[U-Boot-Users] mDoc H3 on u-boot

Hi, Has anyone worked with MSystems (SanDisk) mDoc H3 in u-boot as a boot device? Will appreciate any kind of help in that matter. Micha - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenge

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/5] AT91CAP9 support : board/ files

On 20:49 Tue 29 Jan , Stelian Pop wrote: > + > + /* Unlock EMAC, 3 0 2 1 sequence */ > +#define MP_BLOCK_3_BASE 0xFDF0 > +#define MP_MAC_KEY0 0x5969cb2a > +#define MP_MAC_KEY1 0xb4a1872e > +#define MP_MAC_KEY2 0x05683fbc > +#define MP_MAC_KEY3 0x3634fba4 > +#define UNLOCK_MAC

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/5] AT91CAP9 support : include/ files

On 20:49 Tue 29 Jan , Stelian Pop wrote: > +#define AT91C_SMC_PS (0x3 << 28) /* Page Size */ > +#define AT91C_SMC_PS_SIZE_FOUR_BYTES(0x0 << 28) > +#define AT91C_SMC_PS_SIZE_EIGHT_BYTES (0x1 << 28) ^ Not needed space Please Remove it

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ARM926: Display Ethernet info in do_bdinfo only if CONFIG_CMD_NET is defined

Hi, Sorry for the late reply. was out of connection from the e-world for some time. At present, in the file u-boot-1.3.1/common/cmd_bdinfo.c, (CONFIG_NIOS2) /* Nios-II */ at line 170 (CONFIG_MICROBLAZE) /* ! PPC, which leaves Microblaze */ at line 197 (CONFIG_M68K) /* M68K */ at line 239 for

[U-Boot-Users] Standalone hello_world, data abort error on ARM926 (AP)

Hi all, I am having problem running the "hello_world" examples that comes with u-boot on ARM926 board. Board: ARM926 (AB) application baseboard Tools: CodeSourcery (arm-none-linux-gnueabi-) I manage to build u-boot successfully as follow 1. make versatileab_config CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none

Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot gitweb has broken links for forked repos

On Wednesday 30 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > if you look at any of the forked repos of the main u-boot repo, the URL > > is> incorrect ... for example, this page: > > http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot/u-boot-blackfin.git;a=su> > > m

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Booting Standalone App?

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I've already read the documents that you have referenced before posting my > first message. I had already gotten hello_world to run in u-boot without > problems (by using the go command), so that is not an issue. Well, that's the documented way to sta

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] make the machid configurable via theenvironment (Was: [PATCH] Changed load address and entrypoint for uImage to ZRELADDR + 6MB)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > I proposed this patch for a long time, but it was rejected by Wolfgang. > > One solution to that problem is to have someone who maintains a separate > tree for uboot which does have the feature in. Then it becomes a matter > of community choice whet

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] ppc4xx: Add initial esd PMC440 board files

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Regardless of previous experiences, just remember to give "git-am -3" a > try once git-am without it fails. Actually I think you should *always* use git-am -3 -i -u --whitespace=strip [OK, the "-u" is default today, but who knows which versi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] make the machid configurable via theenvironment (Was: [PATCH] Changed load address and entrypoint for uImage to ZRELADDR + 6MB)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I proposed this patch for a long time, but it was rejected by Wolfgang. Either you did it differently, or I changed my mind. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Of

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [rfc] new spiflash subsystem

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > You mean the current dataflash implementation uses DMA? Which part of > > the code is this? ... > > Not sure as I do not have a source tree in front of me, > but if I remember correctly, it was in the board specific > "at45.c" which then was split i

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] make the machid configurable via the environment (Was: [PATCH] Changed load address and entry point for uImage to ZRELADDR + 6MB)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > From: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > make the machid configurable via the environment > > If the variable "machid" exists, let do_bootm_linux use that instead of > bd->bi_arch_number. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [U-Boot-Users] NFS Timeout with large files.

Dear Hiroshi Ito, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > U-boot NFS command do not retry to send a command again. > so, when the packet is lost, It will cause timeout. > > with this patch, it should fix. > but this is very old code. so, I don't know, it can applys to current one. We'll m

Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot gitweb has broken links for forked repos

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > if you look at any of the forked repos of the main u-boot repo, the URL is> > incorrect ... for example, this page: > http://www.denx.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot/u-boot-blackfin.git;a=su> mmary > says that the URL to clone is: > git://www.denx.de/g

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] ppc4xx: Add initial esd PMC440 board files

Detlev Zundel wrote: > Hi Stefan, > >> Hi Matthias, >> >> On Friday 28 December 2007, Matthias Fuchs wrote: >>> This patch adds the first files for the new esd PMC440 boards. >>> The next two patches will complete the PMC440 board support. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [U-Boot-Users] build errors on DMA or SPI driver

On Jan 30, 2008 4:30 PM, Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Current DMA or SPI driver breaks MIPS builds. > > example: > $ make gth2_config > $ make CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux- > > leads to ... > > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/skuribay/devel/u-boot.git/drivers/dma' > mips-linux-gcc

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Fix missing code flash size for M5485EVB

From: TsiChungLiew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: James Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Makefile |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 0f6cc59..30fda62 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Make

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 85xx: Add the concept of CFG_CCSRBAR_PHYS

When we go to 36-bit physical addresses we need to keep the concept of the physical CCSRBAR address seperate from the virtual one. For the majority of boards CFG_CCSBAR_PHYS == CFG_CCSRBAR Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This is in the mpc85xx branch of my git tree. - k boar

[U-Boot-Users] build errors on DMA or SPI driver

Current DMA or SPI driver breaks MIPS builds. example: $ make gth2_config $ make CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux- leads to ... make[1]: Entering directory `/home/skuribay/devel/u-boot.git/drivers/dma' mips-linux-gcc -g -Os -D__KERNEL__ -DTEXT_BASE=0x9000 -I/home/skuribay/devel/u-boot.git/inclu

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM[] voiceblue update

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:22:20AM +, Peter Pearse wrote: > I get one warning:- > > cmd_jffs2.c:144:2: warning: #warning "MTDPARTS_DEFAULT not defined!" > > Your patch removed > > #define MTDPARTS_DEFAULT > "mtdparts=omapflash.0:128k(uboot),64k(env),64k(r_env),16256k(data1),-(data2) >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Use #ifdef CONFIG_FSLDMAFEC

Vlad, Thanks. I will apply the patch. Regards, TsiChung - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ __

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Fix 5282 and 5271 interrupt mask bit

From: TsiChungLiew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cpu/mcf52x2/interrupts.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mcf52x2/interrupts.c b/cpu/mcf52x2/interrupts.c index 2ccbde5..9167cec 100644 --- a/cpu/mcf52x2/interr

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [ADS5121] Device tree updates

Changes to match 5121 device tree going mainline in 2.6.25. Change OF_SOC from "soc5121" to plain "soc". Remove unneeded "ref-frequency" fixups. Remove "address" enetaddr fixup. Add bus-frequency fixup for old OF_SOC so old kernels with old device trees will work with new u-boot with 66MHz IPS cl

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [ADS5121] Change IPS freq to 66MHz

Recommended frequency is 66MHz Change divider from 4 to 3. Signed-off-by: John Rigby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/mpc512x.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/mpc512x.h b/include/mpc512x.h index d1c6fb2..b51cf78 100644 --- a/include/mpc512x.h +++

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Booting Standalone App?

Wolfgang, Thank you for your reply. I've already read the documents that you have referenced before posting my first message. I had already gotten hello_world to run in u-boot without problems (by using the go command), so that is not an issue. My original question was - is it possible to boot

[U-Boot-Users] MPC8xx I2C

Hi, I'm trying to rationalize some very common I2C code and came across the following: Every controller except cpu/mpc8xx implements functions like this: --- uchar i2c_reg_read(uchar i2c_addr, uchar reg) { uchar buf; i2c_read(i2c_addr, reg, 1, &buf, 1); return buf; }

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] make the machid configurable via theenvironment (Was: [PATCH] Changed load address and entrypoint for uImage to ZRELADDR + 6MB)

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:33:46AM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > But does U-Boot properly provide machine information to the kernel these > > > days? I have been and still being burned by U-Boot hardcoding the > > > _wrong_ machine ID, and therefore custom built kernels

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch] Disable icache before call the first line of kernel in do_bootelf().

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:12:10PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > unfortunately, using weak symbols and overriding elsewhere doesnt look > > > like it's possible currently due to the way ld searches

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sprintf in standalone

Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 2:56 PM: > Hi! > Having problem with the sprintf function, I did the exporting and > updating > of the files accordantly to the README.standalone. The standalone > application seems to compile without error. But once I do the go > 40004

Re: [U-Boot-Users] errors in using DS1337

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hello, > > the I2C interface is on hostbridge(Tsi109). > > thank you. > I assume you're using the tsi108 driver. Please try applying the following untested patch: diff --git a/drivers/i2c/tsi108_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/tsi108_i2c.c index d6736b0..d337c1f 100644 --- a/drive

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] ppc4xx: Add initial esd PMC440 board files

Hi Detlev, On Wednesday 30 January 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote: > > IIRC, I didn't even try to apply this version of the patch. I tried to > > review it and failed because the patch was "unreadable" for me. > > Hm, then I am not sure what you meant by this passage from your mail: > > > This option y

Re: [U-Boot-Users] errors in using DS1337

hello, the I2C interface is on hostbridge(Tsi109). thank you. - Original Message - From: "Ben Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:48 PM Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] errors in using DS1337 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> hello, >> >>

[U-Boot-Users] [ARM] Available patch: ARM: arm920t: Allow use of 'gd' pointer from IRQ

Harald Your patch ARM: arm920t: Allow use of 'gd' pointer from IRQ is available for test from git://linux-arm.org/u-boot-armdev.git#071219_s3c24_gd Please confirm that the code builds, and runs on the target board(s) Just in case you weren't aware, the gd pointer will not be available in FIQ

[U-Boot-Users] [ARM] Available patch: s3c24xx: Multiple serial port support

Harald Your patch ARM: s3c24xx: Multiple serial port support is available for test from git://linux-arm.org/u-boot-armdev.git#071219_s3c24_serial Please confirm that the code builds, and runs on the target board(s) Regards Peter ---

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] make the machid configurable via theenvironment (Was: [PATCH] Changed load address and entrypoint for uImage to ZRELADDR + 6MB)

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > But does U-Boot properly provide machine information to the kernel these > > > days? I have been and still being burned by U-Boot hardcoding the > > > _wrong_ machine ID, and therefore custom built kernels from k.o simply > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] errors in using DS1337

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hello, > > I am porting on a PowerPC (MPC7448) platform. > OK, what type of southbridge are you using (and ultimately which I2C controller)? regards, Ben - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Micros

Re: [U-Boot-Users] errors in using DS1337

hello, I am porting on a PowerPC (MPC7448) platform. thank you. >> > It would help to know what platform you're building for. The functions > mentioned are prototyped in 'i2c.h', but don't appear in all I2C > drivers (I'm thinking of the ARM ones that are in drivers/i2c). If > you're usin

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] ppc4xx: Add initial esd PMC440 board files

Hi Stefan, > IIRC, I didn't even try to apply this version of the patch. I tried to review > it and failed because the patch was "unreadable" for me. Hm, then I am not sure what you meant by this passage from your mail: > > This option you used to make the patches smaller (find-copies or > > so

Re: [U-Boot-Users] errors in using DS1337

Hi lxg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hello, > > when I choose to use DS1337, I add definitions in header file: > > #define CONFIG_RTC_DS1337 > #define CFG_I2C_RTC_ADDR0x68 > but, during making process, error appears: > > rtc/librtc.a(ds1337.o): in function 'rtc_read': > .../rtc/ds1337.c: 172: un

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [rfc] new spiflash subsystem

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> >> >> ==> This is not how the dataflash support is implemented in U-Boot today. >> >> Current implementation is using DMA. >> > >> > Note that you are referring to code that is not part of the public >> > U-Boot tree, and that (as is) will

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] make the machid configurable via theenvironment (Was: [PATCH] Changed load address and entrypoint for uImage to ZRELADDR + 6MB)

Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > But does U-Boot properly provide machine information to the kernel these > > days? I have been and still being burned by U-Boot hardcoding the > > _wrong_ machine ID, and therefore custom built kernels from k.o simply > > won't boot on those boards without hacking the kern

[U-Boot-Users] sprintf in standalone

Hi! Having problem with the sprintf function, I did the exporting and updating of the files accordantly to the README.standalone. The standalone application seems to compile without error. But once I do the go 40004 I get Alignment Exception and the board resets. If I remove the sprintf line every

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] ppc4xx: Add initial esd PMC440 board files

Hi Detlev, On Wednesday 30 January 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote: > > This option you used to make the patches smaller (find-copies or > > something like this) really makes reviewing not easy. And additionally > > the patch doesn't apply anymore, since the reference (sequoia) has > > changed in my non

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] ppc4xx: Add initial esd PMC440 board files

Hi Stefan, > Hi Matthias, > > On Friday 28 December 2007, Matthias Fuchs wrote: >> This patch adds the first files for the new esd PMC440 boards. >> The next two patches will complete the PMC440 board support. >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> --- >> board/{amcc/sequoia =

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [rfc] new spiflash subsystem

On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > > ==> And this is not a good approach, you want the S/W to use the > > first 256 kB to store initial boot, U-boot and environment. > > The AT91SAM9 chips will use the first 8 kB s

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] disable caches before booting an app for Blackfin apps

On Wednesday 30 January 2008, Rafal Jaworowski wrote: > Hi Mike, > > > It isn't generally save to execute applications outside of U-Boot with > > caches enabled due to the way the Blackfin processor handles caches > > (requires software assistance). This patch disables caches before > > booting an

[U-Boot-Users] errors in using DS1337

hello, when I choose to use DS1337, I add definitions in header file: #define CONFIG_RTC_DS1337 #define CFG_I2C_RTC_ADDR0x68 but, during making process, error appears: rtc/librtc.a(ds1337.o): in function 'rtc_read': .../rtc/ds1337.c: 172: undefined reference to 'i2c_reg_read' rtc/librtc.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [rfc] new spiflash subsystem

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > >> ==> This is not how the dataflash support is implemented in U-Boot today. > >> Current implementation is using DMA. > > > > Note that you are referring to code that is not part of the public > > U-Boot tree, and that (as is) will never be

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] disable caches before booting an app for Blackfin apps

Hi Mike, > It isn't generally save to execute applications outside of U-Boot with caches > enabled due to the way the Blackfin processor handles caches (requires > software assistance). This patch disables caches before booting an ELF or > just booting raw code. The previous discussion on the pa

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Booting Standalone App?

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > So what are the steps to get u-boot to boot the hello_world example? I'm > evaluating the PowerPC 440-based AMCC Yosemite board. This is what I have > done: Please RTFM. > I'm a complete newbie to u-boot and I've tried to find discussions online > an

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] make the machid configurable via the environment (Was: [PATCH] Changed load address and entry point for uImage to ZRELADDR + 6MB)

Hello Nicolas, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > But does U-Boot properly provide machine information to the kernel these > > days? I have been and still being burned by U-Boot hardcoding the > > _wrong_ machine ID, and therefore custom built kernels from k.o simply > > won't boot on those boards without

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM 0/5] AT91CAP9 support

> -Original Message- > From: Stelian Pop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 January 2008 19:57 > To: Peter Pearse > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH ARM 0/5] AT91CAP9 support > > Hi Peter, > > > This series of patches adds support for Atmel's AT91CAP9 > Customizable > > Microcont