Re: [U-Boot-Users] problems with CRC in fw_printenv and fw_setenv utility and use

u-boot user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have built the binary fw_printenv by using mtd-user.h from mtd-utils on > the internet as it fw_printenv won't compile it without using that > file. So So you're obviously not using the newest version of U-Boot, what you should. Make sure to read the up

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Hi

Pooja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello I just started working with U boot and i haven't got a clue how > and what to do. How are we supposed to help you if you don't even know what you want to do? Reading the README is always a good start though. Best regards Markus Klotzbuecher -- DENX Sof

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Revised custodian git writeup

Hi Jerry, "gvb.uboot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've rewritten the "Tips for maintaining custodian trees" section to > reflect Wolfgang's request that the "master" branch be used for patches > for hi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Revised custodian git writeup

Dear Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> I think the difference with our use vs. the general case that the >> warning applies to is that the custodians are making their "master" >> branch conform exactly to the u-boot.git master br

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Edit U-Boot Env with fw_printenv & fw_saveenv

Hi Destrukto, Destrukto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well just a simple question, how can I use these commands. I found the > commands in the tools folder of U-Boot but they can't be compiled. So Compiles ok here: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/git/u-boot$ make env make -C tools/env all MTD_VERSION=

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Edit U-Boot Env with fw_printenv & fw_saveenv

Destrukto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, this was the first I've tried but it didn't work maybe you could > explain me the instruction step by step so I can check out where I've made a > mistake. Please post exactly what you did and what errors you got, and we'll try to tell you what you're

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Delete all env vars except read onlys

Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > what about a 'scrubenv' or 'cleanenv' command that tries to unset all > variables leaving readonlys untouched. > > The command could request a confirmation: > > => scrubenv > Do you really want to do this ('yes' or 'no')? yes Such a confirmation is no

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Delete all env vars except read onlys

Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Markus Klotzbücher wrote: >> > => scrubenv >> > Do you really want to do this ('yes' or 'no')? yes >> >> Such a confirmation is not very Unix-like and will preve

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Delete all env vars except read onlys

Detlev Zundel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Markus Klotzbücher wrote: >>>> > => scrubenv >>>> > Do you really want to do this ('yes' or &#x

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Delete all env vars except read onlys

uot; will blow away most of your > flash content without asking. [...] > Would that be acceptable to everybody? Sounds good! Best regards Markus Klotzbücher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194

Re: [U-Boot-Users] problems with CRC in fw_printenv and fw_setenv utility and use

techie_vasu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can you please tell me how to build the fw_setenv and fw_printenv > using Please make sure to read tools/env/README from *top of tree* U-Boot sources. > the mtd-user.h file? I am new to Linux. Please help. I don't see mtd/ in > proc/ directory. What

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ramdisk booting problem

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I am trying to boot linux with a ramdisk on a board based on TI dm6446. > > I am facing a weird problem: it correctly boots images smaller than > 2.5MB, while bugger ones stop boot after image decompression, before > the kernel boots. > > I'm not able to find out th

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Building U-Boot for X86 Target

Bhaskar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Regrets to post the first question as a naive user. > I downloaded the U-Boot source code. In order to build it for the x86 > target, I tried following commands. > make x86_config, make x86_config Well, unfortunately it's not that easy. You will have to call

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ramdisk booting problem

up for us to help. Best regards Markus Klotzbücher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-81

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Contribution: EHCI USB HC driver

not want lessen his work here, but > as we talked about a few times, most of his effort got sucked up in > maintaining the current code base. ;-) No offence taken! I'm also glad to see some effort in this direction! Best regards Markus Klotzbücher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Contribution: EHCI USB HC driver

like to merge this driver, but on the other hand it make little sense until there code that actually uses it! Best regards Markus Klotzbücher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +4

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC] Host tool to perform semiautomatic updates

llandre writes: > I think Python could be a very good solution. Since I never worked with > it, I ask just few questions: > 1) for Windows platform, is possible to generate one single .exe file > taht includes all the required stuff (such as libraries and runtime > components)? If not, it is

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] lwmon5 dspic POST spezification

Dear Sascha, "Sascha Laue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > we modified the specification for the lwmon5 board dspic POST. > Additionally I have add defines for the temperature- and voltagevalues. > > Signed-of-by: Sascha Laue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-of-by: Marcel Brasch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 22 March 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> > I would prefer to move this init code not into the board code but into >> > the platform/cpu code. Speaking for PPC4xx, here all configuration I know >> > of

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] USB Storage, add meaningful return value

Aras Vaichas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jerry Van Baren wrote: >> Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Aras, >>> >>> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: This patch changes the "usb storage" command to return success iff it finds a USB storage device, otherwise it returns error. >>> >>>

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] mpc83xx: Add MPC837x PCIE controller RC mode

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> + >> +reg16 = in_le16(hose_cfg_base + PEX_LTSSM_STAT); >> +if (reg16 < 0x16) { >> +printf("No link\n"); >> +hose->indirect_type = INDIRECT_TYPE_NO_PCIE_LINK; >> +} else { >> +printf("li

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

Hi Manuel, Manuel Sahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I took the U-Boot version 1.3.2; now I am able to generate the make env > -> fw_printenv utility. > > I copy the jw_printenv binary and rename it to fw_setenv. A (hard) link would be enough. > I use the config file in the /etc directory. > I

Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I just had the problem of fw_{print,save}env not being able to access > the environment because I was using the default (builtin) environment > after flashing U-Boot. > I wonder if I am the only one having this problem, or is it common > practice to flash the environme

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

Manuel Sahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > but why is there a error concerning NAND flashs if only NOR flashs are > supported ? > > "nand_write: attempting to write not page aligned data" Of course NAND is supported by the kernel. This is why it almost works :-) The error is caused because the too

Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

Aras Vaichas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wolfgang Wegner wrote: >> On our board we have an FPGA, and for different applications a different >> FPGA file shall be loaded without updating the firmware. For this, the >> application has to set an U-Boot environment variable that specifies which >> F

[U-Boot-Users] Pull request USB

): USB Storage, add meaningful return value common/cmd_usb.c |3 +-- common/usb_storage.c |9 ++--- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Viele Grüße / Best regards Markus Klotzbücher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 16

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix compilation error in cmd_usb.c

Hi Anatolij, Anatolij Gustschin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This patch fixes compilation error > cmd_usb.c: In function 'do_usb': > cmd_usb.c:552: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be > > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > include/usb.h |2 +- > 1 file

[U-Boot-Users] Pull request #2 USB

Markus Klotzbuecher (1): USB, Storage: fix a bug introduced in commit common/usb_storage.c |8 include/usb.h|2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Best regards Markus Klotzbücher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & De

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] USB Storage, add meaningful return value

Aras Vaichas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > __ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: make new image support mandatory

Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 27 March 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: >> > BTW: were you able to compile the tools/ directory for the above board? >> > If yes, what were the differences versus the failing build you posted in >> > your other email? >> >> Ah, sorry. I sent

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix host tool build breakage, take two

Hi Bartlomiej, Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Revert commit 87c8431f and fix build breakage so that the build continues > to work on FC systems. > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Patch tested on FC and kubuntu. Could people that reported Haavard's pat

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Current U-Boot doesn't boot device tree enabled kernel anymore

Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 27 March 2008, Bartlomiej Sieka wrote: >> The image got overwritten during decompression. Try loading the image at >> a higher address. > > Right. This works. But I'm wondering why this is the case, since "old" U-Boot > can decompress to th

Re: [U-Boot-Users] how to enable if, then command support in uboot

"Gururaja Hebbar K R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am trying to execute some commands stored in environment as below > > #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \ > "boot_mmc=" > \ > "if mmcinit && " \ ... > Kindly let me know what i need to

Re: [U-Boot-Users] how to enable if, then command support in uboot

"Gururaja Hebbar K R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > #define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS \ > "boot_mmc=" \ > "if mmcinit && " \ > "fatload mmc 0 ${ramfs_addr} ${ramfs_

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] remove error meesage in usb_ohci.c when debug is enabled

"Gururaja Hebbar K R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In u-boot-1.3.1\drivers\usb\usb_ohci.c driver, if debug is enabled > (#define DEBUG), make comes out with an error as below. I appreciate your help, but this has already been fixed here: commit 2596f5b9d353ff3e4387a3325d05740f16958038 Author:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Remove duplicate #undef SHOW_INFO inside drivers\usb\usb_ohci.c

Dear Gururaja, "Gururaja Hebbar K R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >In drivers\usb\usb_ohci.c file, SHOW_INFO is undef at 2 locations. >@line 77 and @line 112. Below patch removes them for code size savings. > >comments welcome. Thank you, well spotted. But, git-am fails for for two r

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

Manuel Sahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > how does uboot handle this flag byte ? (i I use redundant nand) As you can't invalidate the old NAND environment as you can with NOR flash, counters are used instead. So for NAND, the flag byte is a counter which gets incremented for each write. This mean

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot : USB Slave Mode ?

Dear Neeraj, Posting a similar message several times will get you ignored or flamed. Don't do it. "Neeraj Jayaswal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does U-Boot support USB Slave mode ? Not out of the box, though IIRC this has been done before. > I have an ARM926EJS board with USB-OTG. I can conf

Re: [U-Boot-Users] EHCI USB 2.0 Patch

Dear Lance, Lance Ware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wanted to know how could I get a hold of the USB 2.0 patch for > u-boot. I am currently testing a OHCI/EHCI compliant pci usb device. I > have the OHCI part working but would like to have use of the EHCI part > of the device from the usb

Re: [U-Boot-Users] USB SUPPORT

Hi Aneesh, Aneesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I am using an at91rm9200dk custom board.I want to boot kernel and >ram disk from the usb stick.for that i tried to enable the usb support >in the uboot.but now i am getting a message like no storage devices >found . >i gave t

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] USB: fix those pesky aliasing warnings caused by gcc-4.2

USB: fix those pesky aliasing warnings caused by gcc-4.2 Signed-off-by: Markus Klotzbuecher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Detlev Zundel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/usb/usb_ohci.c |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/usb_ohci.c b/

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] USB: remove a cpu bug workaround for an unsupported architecture

USB: remove a cpu bug workaround for an unsupported architecture. Signed-off-by: Markus Klotzbuecher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/usb/usb_ohci.c | 22 -- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/usb_ohci.c b/drivers/usb/usb_ohci.c in

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Setting processor endianess for USB modules

Dear Christian, "Christian Eggers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've recognized that a lot of USB code in U-Boot uses the macros > swap_16() and swap_32() which are defined in usb.h. The behaviour > of the macros is controlled by the define LITTLEENDIAN. > > Is there a good reason NOT to use the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Propagate Error Status to the Shell on fw_printenv Errors

Dear Grant, Grant Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Changed implementation such that fw_printenv returns failure status when one > or more specified variables do not exist or when incorrect command syntax is > used. > > This aids scripting fw_printenv such that the script can key of the re

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Propagate Error Status to the Shell on fw_printenv Errors

ble - it may be useful to print several values here, too, > for example like that: > > $ set `fw_printenv -n netdev ipaddr netmask` > $ ifconfig $1 $2 netmask $3 > > [Well, I know that's a bad example because it's missing all error > checking, but you

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Propagate Error Status to the Shell on fw_printenv Errors

Dear Grant, Grant Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the comments. As suggested by Wolfgang, the "-n" option was > pre-existing in the code before my patch. > > I can investigate extending "-n" as described above; however, the caveat is > that the user knows that the values of some

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Setting processor endianess for USB modules

Dear Christian, Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately I have problems applying your patch against a top of git tree: [EMAIL PROTECTED] u-boot-mainline]$ patch -p5 --dry-run < ~/2008-05-05-usb-remove-LITTLE_ENDIAN-define missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch patching file c

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc_4xx: Kilauea: Add CONFIG_BOOTP_SUBNETMASK to Kilauea board config

When using dhcp/bootp the "netmask" environment variable is not set because CONFIG_BOOTP_SUBNETMASK is not defined. But usually this is desireable, so the following patch adds this this option to the board config. Signed-off-by: Markus Klotzbuecher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/configs/kilauea

Re: [U-Boot-Users] usb write command available in u-boot??

"mahendra varman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In u-boot under common/cmd_usb.c there are commands for > usb info , usb tree, usb reset, > I can find usb read command also > There is no command for usb write That's right. > Is there is possibility to do a usb write command (eg .. writing some

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot help request for OHCI driver with CPU cache on

Ryan CHEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am porting U-Boot to a MIPS64 platform, that uses USB host controller NEC > uPD720101 on PCI bus. What CPU? What version of U-Boot are you using? > I didn't modify anything related with USB driver, I just enabled OHCI > in the configuration. Please be

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot help request for OHCI driver with CPU cache on

Hi Matthias, Matthias Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 15 May 2008 10:37:04 Markus Klotzbücher wrote: >> > Could you suggest me how to solve the problem? >> > Is there any specific part of USB driver that requires cache handling? >> >> None

Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot dos not autostart commands

Alexei Babich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have PXA270 board with embedded by vendor bootleader - "U-Boot 1.3.0". > I define that environment: > --- > $ printenv > baudrate=115200 > bootdelay=3 > bootargs=video=pxafb:mode:800x480-16,active,pixclock:37000,left:100,right:1,hsynclen:10,upper:20,lo

Re: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot dos not autostart commands

Alexei Babich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > bootcmd=cp.b 01e0 a100 13216e >> What are you trying to do here? > Simple test autostart. If I run it manually, this copy linux uImage > from FLASH to RAM.. You know "bootm" will do this for you? Best regards Markus Klotzbuecher -- DENX So

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 02/17] examples/eepro100_eeprom: Fix memcpy to return destination pointer

Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > YES! YES! YES! This gets my vote. I marked the start of this thread > meaning to suggest using temp variables of the right type and get rid of > the complex casting crap, exactly what you did here. Ack, but BTW ...whats wrong with the gener

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] usb: codying style cleanup

Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> --- >> common/cmd_usb.c | 261 - >> common/usb.c | 385 >>

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] socrates: add USB support

generic change and one for updating the board config. Wolfgang, do you want to pick this one up directly (preferably with a more meaningful subject) or shall I push it through the usb tree. Either is fine for me. Best regards Markus Klotzbücher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, M

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Setting processor endianess for USB modules

"Christian Eggers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Unfortunately it's unusable as your mailer wrapped long lines: >> [...] >> Please fix your mailer (or even better use git-send-email) > > Unfortunately I don't have this command (perhaps my git is too old). > > I've adjusted the input window of my

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix endianess conversion in usb_ohci.c

"Christian Eggers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry, I forgot this line: > > Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think this must be swapped (result may be equal). Thanks, applied. Best regards Markus Klotzbuecher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk

[U-Boot-Users] Pull request USB

Dear Wolfgang, Please pull: The following changes since commit 2c8d41969b47eb0b973912830c58689b2ba0e50a: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-testing are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-usb master Christian Eggers (2):

[U-Boot-Users] Problem creating new uImage

Dear List, I'm facing a problem creating a new fdt image following the instructions in the u-boot/doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt u-boot and dtc are top of git: $ dtc -v Version: DTC 1.1.0-g050e6f0c ~/src/git/u-boot/ $ git-describe v1.3.3-32-gf2aeecc I'm in the linux-2.6-denx/ directory with kernel

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Problem creating new uImage

Hi Bartlomiej, Bartlomiej Sieka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Line 11 of doc/uImage.FIT/kernel_fdt.its is: > > data = /incbin/("./vmlinux.bin.gz"); > > So most likely your problem is due to mainline dtc not supporting binary > includes (yet). You need to patch it with original Scott Wood's patch,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Fix endianess conversion in usb_ohci.c

t; 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Markus, can you please comment on this patch? I believe this was merged as commit fb63939b Viele Grüße / Best regards Markus Klotzbücher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/4][RFC] Add initial high speed support to USB code.

y, so it'll take a couple of days for reviewing. Thank you for your patience. Viele Grüße / Best regards Markus Klotzbücher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-669

Re: [U-Boot-Users] usage of git to send patches to u-boot mailinglist

Hi Harald, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > can do, even though I believe it is by far not the best tool to do so. > The problem is that I would have to use one local branch per feature > (i.e. lots of local branches that need to be kept in sync), and even > then any incremental changes

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix USB devices with multiple configurations

Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> >> This patch fixes bugs in usbdcore*.c related to the use of devices >> with multiple configurations. >> >> The original code made mistakes about the meaning of configuration value and >> configuration

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [PATCH] Fix "usb part" command

Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> From: Christian Eggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Only print partition for selected device if user supplied the arg with >> the "usb part [dev]" command. > > What is the rationale of this modification, i. e.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [PATCH] Fix "usb part" command

Christian Eggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From: Christian Eggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Only print partition for selected device if user supplied the arg with > the "usb part [dev]" command. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Markus Klotzbuecher <[EMAIL PROTE

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] USB: shutdown USB before booting

This patch fixes a potentially serious issue related to USB which was discouvered by Martin Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and fixed for ARM920T. Martin wrote: Turn off USB to prevent the host controller from writing to the SDRAM while Linux is booting. This could happen, because the HCCA (Host

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/4][RFC] Add initial high speed support to USB code.

pport. Thank you in advance. Best regards Markus Klotzbücher -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-6

Re: [U-Boot-Users] USB Uboot on OSK5912

"Shivdas Gujare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am working on getting USB-uboot working on OSK5912. > from linux USB gadget "device controller drivers" (i.e. > kernel/drivers/usb/gadget/) it looks like > USB core for omap1510 and OSK5912 is same..But not sure, please confirm No idea. You will ha

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cmd_bootm.c: Fix problem with '#if (CONFIG_CMD_USB)'

Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A recent patch used '#if (CONFIG_CMD_USB)' instead of > '#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_USB)'. This patch fixes this problem and makes > common/bootm.c compile again. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Markus Klotzbuecher <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/7 v6] USB: Add support for OHCI controller on S3C6400

Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Notice: USB on S3C6400 currently works _only_ with switched off MMU. One could > try to enable the MMU, but map addresses 1-to-1, and disable data cache, then > it should work too and we could still profit from instruction cache. > > Signed-off-b

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/7 v6] USB: Add support for OHCI controller on S3C6400

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 17:56 Thu 07 Aug , Markus Klotzbücher wrote: >> I can't apply this to the USB custodian repository without the rest of >> the patchset being applied. I'm also fine if the ARM custodian picks >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/4][RFC] Add ehci core functionality

Hi Remy, On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:18:23PM +0100, Remy Bohmer wrote: > > I have redone the patch. What do you think? > > I can't test them. They compile. > > It is a big change for leaving untested... > Can anybody provide an ack for these patches? I'll test for regressions on sequoia tomorrow.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/4][RFC] Add ehci core functionality

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:22:51AM +0100, michael wrote: > Hi, > > I have redone the patch. What do you think? > > I can't test them. They compile. Not for me (board is sequoia): make -C common/ make[1]: Entering directory `/home/mk/src/git/u-boot/common' ppc_4xxFP-gcc -g -Os -fPIC -ffixed-r14