Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix non-working mvBL-M7

Kim, thanks - ok. Switching to U_BOOT_VERSION should be no problem. regards, André Kim Phillips schrieb: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:25:34 +0200 > Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Andre, > >> diff --git a/include/configs/MVBLM7.h b/include/configs/MVBLM7.h >> index 349ca14..8c0

[U-Boot-Users] Ethernet stopped working after upgrading from 1.1.5 to 1.3.3

Hi all, Can anyone point me in the right direction to figure out why after porting up to 1.3.3 from 1.1.5 I'm getting a "No ethernet found." error. I'm using a cirrus logic EP9302 Arm processor that was someone initially ported to u-boot 1.1.5. So I'm not to familiar with how the CPU specific fil

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix non-working mvBL-M7

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:25:34 +0200 Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Andre, > diff --git a/include/configs/MVBLM7.h b/include/configs/MVBLM7.h > index 349ca14..8c0e8b6 100644 > --- a/include/configs/MVBLM7.h > +++ b/include/configs/MVBLM7.h > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > #ifndef __CONFIG_H >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix system config overwrite @ MPC834x and MPC8313

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:40:56 +0200 Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > During 83xx setup the "System I/O configuration register high" gets > overwritten with user defined value if CFG_SICRH is defined. > > Regarding to the MPC834x manual (Table 5-28 reve.1) bits 28+29 of SICRH > must keep

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix dm9000 receive status and len little endian issue

Ben, The data (packet data) and the status/len are different in LE/BE, cannot use just the macro dm9000_x to cover both. In my case, packet data is already in BE, but the status/len is in LE; therefore, status/len require byteswap. This has to do with cpu endian mode. Regards, TsiChung -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] RRvision now uses the CFI driver so board/RRvision/flash.c gets deleted.

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:28:25 +0200 Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > board/RRvision/flash.c | 522 > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 522 deletions(-) > delete mode 10

Re: [U-Boot-Users] at91sam9260-ek intermittenly fails at u-boot init

Norman Cheung wrote: > U-boot fails intermittently at the start. When it fails, it didn't make it to > my first printf statement. When I use JTAG to debug it, it always works. > > If the board has been let without power for 1+ hour, it will also boot up > when > I apply power to it(something

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix dm9000 receive status and len little endian issue

Tsi-Chung Liew wrote: > From: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The received status and len was in little endian > format and caused the ethernet unable to proceed > further. Add __le16_to_cpu() in dm9000_rx_status_8/16/32bit(). > > Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > driv

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix dm9000 receive status and len little endian issue

From: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The received status and len was in little endian format and caused the ethernet unable to proceed further. Add __le16_to_cpu() in dm9000_rx_status_8/16/32bit(). Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/dm9000x.c | 16 ++---

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix dm9000 receive status and len little endian issue

Sure. > Do you provide a patch for those routines too? (if required) Just the dm9000_rx_status_16bit(). Will re-submit with 8 and 32. Regards, TsiChung -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remy Bohmer Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:50 PM To

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix dm9000 receive status and len little endian issue

Hello Tsi-Chung, > The received status and len was in little endian > format and caused the ethernet unable to proceed > further. Add __le16_to_cpu() in dm9000_rx_status_16bit(). I can imagine that similar problems are also valid for the 32bit code (and maybe the 8 bit code too) It is probably be

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix dm9000 receive status and len little endian issue

From: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The received status and len was in little endian format and caused the ethernet unable to proceed further. Add __le16_to_cpu() in dm9000_rx_status_16bit(). Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/dm9000x.c |4 ++-- 1 files chan

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix dm9000 receive status and len little endian issue

Hi Tsi-Chung, Tsi-Chung Liew wrote: > From: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The received status and len was in little endian > format and caused the ethernet unable to proceed > further. Add define CFG_DM9000_BYTESWAP_STATUS_LEN in > dm9000_rx_status_16bit() to byte swap RxStatus and RxLen >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Set manually tsec speed in u-boot 1.2.0

Hi Frank, Frank Prepelica wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > is there a way to set the tsec speed in u-boot (v1.2.0) manually to > 100Mbit? Because u-boot always uses 1Gbit although the > > link speed is fixed set(in windows) to 100Mbit. > > > How does Windows fit into this? Are you booting Windows

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V8] ARM: Add support for Lyrtech SFF-SDRboard (ARM926EJS)

Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> ARM: This patch adds support for the Lyrtech SFF-SDR >> board, based on the TI DaVinci architecture (ARM926EJS). > > I haven´t heard from anyone about my patch being accepted or not. > It´s been almost five weeks since I submitted the first vers

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix dm9000 receive status and len little endian issue

From: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The received status and len was in little endian format and caused the ethernet unable to proceed further. Add define CFG_DM9000_BYTESWAP_STATUS_LEN in dm9000_rx_status_16bit() to byte swap RxStatus and RxLen Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Unable to boot linux 2.6.25 with U-Boot 1.1.4

rohit h wrote: > I am working on OMAP2420 (ARM 11) based apollon board. > Sorry, missed that.. Don't sure about this particular CPU, but with Atmel's AT91 there was some migration to new serial driver interface. I faced similar problem when booting 2.6.25 kernel, but after studying some code -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Unable to boot linux 2.6.25 with U-Boot 1.1.4

What CPU? Kind regards, Andrejs Cainikovs. rohit h wrote: Hello everyone. I have got a modified u-boot source which boots vanilla 2.6.22 kernel, but is unable to boot vanilla 2.6.25. The message I get is this : Uncompressing Linux...

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to specify the starting function of aU-boot standalone application.

Hi Jason, McMullan, Jason schrieb: > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 07:44 +0200, Jens Gehrlein wrote: >> I have the same problem. When I modify the source code the compiler may >> or may not rearrange the functions. It is not guaranteed, that the main >> function always starts at the same address. >> >>

Re: [U-Boot-Users] How to specify the starting function of aU-boot standalone application.

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 07:44 +0200, Jens Gehrlein wrote: > I have the same problem. When I modify the source code the compiler may > or may not rearrange the functions. It is not guaranteed, that the main > function always starts at the same address. > > How can this be solved? Is it possible/mea

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Unable to boot linux 2.6.25 with U-Boot 1.1.4

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you have CONFIG_CLOCKS_IN_MHZ defined? If so, try turning it off. > Nope, it is undefined. Thanks, Rohit - Check out the new SourceForge.net

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Unable to boot linux 2.6.25 with U-Boot 1.1.4

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:05 PM, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Activate in the linux kernel CONFIG_LL_DEBUG ( maybe ?! ) and check > that the u_boot_board_id == linux_board_id I am working on OMAP2420 (ARM 11) based apollon board. The board id in u-boot is ( in file board/apollon.c, board_i

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add mechanisms for CPU and board-specific Ethernet initialization

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The idea is that cpu_eth_init is a default for a CPU family, and > > board_eth_init is a board override, which can of course call cpu_eth_init. > What about a section to declare the netdev? Please, let's not overdo this. The patch

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add mechanisms for CPU and board-specific Ethernet initialization

On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The idea is that cpu_eth_init is a default for a CPU family, and > > > board_eth_init is a board override, which can of course call > > > cpu_eth_init. > > > > What about a secti

[U-Boot-Users] DataFlash Not Found(u-boot 1.1.6)

hi i have download u-boot 1.1.6 and i have compile it (u-boot.bin) i have some problem  1-how i can compile darrell loader  i have download a darrell loader but when i upload it the following message appear      (DataFlash Not Found)  my dataFlash is SST39VF3201 but i don't know it support it

[U-Boot-Users] DataFlash Not Found

hi i have download u-boot 1.1.6 and i have compile it (u-boot.bin) i have some problem  1-how i can compile darrell loader  i have download a darrell loader but when i upload it the following message appear      (DataFlash Not Found)  my dataFlash is SST39VF3201 but i don't know it support it

[U-Boot-Users] Set manually tsec speed in u-boot 1.2.0

Hi all, is there a way to set the tsec speed in u-boot (v1.2.0) manually to 100Mbit? Because u-boot always uses 1Gbit although the link speed is fixed set(in windows) to 100Mbit. Thanks Best regards Frank