On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 19:58 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
>> wrote:
>> > sst26wf flash series block protection implementation
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 19:58 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
> wrote:
> > sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs
> > from other SST series, so add implementation for sst26wf
> > lock/unlock/is_locked
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
wrote:
> sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs
> from other SST series, so add implementation for sst26wf
> lock/unlock/is_locked functions.
Look like all this series add only protection ops,
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Alexey Brodkin
wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 19:13 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
>> wrote:
>> > sst26wf flash series block protection
Hi Jagan,
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 19:13 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
> wrote:
> > sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs
> > from other SST series, so add implementation for sst26wf
> >
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
wrote:
> sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs
> from other SST series, so add implementation for sst26wf
> lock/unlock/is_locked functions.
I've already mentioned about this patch on last
sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs
from other SST series, so add implementation for sst26wf
lock/unlock/is_locked functions.
Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev
---
Changes v1->v2:
* Use generic defines from linux/sizes.h instead of custom
7 matches
Mail list logo