Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
doc/README.qemu_mips |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/README.qemu_mips b/doc/README.qemu_mips
index 476c5e6..c9ac3f3 100644
--- a/doc/README.qemu_mips
+++ b/doc/README.qemu_mips
@@
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
*(volatile ulong *)(CFG_TIMERBASE + 0) =3D3D CFG_TIMER_RELOAD;
/*=20 TimerLoad */
^
- *(volatile ulong *)(CFG_TIMERBASE + 4) =3D3D CFG_TIMER_RELOAD;
/*=20 TimerValue */
^
Your patch is line-wrapped and cannot
Dear Ryan,
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
I have modified my patch. New macro CONFIG_SM501_ENABLE_2DENGINE be
included to specify codes what enable SM501 2D engine. The macro need be
declared in config header file.
Why does it need to enable 2D engine? The reason is
Hi,
The original source file has nothing to do with this problem.
Yes, but that is NOT the problem. The problem is that your mailer is
wrapping long lines when it sends your patch, thus corrpting it.
The source line may be long, but it is not broken.
It is your mailer which corrupts the patch by
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
I have modified my patch. New macro CONFIG_SM501_ENABLE_2DENGINE be
included to specify codes what enable SM501 2D engine. The macro need be
declared in config header file.
Why does it need to enable 2D engine? The reason is most of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Hi all,
This patch is part 2 for [PATCH:Enable 2D Engine in SM501]. New macro
CONFIG_SM501_ENABLE_2DENGINE be included to specify codes what enable SM501
2D engine. The macro need be declared in config header file.
Why does it need to enable 2D
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Yes. Sorry for the mistake. It was my M$ Office which was wrapping the
mail @ column 76 hence the issue.
I have changed it to 81 i have Re-Submitted the Patch. Hopefully. Its
Corrected Now.
Changed it to 81? I don't understand. What happens when
Hi,
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you wrote:
Yes. Sorry for the mistake. It was my M$ Office which was
wrapping the
mail @ column 76 hence the issue.
I have changed it to 81 i have Re-Submitted the Patch. Hopefully.
Its Corrected Now.
Changed it to 81? I don't understand.
Hi all,
Since last 2 weeks i am trying to send Patches to Uboot List and its failing
again again because of line wrap issue.
I have setup M$ office to Automatically Wrap text at 82 Chars
when i send mails which is less than 81 chars, it still wraps the text
somewhere around 65 chars.
I een
The current lcd_display_bitmap() function does not work properly
for the Atmel LCD controller.
2 fixes need to be done:-
(a) when setting the colour map, use the lcd_setcolreg() function
as provided by the Atmel driver
(b) the data is never actually written to the lcd framebuffer !!
Below
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I can turn this off completely in M$ Office
For Plain Text Mails, It Automatically Wraps the text. We can only set
the Number of characters to wrap
I checked found that the max characters that can be allowed b4
wrapping is 132
...which is why we
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
so please help me setup either M$ Office or guide me to send patches through
nabble forum
Type: man git-send-email
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office:
Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
so please help me setup either M$ Office or guide me to send patches through
nabble forum
Type: man git-send-email
Note that some host development platforms do not have git-send-email
installed along automatically. I have just
Hi,
Type: man git-send-email
But i am using a company email address and it uses Microsoft Exchange
server. I will check about configuring it but not sure.
TIA
Regards
Gururaja
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the
Hi Ryan,
I have modified my patch according to your suggestion. The only question is
that use debug() because I found all debug print msg lines are written as :
#ifdef DEBUG
printf(..);
#endif
Are you sure I need change my debug print to debug()?
Yes, please. We introduced the macro
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Type: man git-send-email
But i am using a company email address and it uses Microsoft Exchange
server. I will check about configuring it but not sure.
Does your server allow internal SMTP connections? Then it should be
easy to do. Also, ifdirect
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
From: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rename int mii_init(void) to void mii_init(void) for idmr
ColdFire platform
Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
board/idmr/mii.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
From: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rename OBJ to COBJ in board/platform/Makefile
Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
board/freescale/m5275evb/Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
From: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TASREG is ColdFire platform, the include ppc4xx.h in
board/esd/common/flash.c causes conflict.
Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
board/esd/common/flash.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
From: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Implement usec2ticks() which is used by fsl_i2c.c in
lib_m68k/time.c
Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
lib_m68k/time.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Applied,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gururaja Hebbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cpu/arm926ejs/versatile/timer.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/versatile/timer.c
b/cpu/arm926ejs/versatile/timer.c
index 32872d2..9659b67
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
doc/README.qemu_mips |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The current lcd_display_bitmap() function does not work properly
for the Atmel LCD controller.
2 fixes need to be done:-
(a) when setting the colour map, use the lcd_setcolreg() function
as provided by the Atmel driver
(b) the data is never
Hi,
although we were not aware of it, there is a registered trademark
'uboot' around. The owner of that trademark found our U-Boot wiki
pages[1],[2] urging us to resolve the conflict with his property. The
original page URLs did not include a hyphen because of the TWiki code
not allowing that.
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c64xx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+/*
+ * (C) Copyright 2006 DENX Software Engineering
Please add your name here.
I will add my copyright in a couple of files, but I would rather not add
it to Makefiles. Below
Hi Jean,
Processor: ST Nomadik(ARM9 based)
Sorry I'm not able to understand,What is Ditto?
Attached the log for the SD card issue.
FAT32:
It means we don't have any PATCH at present in uboot for FAT32.
What is the problem in FAT32?
Regards,
Naveen
-Original Message-
From:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
+ * (C) Copyright 2006 DENX Software Engineering
Please add your name here.
I will add my copyright in a couple of files, but I would rather not add
it to Makefiles. Below I quote an earlier post on this list (funnily, I
Note that in the
Dear friends,
I apologize for quite off topic questions, which is related to kernel
compilation instead of u-boot.
However I hope that someone would be so kind to help me to address the problem.
I'm working on a AT91SAM9260 board (which is quite similar to Atmel EK
board) compiling both u-boot
Dear Gino,
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
However I hope that someone would be so kind to help me to address the
problem.
I'm working on a AT91SAM9260 board (which is quite similar to Atmel EK
board) compiling both u-boot and kernel sources with ELDK 4.1.
A couple a week ago I
Its useful to know where the device tree is if we have set 'autostart'
to 'no. We come back to the prompt after a boot command and we can
than post process the device tree but we need to know where it was put
report this back via the env variable 'bootm_fdtaddr'.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL
THis is not the fault of Fedora 9 - we run this, too, on some systems,
and it works fine here. To me it seems a sif you missed to install a
few critical packages on your system.
I agree with you, even though is not easy to find what is missing.
...
HOSTCC scripts/mod/sumversion.o
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 16:25 +0200, Gino Mariucci wrote:
THis is not the fault of Fedora 9 - we run this, too, on some systems,
and it works fine here. To me it seems a sif you missed to install a
few critical packages on your system.
I agree with you, even though is not easy to find what
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about moving the
u-boot-users mailing list away from SourceForge and host it on
lists.denx.de instead.
There is a couple of reasons for this: SourceForge has freuently been
slow; there have been reports from many users who got unsubscribed
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about moving the
u-boot-users mailing list away from SourceForge and host it on
lists.denx.de instead.
Yes!
- k
-
This
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about moving the
u-boot-users mailing list away from SourceForge and host it on
lists.denx.de instead.
There is a couple of reasons for this: SourceForge has freuently
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 05:17:49PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Do you think this is a reasonable plan? Any hints, ideas, tips?
Yes, good idea! Local infrastructure has turned out to be much more
reliable than services like SF these days.
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel |
Do you think this is a reasonable plan? Any hints, ideas, tips?
Yes!
/Magnus
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 05:17:49PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
I would like to get your general opinion about moving the
u-boot-users mailing list away from SourceForge and host it on
lists.denx.de instead.
There is a couple of reasons for this: SourceForge has freuently been
slow; there
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about changing the U-Boot
version numbering scheme.
To be honest, I never really understood myself how this is supposed
to work and if the next version should be 1.3.4 or 1.4.0 or 2.0.0, i.
e. which changes / additions are important enough
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrew Dyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: U-Boot version numbering
To: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we go to date based
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about moving the
u-boot-users mailing list away from SourceForge and host it on
lists.denx.de instead.
There is a couple of reasons for this: SourceForge has freuently
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 17:17 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about moving the
u-boot-users mailing list away from SourceForge and host it on
lists.denx.de instead.
This sounds like a great idea to me!
jdl
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about changing the U-Boot
version numbering scheme.
To be honest, I never really understood myself how this is supposed
to work and if the next version should be
I am looking at U-Boot version DENX-v1.3.3 for the AMCC Sequoia board
(PPC440EPx).
The uart gpio configuration doesn't appear to match the schematics.
sequoia.h has the following GPIO settings:
{GPIO1_BASE, GPIO_OUT, GPIO_ALT3, GPIO_OUT_1}, /* GPIO34 UART0_DCD_N
UART1_DSR_CTS_N
I have to increase u-boot's partition size on my board to make room
for an application to be compiled as part of u-boot binary. I am
currently running u-boot version 1.3.1-rc1 and my current NOR
partition is as follows:
Partition Address
Ben Warren a écrit :
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about changing the U-Boot
version numbering scheme.
To be honest, I never really understood myself how this is supposed
to work and if the
Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Ben Warren a écrit :
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about changing the U-Boot
version numbering scheme.
To be honest, I never really understood myself how this is supposed
Wolfgang Denk,
Thanks for the reply, but I have a few questions.
The first is can U-boot load any application other than a Linux.
I simply want to use u-boot as a boot loader, to load a non-Linux app into
memory and jump to that app with or without uboot's hardware init. The
second wuestion is
Autoboot timeout in 1.3.4-rc2 prints incorrectly on my system.
We have a system based closely off of the mpc8548cds system. Prior
builds (1.3.4-rc1) didn't have this problem. Now during boot, the
autoboot announcement is incorrect. It is set for 1 second and actually
works in 1 second, but
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we go to date based versions. I'd prefer we keep year as 4 digits:
v1.2008.10
v1.2009.01
I agree, although doing that makes the third field look like a month
to the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
A minor :) issue I can see is that there might be *some* confusion
because of an apparent, numerical rollback from 1.3.4 back to 1.08.xx.
You're bound to encounter some folks who will ask, again and again, why
you're working on 1.02.yy when 1.3.4 is
Like a lot of others, I think v1.08.xx will be confusing alongside the existing
1.x.y releases.
As to the v1/v2 issues, the problem is that it's just a number and a greater
number implies progress and a unidirectional relationship. Given that v2
already exists concurrent with v1, it's
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
IMHO I think it is best to stick with the same version numbering
scheme that you started with, even if it is not perfect. The
alternative timestamp scheme is not perfect either. You can probably
find as many advantages for one as for the other, and the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Thanks for the reply, but I have a few questions.
The first is can U-boot load any application other than a Linux.
Of course it can. If you had read the manual, you should have found
the section about standalone applications. And of course it can
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Autoboot timeout in 1.3.4-rc2 prints incorrectly on my system.
We have a system based closely off of the mpc8548cds system. Prior
builds (1.3.4-rc1) didn't have this problem. Now during boot, the
autoboot announcement is incorrect. It is set for 1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I have verified that the Sequoia (440EPx) does not have its UARTs
properly configured. The attached patch corrects this by setting three
bits in SDR0_PFC1 to enable 4-wire mode, and to select cts/rts
functionality for the UARTs. Also, I modified the
Do you think this is a reasonable plan? Any hints, ideas, tips?
As everyone agree, it's a great idea
Best Regards,
J.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux
Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to get your general opinion about changing the U-Boot
version numbering scheme.
To be honest, I never really understood myself how this is supposed
to work and if the next version should be 1.3.4 or 1.4.0 or 2.0.0,
Feng Kan a écrit :
You can just do v2008.1.
That would be v2008.01, then, lest we want FTP sites to put november and
december releases between january and february. :)
You can add a third field for the day for those
really serious
bugs:)
What, and not be able to crank out several
Telling the truth it seems that I've used this function during debug in
fact at a deeper look it seems it disappeared from the code a part the
definition.
Ok I'm going to fix the problem and re-submit.
Any update about the re-submit patch?
Best Regards,
J.
Add more passion to your relations.
To those who look for perfect health.
Here!
engineries er-charged extincture
fat-headed escritoire fantasists
equipement episcopize enseignant
euonymuses eperdument ethambutol
-
61 matches
Mail list logo
