Re: [U-Boot-Users] 83xx SPD_EEPROM DDR2 Issues

2008-06-04 Thread Russell McGuire
Guys, I think I have found a reason / partial fix, after getting some parameters tweaked and pimping out the debug routine to printf() almost the entire SPD table here is what I found. 1) The SPD tables for DDR1 and DDR2 are dfferent by about 10-15%. We'll need to add a separate SPD struct to

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/6] DM9000: Several fixes/cleanups for the DM9000A controller

2008-06-04 Thread Stefano Babic
Remy Bohmer wrote: In a few minutes I will post a patch which I hope it will solve this. Can you please try it on your board? I have tried, the old error is gone, but the board hangs probably after getting the first packets: $ tftp 0xa001 u-boot.bin dm9000 i/o: 0x800, id: 0x9a46

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Non-block-skipping NAND commands (was: Loading from NAND using 'nboot' Periodically Fails Where 'nand read' Succeeds)

2008-06-04 Thread Matthias Fuchs
Hi Scott, we are using the NAND stuff for a couple of boards. All use the .i or .jffs2 extension. So I also vote for making skipping the default. But the extensions should be preserved :-) Matthias On Tuesday 03 June 2008 00:07, Scott Wood wrote: Grant Erickson wrote: Thanks for the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/6] DM9000: Several fixes/cleanups for the DM9000A controller

2008-06-04 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Stefano, Thanks for testing these patches on the trizeps board. This is very useful debug info. I did not expect these problems, but I will continue debugging them. I assume the problem is caused by patch 05, about fixing the receive path for DM9000A. Is this correct? Just to be sure: Does

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: add support for BF538/BF539

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Mike, On Sunday 01 June 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: What is the licensing of this file, and who is the Copyright holder? it's all ADI written and owned. we dont particularly care about the license, Ummm... Mike, you are a well-know

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/6] DM9000: Several fixes/cleanups for the DM9000A controller

2008-06-04 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Stefano, I have tried, the old error is gone, but the board hangs probably after getting the first packets: I believe I found the problem. During a last minute cleanup I broke something that only breaks it in 32 bit mode. So, it is probably not patch number 5, but patch number 1 that

[U-Boot-Users] [patch] Fix order for reading rx-status registers in 32bit mode of DM9000

2008-06-04 Thread Remy Bohmer
A last minute cleanup before submitting the DM9000A patch series yesterday introduced a bug in reading the rx-status registers in 32bit mode only. This patch repairs this. Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/dm9000x.c |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: use on-chip syscontrol() to reset

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Mike, On Sunday 01 June 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: When available, use the on-chip syscontrol() rom function to perform a system reset rather than our own local method. ... - asm(jump (%0); : : a (bfin_reset)); + if (0

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Non-block-skipping NAND commands

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Scott, Grant Erickson wrote: Thanks for the suggestion. That solved it. As an academic exercise, is there any practical reason a system would want to use nboot, as I erroneously chose to do, without .i|.jffs2|.e? I don't think so, though I don't know the history involved. Does anyone

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Ethernet POST freeze on 440EPx boards (PMC440, sequoia)

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Matthias, I noticed some strange issues with our PMC440 (PPC440PEx based) board and also with the sequoia eval platform. In a certain configuration these boards stuck during the Ethernet POST tests. When they got stuck, it is even not possible to attach with a BDI2000. Oh, this hints to

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: use on-chip syscontrol() to reset

2008-06-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 04 June 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote: On Sunday 01 June 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: When available, use the on-chip syscontrol() rom function to perform a system reset rather than our own local method. -asm(jump (%0); :

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Blackfin: bf533-ezkit: shuffle flash defines a little

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Mike, On Sunday 01 June 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Please STOP messing with license headers. so you want it in a separate commit ? I do not want to see any of these one-line GPL headers. Please use the regular, full heade. And especially

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 05/17 Try 2] U-Boot-V2:ARM: Introduce capability tohavedifferent stack/malloc area

2008-06-04 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:04:51AM -0500, Menon, Nishanth wrote: Sascha, -Original Message- From: Sascha Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:24 AM To: Menon, Nishanth Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Laurent Desnogues; [EMAIL PROTECTED];

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: add support for BF538/BF539

2008-06-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 04 June 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote: On Sunday 01 June 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: What is the licensing of this file, and who is the Copyright holder? it's all ADI written and owned. we dont particularly care about the license,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Wolfgang, PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot Although I think this is a good idea, I do not particularly like some details. This patch adds macros from linux/include/asm-powerpc/io.h to clear and set bits in one shot using the in_be32, out_be32, etc. accessor

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/6] DM9000: Several fixes/cleanups for the DM9000A controller

2008-06-04 Thread Stefano Babic
Remy Bohmer wrote: I will post a mail in a few minutes solving this... Please apply this new past on top of the 6-patches series I posted yesterday. Great ! It works, I tested now with bigger files and it sounds good ! I have seen that the complete patch (all patch 0-xx) is not so big and

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Add support for mpc8313 based BUBBATWO

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Tor, These patches add support for the mpc8313 based BUBBATWO board. Signed-off-by: Tor Krill [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- MAINTAINERS|4 + MAKEALL|1 + Makefile |3 + include/configs/BUBBATWO.h | 516

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND FSL UPM: driver re-write using the hwcontrol callback

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi, Stefan Roese wrote: On Monday 02 June 2008, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] All 4 patches are maintained by different people. What is the fastest way to get these patches in? Maybe Stefan could

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Hi Detlev, Detlev Zundel wrote: Hi Wolfgang, PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot Although I think this is a good idea, I do not particularly like some details. This patch adds macros from linux/include/asm-powerpc/io.h to clear and set bits in one shot using the

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
PPC: add accessor macros to clear and set bits in one shot This patch adds macros from linux/include/asm-powerpc/io.h to clear and set bits in one shot using the in_be32, out_be32, etc. accessor functions. They are very handy to manipulate bits it I/O registers. This patch is required for my

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 7/8] ppc4xx: Remove superfluous dram_init() call or replace it by initdram()

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Stefan, Historically the 405 U-Boot port had a dram_init() call in early init stage. This function was still called from start.S and most of the time coded in assembler. This is not needed anymore (since a long time) and boards should implement the common initdram() function in C instead.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot-1.2.0 cross compilation fails

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi George, I was trying to build u-boot-1.2.0 for atmel (u-boot source code delivered by the board vendor). Tried this: $ make CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux- sam9l9260_config $ make CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux- but it failed: make -C tools all make[1]: Entering directory

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Initial support for ABB Syscon III

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Andy, On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sergei Poselenov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Sergei Poselenov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this board different from the socrates board that went in? The code appears identical (though I admit I did not

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/6] DM9000: Several fixes/cleanups for the DM9000A controller

2008-06-04 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Stefano, Great ! It works, I tested now with bigger files and it sounds good ! Good news! I have seen that the complete patch (all patch 0-xx) is not so big and smaller as the limit of the mailing list (17k 40k). What about to send only the complete patch ? It is easier to read for

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 7/8] ppc4xx: Remove superfluous dram_init() call or replace it by initdram()

2008-06-04 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Detlev, On Wednesday 04 June 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote: I put those maintainers that I could find on CC to inform them. You could have done the same ;) I intended to do so. But unfortunately forgot about it. Sorry about that. Best regards, Stefan

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] TQM: move TQM boards to board/tqc

2008-06-04 Thread wg
From: Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Move all TQM board directories to the vendor specific directory tqc for modules from TQ-Components GmbH (http://www.tqc.de). Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Makefile | 30

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] TQM: move TQM boards to board/tqc

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Andy Fleming wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Andy Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Move all TQM board directories to the vendor specific directory tqc for modules from TQ-Components

[U-Boot-Users] how to change u-boot to work with new flash on freescale mpc83233 rdb platform

2008-06-04 Thread Guild Jackson
Hi all, I am currently working with the freescale mpc8323e rdb and need to change from flash JS28F128J3D to JS28F256P33 (with part number JS28F256P33T95). Does anyone know what changes I need to do on the u-boot source to get this new flash working on my platform? I saw, in the file

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Problem creating new uImage

2008-06-04 Thread Bartlomiej Sieka
Markus Klotzbücher wrote: Dear List, I'm facing a problem creating a new fdt image following the instructions in the u-boot/doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt u-boot and dtc are top of git: $ dtc -v Version: DTC 1.1.0-g050e6f0c ~/src/git/u-boot/ $ git-describe v1.3.3-32-gf2aeecc I'm in

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Problem creating new uImage

2008-06-04 Thread Markus Klotzbücher
Hi Bartlomiej, Bartlomiej Sieka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Line 11 of doc/uImage.FIT/kernel_fdt.its is: data = /incbin/(./vmlinux.bin.gz); So most likely your problem is due to mainline dtc not supporting binary includes (yet). You need to patch it with original Scott Wood's patch, see:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/6] DM9000: Several fixes/cleanups for the DM9000A controller

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Warren
Remy Bohmer wrote: Hello Stefano, Great ! It works, I tested now with bigger files and it sounds good ! Good news! I have seen that the complete patch (all patch 0-xx) is not so big and smaller as the limit of the mailing list (17k 40k). What about to send only the complete

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 1/1] try to fix problem on the trizeps board DM9000 error: status check fail: 0x6d

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Warren
Remy, On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the Application Notes of the DM9000, only the 2 bits 0:1 of the status byte need to be checked to identify a valid packet in the fifo But, The several different Application Notes do not all speak the same

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] Get rid of annoying/superfluous bad-checksum warning message

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Warren
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: U-boot can complain a lot about 'checksum bad' when it is attached to the network. It is annoying for ordinary users who start to doubt the network connection in general when they see messages like this. This is caused by

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] Fix for CONFIG_BOOTP_RANDOM_DELAY does not compile.

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Warren
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The option CONFIG_BOOTP_RANDOM_DELAY does not compile, because of a missing 'extern' inside the net/bootp.h header. Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied to net repo. thanks, Ben

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] Fix order for reading rx-status registers in 32bit mode of DM9000

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Warren
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A last minute cleanup before submitting the DM9000A patch series yesterday introduced a bug in reading the rx-status registers in 32bit mode only. This patch repairs this. Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/6] DM9000: Several fixes/cleanups for the DM9000A controller

2008-06-04 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Ben, I only encountered one whitespace issue, in patch 5 and was able to fix it. I use the --whitespace=strip option in git-am, so trailing whitespace isn't a problem. Thanks! I've applied your patches to the net repo, and since you submitted them by the deadline it should go in this

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Question About how the CPU find the right string address in U-boot binary file ?

2008-06-04 Thread Kenneth Johansson
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 12:04 +0800, wang baohua wrote: Dear all, I study the U-boot.bin file using the objdump command, I don't know how the CPU can find the right string address when puts() string. For example, In my binary file, the string Call backtrace: in func print_backtrace()

[U-Boot-Users] AMCC Bamboo boot from NAND Flash is broken

2008-06-04 Thread Eugene O'Brien
Hi Stefan, Yesterday I decided to update u-boot from the u-boot-ppc4xx repo. I boot my board similarly to the Bamboo NAND flash boot. So after I re-flashed U-Boot ... nothing ... I bricked my board ... thanks! The good news is that the fix is relatively simple. I took a look at the code and I

Re: [U-Boot-Users] AMCC Bamboo boot from NAND Flash is broken

2008-06-04 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Eugene, On Wednesday 04 June 2008, Eugene O'Brien wrote: Yesterday I decided to update u-boot from the u-boot-ppc4xx repo. I boot my board similarly to the Bamboo NAND flash boot. So after I re-flashed U-Boot ... nothing ... I bricked my board ... thanks! Sorry about that. I hope you were

Re: [U-Boot-Users] 83xx SPD_EEPROM DDR2 Issues

2008-06-04 Thread Bruce_Leonard
None of these is the 'correct' fix, but if somebody wants the code I'll be happy to post. I will be working with Freescale to find info on the ODT-50-ohm problem and possible other solutions. -Russ Is there a correct fix? You sort of implied that even a look up table wouldn't solve

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix problem with SDRAM init in bamboo NAND booting port

2008-06-04 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch fixes a problem spotted by Eugene O'Brian (thanks Eugene) introduced by the commit: ppc4xx/NAND_SPL: Consolidate 405 and 440 NAND booting code in start.S With this patch SDRAM will get initialized again and booting from NAND is working again. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: add support for BF538/BF539

2008-06-04 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Mike, Um actually, caring that a project stears clean of copyright violations copyright violations != licensing violations Yes of course, you are right here. that may later be used to take down the whole project has got zero to do with subscribing to the FSF mentatlity. Thinking about

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 1/1] try to fix problem on the trizeps board DM9000 error: status check fail: 0x6d

2008-06-04 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Ben, I can't get this to apply. Please re-base after applying your 6-patch set and the one that changes the order of rx status processing (or against the current net tree would be even better). I just pulled the net repo and I see the problem: You forgot to apply patch number 5 of my

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix problem with SDRAM init in bamboo NAND booting port

2008-06-04 Thread Eugene O'Brien
Hi Stefan, This patch fixes a problem spotted by Eugene O'Brian (thanks Eugene) introduced by the commit: ppc4xx/NAND_SPL: Consolidate 405 and 440 NAND booting code in start.S With this patch SDRAM will get initialized again and booting from NAND is working again. Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 1/1] try to fix problem on the trizeps board DM9000 error: status check fail: 0x6d

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Warren
Remy Bohmer wrote: Hello Ben, I can't get this to apply. Please re-base after applying your 6-patch set and the one that changes the order of rx status processing (or against the current net tree would be even better). I just pulled the net repo and I see the problem: You forgot

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix problem with SDRAM init in bamboo NAND booting port

2008-06-04 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Eugene, On Wednesday 04 June 2008, Eugene O'Brien wrote: This patch fixes a problem spotted by Eugene O'Brian (thanks Eugene) introduced by the commit: ppc4xx/NAND_SPL: Consolidate 405 and 440 NAND booting code in start.S With this patch SDRAM will get initialized again and booting

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mips: Bring over optimized memset() routine from Linux.

2008-06-04 Thread Jason McMullan
This commit pulls over the memset() MIPS routine from Linux 2.6.26, which provides a 10x to 20x speedup over the generic byte-at-a-time routine. This is especially useful on platforms with manual ECC scrubbing, that require all of memory to be written at least once after a power cycle. ---

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH/review] Blackfin: add support for BF538/BF539

2008-06-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 04 June 2008, Detlev Zundel wrote: that may later be used to take down the whole project has got zero to do with subscribing to the FSF mentatlity. Thinking about it, it doesn't even make sense to me that you express your distaste of the FSF from such a non-correlated topic.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [ppc4xx] Please pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: The following changes since commit 727f63334676e760877d43bfb8f0e9331ac8b101: Hebbar (1): common/usb.c: fix incorrect escape sequence are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git master Gary Jennejohn

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request USB

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Dear Wolfgang, Please pull: The following changes since commit 2c8d41969b47eb0b973912830c58689b2ba0e50a: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-testing are available in the git repository at:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request: nand-flash

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: The following changes since commit 1f1554841a4c8e069d331176f0c3059fb2bb8280: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-nand-flash.git

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] avr32 update

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Please pull the 'master' branch of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-avr32.git master to receive the below updates. The SPI stuff and a few other patches I've posted are not included here since they aren't really avr32-related. I'm hoping you'll still

Re: [U-Boot-Users] AT91 pull request

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Please pull at91 The following changes since commit 2c8d41969b47eb0b973912830c58689b2ba0e50a: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-testing are available in the git repository at:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] fat32 w/o parition table? (a.k.a VBR instead of MBR)

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hello, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: After some user complaints about not being able to fatls micro sd cards which were formatted by Windows XP, I felt compelled to make the following change (to u-boot 1.1.6, which I know is ancient, but looking at the git tree, the latest

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/4 V2] PPC: Create and use CONFIG_HIGH_BATS

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: From: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Change all code that conditionally operates on high bat registers (that is, BATs 4-7) to look at CONFIG_HIGH_BATS instead of the myriad ways this is done now. Define the option for every config for which high bats

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/4 V4] PPC: Change lib_ppc/bat_rw.c to use high bats

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: From: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently, this code only deals with BATs 0-3, which makes it useless on systems that support BATs 4-7. Add the support for these registers. Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- No, I'm not

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/4 V3] PPC: Add print_bats() to lib_ppc/bat_rw.c

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: From: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] This function prints the values of all the BAT register pairs - I needed this for debug earlier this week; adding it to lib_ppc so others can use it (and add it to reginfo commands if so desired). Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] memsize.c: support larger memory ranges

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
The long data types used so far in common/memsize.c cause problems with larger memories, i. e. when accessing memory above 0x8000. Pointed out by David Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:19:37 -0400 Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- common/memsize.c | 26

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH]: Fix for bug: U-boot environment corrupt by reading uninitialized flash memory instead of RAM.

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]@transmode.se you wrote: If you do not like the way it is fixed, then remove git-commit c0559be371b2a64b1a817088c3308688e2182f93 which causes this regression for the time being, to buy more time to fix it in a different/better way for the next release.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] [new uImage] Avoid initrd and logbuffer area overlaps

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Add logbuffer to reserved LMB areas to prevent initrd allocation from overlaping with it. Make sure to use correct logbuffer base address. Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- v2 fixes build errors for PPC targets without

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Make sure common.h is the first include.

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: If common.h isn't first we can get CONFIG_ options defined in the board config file ignored. This can cause an issue if any of those config options impact the size of types of data structures (eg CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT). Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Proposal for u-boot-nand-flash custodian change

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Some time passed now, and we have only positive feedback to my suggestion. So I think we should move on and really switch this custodianship. Wolfgang, could you please arrange that Scott has access to the repo and list him as Custodian? Just to

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] MPC512x: Change traps.c to not reference non-addressable memory

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: From: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Currently, END_OF_RAM is used by the trap code to determine if we should attempt to access the stack pointer or not. However, on systems with a lot of RAM, only a subset of the RAM is guaranteed to be mapped in and

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix warnings from gcc-4.3.0 build on a ppc host

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: * The cfi_flash.c memset fix actual allows the board to boot so there is a bit more going on here than just resolving warnings associated with uninitialized variables. * include/asm/bitops.h:302: warning: '__swab32p' is static but used in inline

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/3] ported to Aztek Networks, Inc. cta5000s, mpc8250 based

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: --- board/cta5000s/Makefile | 50 board/cta5000s/config.mk | 30 +++ board/cta5000s/cta5000s.c | 565 + 3 files changed, 645 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] soft_i2c: Pull SDA high before reading

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Spotted by Dean Capindale. Systems that support open-drain GPIO properly are allowed provide an empty I2C_TRISTATE define. However, this means that we need to be careful not to drive SDA low when the slave is expected to respond. This patch adds a

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] ported to Aztek Networks, Inc. cta5000s, mpc8250 based

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: --- include/configs/cta5000s.h | 663 1 files changed, 663 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/configs/cta5000s.h Descriptive subject missing. Signed-off-by line missing. Please

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC/PATCH 1/6] Move definition of container_of() to common.h

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: AVR32 and AT91SAM9 both have their own identical definitions of container_of() taken from the Linux kernel. Move it to common.h so that all architectures can use it. container_of() is already used by some drivers, and will be used extensively by the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC/PATCH 2/6] SPI API improvements

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: From: Haavard Skinnemoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] This patch gets rid of the spi_chipsel table and adds a handful of new functions that makes the SPI layer cleaner and more flexible. ... Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC/PATCH 3/6] atmel_spi: Driver for the Atmel SPI controller

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] This adds a driver for the SPI controller found on most AT91 and AVR32 chips, implementing the new SPI API. Changed in v4: - Update to new API - Handle zero-length transfers appropriately. The user

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC/PATCH 5/6] SPI Flash: Add sf command

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: This adds a new command, sf which can be used to manipulate SPI flash. Currently, initialization, reading, writing and erasing is supported. Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- common/Makefile |1 + common/cmd_sf.c | 191

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC/PATCH 4/6] SPI Flash subsystem

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: This adds a new SPI flash subsystem. Currently, only AT45 DataFlash in non-power-of-two mode is supported, but some preliminary support for other flash types is in place as well. Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Makefile

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] DTT: Issue one-shot command on AD7414 (LM75 code) to read temp

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: On AD7414 the first value upon bootup is not read correctly. This is most likely because of the 800ms update time of the temp register in normal update mode. To get current values each time we issue the dtt command including upon powerup we switch into

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v3] PPC4xx: Simplified post_word_{load, store}

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: This patch simplifies post_word_{load,store} by using the preprocessor to eliminate redundant, copy-and-pasted code. Signed-off-by: Grant Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- cpu/ppc4xx/commproc.c | 26 +++--- 1 files changed, 11

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Additional fix to readline_into_buffer() with CONFIG_CMDLINE_EDITING before relocating

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Removed unneeded command line history initialization. Also, the original code would access the 'initted' variable before relocation to SDRAM which resulted in erratic behavior since the bss is not initialized when executing from flash. Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix incorrect switch for IF_TYPE in part.c

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Use correct field in block_dev_desc_t when writing interface type in dev_print. Error introduced in 574b319512b13e10800f0045e39b993f4ca25e42. Changes: * Added fix from Martin Krause Signed-off-by: Tor Krill [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- disk/part.c |

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add defines for Altera Cyclone-II FPGAs

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Add size #defines for Cyclone-II EP2C8 and EP2C20. Signed-off-by: Andre Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This should be ---. Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB

Re: [U-Boot-Users] From: Sergei Poselenov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Signed-off-by: Sergei Poselenov [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- board/socrates/socrates.c | 13 +++-- include/configs/socrates.h |3 ++- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Applied (wwith cleaned-up subject). Best regards,

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/8] ppc4xx: Consolidate PPC4xx SDRAM/DDR/DDR2 defines, part2

2008-06-04 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch now adds a new header file (asm-ppc/ppc4xx-sdram.h) for all ppc4xx related SDRAM/DDR/DDR2 controller defines. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/asm-ppc/ppc4xx-sdram.h | 1156 1 files changed, 1156 insertions(+), 0

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Lite5200b ethernet driver

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hello Billa, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Right now I am working with the Lite5200B board and am building an ethernet driver based on the one that comes with u-boot. It works fine but I want the frame reception work driven by interrupt not by polling. Why don't you use the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/6] DM9000: Several fixes/cleanups for the DM9000A controller

2008-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ben, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Is the merge window open for the rest of today, or is it closed? If open, I'll look at this patch set later today and act on it. Otherwise this goes into the 'for later' bin. I did a terrible job of (not) merging patches during the last

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch 0/6] DM9000: Several fixes/cleanups for the DM9000A controller

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Warren
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Ben, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Is the merge window open for the rest of today, or is it closed? If open, I'll look at this patch set later today and act on it. Otherwise this goes into the 'for later'

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request: u-boot-net

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Warren
Wolfgang, Ben Warren wrote: Wolfgang, Please pull from the net repo: The following changes since commit 2c8d41969b47eb0b973912830c58689b2ba0e50a: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-testing are available in the git repository at:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/8] ppc4xx: Consolidate PPC4xx SDRAM/DDR/DDR2 defines, part2

2008-06-04 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Stefan Roese wrote: This patch now adds a new header file (asm-ppc/ppc4xx-sdram.h) for all ppc4xx related SDRAM/DDR/DDR2 controller defines. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/asm-ppc/ppc4xx-sdram.h | 1156 1 files changed,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Question About how the CPU find the right string address in U-boot binary file ?

2008-06-04 Thread wang baohua
Sorry for my poor English. I want to clearly understand the linking processes,especially detail string loading process. In fact, I use objcopy to convert the u-boot.bin to u-boot.elf, then using objdump to process elf. (In my real enviroment, I only had the MIPS arch binary format, need to convert

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/8] ppc4xx: Consolidate PPC4xx SDRAM/DDR/DDR2 defines, part2

2008-06-04 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Jerry, On Thursday 05 June 2008, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Stefan Roese wrote: This patch now adds a new header file (asm-ppc/ppc4xx-sdram.h) for all ppc4xx related SDRAM/DDR/DDR2 controller defines. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/asm-ppc/ppc4xx-sdram.h |

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Squash warnings from pointer aliasing in dlmalloc

2008-06-04 Thread Kumar Gala
When we building with gcc-4.3.x on a ppc host we get the following warnings: dlmalloc.c: In function 'malloc_extend_top': dlmalloc.c:1971: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules dlmalloc.c:1999: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break