[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] km: modify Kconfig file organization for KM boards

Hi Stefan, Yes, it is just an updated version that matches the current mainline. Sorry, I am new to open source contribution, and will take more care next time. Cheers, Pascal Linder Von: Stefan Roese Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Juni 2019 13:36 An: Linder

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] km/spi: port SPI flash of KM Kirkwood boards to driver model

, Pascal Linder Student Telekommunikation Netzwerke und Sicherheit Klasse T-3b Von: Stefan Roese Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2019 08:46:23 An: Linder Pascal; u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Holger Brunck Betreff: Re: [PATCH] km/spi: port SPI flash of KM Kirkwood boards

[U-Boot] Continuous Integration (CI)

Hi everyone, I recently saw the .travis.yml file in the repository and thought a bit more about CI in U-Boot. As I am using GitLab for my own repository, I would be interested in a .gitlab-ci.yml file. Does anybody already have implemented a GitLab CI for U-Boot or how do you guys approach

[U-Boot] Default environment file

Hi everyone, I am currently moving the configurations of the KM boards from header files to Kconfig. But for the customly defined environment variables I did not found a decent solution until I have come across the default environment file, which seems very interesting to me. To this day,

[U-Boot] Kconfig options for several boards

Hi everyone, I would like to turn on configurations for several Keymile boards, which are all using the Kirkwood architecture. Now, I do not want to change every defconfig file one after the other. Until now, we have used a common header file, but with the conversion to Kconfig another method

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot Security

key inside the U-Boot image? Sincerely, Pascal Linder Student Telekommunikation Netzwerke und Sicherheit Klasse T-3b Von: Simon Goldschmidt Gesendet: Samstag, 27. April 2019 21:12:03 An: Linder Pascal Betreff: Re: AW: [U-Boot] U-Boot Security Hello Pascal

[U-Boot] U-Boot Security

Hello everyone, I want to add some supplementary security to my embedded system. The Flattened Image Tree (FIT) to secure the operating system and the device tree, I have already found. Now, I am wondering if I could also secure U-Boot itself before starting it by the Secondary Program Loader

[U-Boot] SPL

Hello everyone, With my NanoPi NEO Plus2 board, I try to make some modifications on the Flattened Image Tree (FIT). This includes compression and also some security features like signing/verifying. But I do not know if my modifications worked out. It is a FIT that is started by the SPL,

[U-Boot] Migration to KConfig

Hello everyone, My task is to migrate a board from a U-Boot of version v2016.01 to the latest state of the mainline. So first of all, I am analyzing the configuration system KConfig that has changed in the meantime. I do not really understand what has changed with KConfig. Is it just the

[U-Boot] Board specific files

Hello everyone, I am new to U-Boot and I am trying to understand what I need to code for using my own board with the bootloader. The device tree files I have already found under ./arch/arm/dts/. Can I just add my device tree under this directory? Also, what is the difference between the