On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:53 AM, Pieter wrote:
> >> static inline void flash_unmap(flash_info_t *info, flash_sect_t sect,
> >>unsigned int offset, void *addr)
> >> {
> >> - unsigned int byte_offset = offset * info->portwidth;
> >> -
> >> - u
On Monday 02 February 2009, Becky Bruce wrote:
> include/flash.h was commented to say that the address in
> flash_info->start was a physical address. However, from u-boot's
> point of view, and looking at most flash code, it makes more
> sense for this to be a virtual address. So I corrected the
On Feb 3, 2009, at 8:48 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:53 AM, Pieter wrote:
>
>>>
>>> static inline void flash_unmap(flash_info_t *info, flash_sect_t
>>> sect,
>>> unsigned int offset, void *addr)
>>> {
>>> - unsigned int byte_offset = offset * info->portwidth;
>>>
On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:53 AM, Pieter wrote:
>>
>> static inline void flash_unmap(flash_info_t *info, flash_sect_t sect,
>> unsigned int offset, void *addr)
>> {
>> -unsigned int byte_offset = offset * info->portwidth;
>> -
>> -unmap_physmem(addr, flash_sector_size(info, sect) -
Becky Bruce wrote:
> include/flash.h was commented to say that the address in
> flash_info->start was a physical address. However, from u-boot's
> point of view, and looking at most flash code, it makes more
> sense for this to be a virtual address. So I corrected the
> comment to indicate that t
include/flash.h was commented to say that the address in
flash_info->start was a physical address. However, from u-boot's
point of view, and looking at most flash code, it makes more
sense for this to be a virtual address. So I corrected the
comment to indicate that this was a virtual address.
T
6 matches
Mail list logo
