script, and I don;t see a specific reason why you would
> need to do different.
How do I make it use the common one?
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Wolgang,
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 09:24:05PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Jon Smirl,
>>
>> In message <9e4733910903211308v63878fabx19f3327371db5...@mail.gmail.com> you
>> wrote:
>>
(®s->msr);
while (timeout-- && !(*status & I2C_IF)) {
- udelay(1000);
+ udelay(15);
*status = mpc_reg_in(®s->msr);
}
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910903220723u31546286q233c9b24b7a5...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> Would it be better to put the check for (gd->have_console) into printf
>> itself?
>
ch a macro definition violates some rules.
>
>> +#define printf(format, arg...) if (gd->have_console) printf(format, ## arg)
>
> There are only a few places in cpu/mpc5xxx/i2c.c where printf() is
> used that we should explicitly code this, there.
Would it be better to put the ch
faster. The measured delay is
55us at 100Khz. Set the delay to 15us which should work for 400Khz. 100Khz
will loop four times and get a 60us delay.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
cpu/mpc5xxx/i2c.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/mpc5xxx/i2c.c b/cpu/m
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910903211339u60f5531cp7a9574f2d1ba2...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> How about this instead? Is there a variable that indicates when the
>> console is safe
ion )
>
How about this instead? Is there a variable that indicates when the
console is safe to use, if so I can adjust the macro.
From: Jon Smirl
On boards which have the environment in eeprom, i2c_init()
is called before the console and ram is initialized. Do
not printf here.
Signed-off-
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jon Smirl,
>
> In message <9e4733910903211308v63878fabx19f3327371db5...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> My guess is getenv() returns a pointer to the environment variable,
>> not a copy o
bserving.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. This code is from
Pengutronix.de but they
didn't sign the patch. I have updated it from u-boot 1.2 to work on u-boot
master.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
Makefile |
Add define for mpc5200 CDM_CLK_ENA
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
include/mpc5xxx.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/mpc5xxx.h b/include/mpc5xxx.h
index 3a32821..6138d45 100644
--- a/include/mpc5xxx.h
+++ b/include/mpc5xxx.h
@@ -140,6 +140,7
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> What's the right way to compile api_examples/demo?
CONFIG_API="y" is in include/autoconf.mk instead of CONFIG_API=y
Getting rid of the quotes lets it compile.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
u-gcc: 0xFFF0: No such file or directory
/opt/OSELAS.Toolchain-1.1.1/powerpc-603e-linux-gnu/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-kernel-2.6.18/lib/gcc/powerpc-603e-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../powerpc-603e-linux-gnu/bin/as:
option '-n' is ambiguous
make: *** [api_examples/demo] Error 2
jonsm...@terra:/home/apps/u-
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>>
>> Six people have various modifications to u-boot hosted on github.
>> These projects aren't linked to each other.
>>
>> I just talked to the github people. To fix this the mai
work
on patches for u-boot.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:08 PM
Subject: [PATCH] MPC5200 FEC MII speed register
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
From: Jon Smirl
Set a non-zero speed in the MII register so that MII commands will work.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
---
drivers/net/mpc5xxx_fec.c | 23 ---
1 files change
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Jon wrote:
> From: Jon Smirl
Who's the maintainer for the mpc5200 core code? It isn't clear from
the MAINTAINERS file.
> Set a non-zero speed in the MII register so that MII commands will work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl
> ---
>
way.
Can you chain two USB-serial converters together? That would let two
USB host systems talk to each other.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
ate_flash_size(). But how is update_flash_size()
going to know the size if it doesn't know where the flash starts?
Don't I need this code that manipulate bootcs to determine the
starting address of the flash?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> I'm porting support fo
er than 32MiB
*/
bank_base[0] = 0x0u - (mb << 20);
return 0;
}
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
d I haven't
stumbled on to the right bits to reenable mii without also enabling
everything else. Can someone familiar with the FEC tell me the right
bits to poke?
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
81 matches
Mail list logo
